88 found
Sort by:
  1.  113 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1983). The Invalidity of Gettier-Type Counterexamples. Philosophia 13 (1-2):67-74.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2.  91 DLs
    Robert Almeder (2001). On Reincarnation: A Reply to Hales. Philosophia 28 (1-4):347-358.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3.  81 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1992). Appearance in This List Does Not Preclude a Future Review of the Book. Where They Are Known Prices Are Either Given in $ US or in£ UK. Mind 101.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4.  76 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1995). Externalism and Justification. Philosophia 24 (3-4):465-469.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5.  72 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1975). Defending Gettier Counter-Examples. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):58 – 60.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6.  65 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1994). Defining Justification and Naturalizing Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (3):669-681.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7.  53 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1979). Peirce on Meaning. Synthese 41 (1):1 - 24.
    More often than not, the attractive features of Peirce's theory of meaning have been overlooked because of the temptation on the part of many philosophers to dismiss Peirce as a beknighted forerunner of a narrow form of verificationism frequently identified with the view of the ...
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8.  50 DLs
    Robert Almeder & Franklin J. Hogg (1989). Reliabilism and Goldman's Theory of Justification. Philosophia 19 (2-3):165-187.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9.  46 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1989). Peircean Scientific Realism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 6 (4):357 - 364.
  10.  41 DLs
    Robert Almeder (2007). Pragmatism and Philosophy of Science: A Critical Survey. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):171 – 195.
    After delineating the distinguishing features of pragmatism, and noting the resources that pragmatists have available to respond effectively as pragmatists to the two major objections to pragmatism, I examine and critically evaluate the various proposals that pragmatists have offered as a solution to the problem of induction, followed by a discussion of the pragmatic positions on the status of theoretical entities. Thereafter I discuss the pragmatic posture toward the nature of explanation in science. I conclude that pragmatism has (a) a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11.  31 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1983). Scientific Progress and Peircean Utopian Realism. Erkenntnis 20 (3):253 - 280.
    I argue that (1) if scientific progress, construed in revolutionary terms, were to continue indefinitely long, then any non-trivial question answerable by the use of the scientific method would in fact be answered in a way that would allow for further refinement without undermining the essential correctness of the answer; and (2) it is reasonable to believe that scientific progress will continue indefinitely long. The establishment of (1) and (2) entails that any non-trivial empirically answerable question will be answered in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12.  28 DLs
    Robert F. Almeder (1971). The Idealism of Charles S. Peirce. Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (4):477-484.
    ELSEWHERE WE HAVE ARGUED that Peirce's later thought manifests a commitment to the thesis that there is a world of physical objects whose existence and properties are neither logically nor causally dependent upon the noetic act of any number of finite minds. 1 In other words, we have argued that Peirce's later thought satisfies the definition of metaphysical realism as classically defined. 2 There are, however, a number of texts which might be cited to support the claim that, for Peirce, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13.  23 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1974). Truth and Evidence. Philosophical Quarterly 24 (97):365-368.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14.  22 DLs
    Robert F. Almeder (1984). Review: The Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Vol. I 1857-1866. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (4):494-497.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15.  21 DLs
    Robert F. Almeder (2003). Defeating Skepticism. Philosophical Inquiry 25 (1-2):245-254.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16.  20 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1973). Defeasibility and Scepticism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (3):238 – 244.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17.  19 DLs
    Robert Almeder & David Carey (1991). In Defense of Sharks Moral Issues in Hostile Liquidating Takeovers. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (7):471 - 484.
    In this essay we defend the view that from a purely rule-utilitarian perspective there is no sound argument favoring the immorality of hostile liquidating buyouts. All arguments favoring such a view are seriously flawed. Moreover, there are some good argument favoring the view that such buyouts may be morally obligatory from the rule-utilitarian perspective. We also defend the view that most of the shark repellents in the market are immoral. If we are right in our arguments there is no justification, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18.  17 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1989). Scientific Realism and Explanation. American Philosophical Quarterly 26 (3):173 - 185.
    Assuming for the sake of discussion that there is an external world, The "core" thesis of scientific realism is that some of our empirical beliefs (including the so-Called theoretical beliefs) succeed in correctly describing, In some important measure, The external world. Classical scientific realism also asserts that we are able to say justifiably just "which" of our beliefs so succeed in correctly describing the external world. This paper does not examine this last claim. Rather it seeks to defend the core (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19.  17 DLs
    Robert Almeder (2006). Review: Claudine Tiercelin. Le Doute En Question: Parades Pragmatistes au D�Fi Sceptique (Doubt in Question: Pragmatist Responses to the Challenge of Skepticism). Paris & Tel-Aviv: Editions de l'Eclat, 2005. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (2):282-289.
  20.  16 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1986). Fallibilism, Coherence and Realism. Synthese 68 (2):213 - 223.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21.  15 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1987). Blind Realism. Erkenntnis 26 (1):57 - 101.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22.  14 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1985). On Being Justified in Believing False Propositions. Philosophia 15 (3):271-285.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23.  13 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1997). Carnap and Quine on Empiricism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (3):349 - 364.
    In this paper I discuss the naturalism of Carnap and Quine. I examine Quine's naturalized epistemology and argue that Carnap's naturalism is considerably more attractive.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24.  12 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1987). Justification and Truth Value: A Reply. Philosophia 17 (3):319-322.
    Among other things, Odegard urged that a person can be completely justified in believing a false proposition because the truth condition can be shown to be satisfied independently of the satisfaction of the evidence condition for human knowledge. I respond to his argument and other arguments attacking the arguments I previously offered for the view that a person cannot be completely justified in believing a false proposition.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25.  12 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1995). Dretske's Dreadful Question. Philosophia 24 (3-4):449-457.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26.  11 DLs
    Robert F. Almeder (1973). Science and Idealism. Philosophy of Science 40 (2):242-254.
    In this essay it is argued that (1) if the process of scientific inquiry were to continue foreever, then science would ultimately terminate in the acceptance of a single theoretical framework better than all conceivable others, and (2) there is some evidence in favor of the view that science will continue unto eternity but no evidence in favor of the contrary view. In arguing for claim (1) it is claimed that if we are to understand the sense in which science (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27.  11 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1980). The Harmony of Confucian and Taoist Moral Attitudes. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 7 (1):51-53.
  28.  10 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1990). Vacuous Truth. Synthese 85 (3):507 - 524.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29.  9 DLs
    Robert F. Almeder (1970). Peirce's Theory of Perception. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 6 (2):99 - 110.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30.  9 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1986). A Definition of Pragmatism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (1):79 - 87.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31.  9 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1985). Peirce's Thirteen Theories of Truth. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 21 (1):77 - 94.
    In this paper i show that no fewer than thirteen distinct interpretations of peirce's views on truth exist in the literature, that most are the product of sloppy scholarship, that the standard view is wrong, and that the only two plausible views are offered by n rescher and david savan respectively. whether the correct view of what peirce argued is defensible is not examined.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32.  9 DLs
    Milton Snoeyenbos, Robert F. Almeder & James M. Humber (eds.) (2001). Business Ethics. Prometheus Books.
  33.  9 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1973). Peirce's Pragmatism and Scotistic Realism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 9 (1):3 - 23.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34.  8 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1982). Peircean Fallibilism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 18 (1):57 - 65.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35.  8 DLs
    Robert F. Almeder (1983). Basic Knowledge and Jusificaton. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):115 - 127.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36.  7 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1999). Recent Work on Error. Philosophia 27 (1-2):3-58.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37.  7 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1990). On Naturalizing Epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (4):263 - 279.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38.  7 DLs
    Robert Almeder (2015). Pragmatism: An Overview. Metascience 24 (1):25-29.
    This is a fine introduction to the study of pragmatism. It is well written, thoroughly researched, and clearly focused in presenting the history and implications of the core positions of classical and contemporary pragmatists. It is targeted basically for the general college and university student in American and Western Philosophy, the History of Philosophy, and American Studies. Without too much of a stretch, it seems equally suitable for the general reader familiar with some philosophy outside the academic and scholarly community. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39.  6 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1998). Book Review. [REVIEW] Philosophia 26 (1-2):207-212.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40.  6 DLs
    Robert Almeder, Jan Narveson, Bernard Boxill, Gerald Press, Thomas Brickhouse, Anthony Preus, Joseph Campbell, George Rainbolt, Randolph Clarke & Bernard Rollin (1997). Manuscript Referees for the Journal of Ethics. Journal of Ethics 1 (401):401-401.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41.  5 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1986). The Limits of Science. Idealistic Studies 16 (3):259-260.
  42.  5 DLs
    Robert Almeder & Robert Arrington (1977). Mannison on Inexplicable Knowledge and Belief. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):87 – 90.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43.  5 DLs
    Robert F. Almeder (2006). Le Doute En Question: Parades Pragmatistes au Defi Sceptique (Review). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (2):282-289.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44.  5 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1975). The Epistemological Realism of Charles Peirce. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 11 (1):3 - 17.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45.  5 DLs
    Robert Almeder (1976). On Seeing the Truth: A Reply. Philosophical Quarterly 26 (103):163-165.
    This paper is a reply to hoffman's piece "almeder on truth and evidence" ("philosophical quarterly", Volume 25, January 1975). In "truth and evidence" ("philosophical quarterly", Volume 24, October 1974) I had argued that gettier-Type counterexamples to the classical definition of knowledge as completely justified true belief are defective because they assume the false proposition that a person can be completely justified in believing a false proposition. Hoffman objected to my reasons for saying as much and in this paper I reply (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46.  4 DLs
    Robert Almeder (2010). Truth and Skepticism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Robert Almeder provides a comprehensive discussion and definitive refutation of our common conception of truth as a necessary condition for knowledge of the world, and to defend in detail an epistemic conception of truth without falling into the usual epistemological relativism or classical idealism in which all properties of the world turn out to be linguistic in nature and origin. There is no other book available that clearly and thoroughly defends the case for an epistemic conception of truth and also (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47.  4 DLs
    Robert F. Almeder (1980). Nicholas Rescher: Scientific Progress. Philosophical Inquiry 2 (4):582-583.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48.  3 DLs
    Robert F. Almeder (1996). Blind Realism: An Essay on Human Knowledge and Natural Science. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Blind Realism originated in the deeply felt conviction that the widespread acceptance of Gettier-type counterexamples to the classical definition of knowledge rests in a demonstrably erroneous understanding of the nature of human knowledge. In seeking to defend that conviction, Robert F. Almeder offers a fairly detailed and systematic picture of the nature and limits of human factual knowledge.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49.  3 DLs
    Robert Almeder (2008). Pragmatism and Science. In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Routledge 91--99.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 88