85 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Robert B. Talisse [85]Robert Basil Talisse [1]
  1. Robert B. Talisse, Response to Ralston.
    My response to Ralston's paper "In Defense of Democracy as a Way of Life," both presented at the Eastern APA meeting (2008).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Robert B. Talisse, A Farewell to Deweyan Democracy: Towards a New Pragmatist Politics.
    The revival of pragmatism has brought renewed enthusiasm for John Dewey's conception of democracy. Drawing upon Rawlsian concerns regarding the fact of reasonable pluralism, the author argues that Deweyan democracy is unworthy of resurrection. A modified version of Deweyan democracy recently proposed by Elizabeth Anderson is then taken up and also found to be lacking. Then the author proposes a model of democracy that draws upon Peirce's social epistemology. The result is a non-Deweyan but nonetheless pragmatist option in democratic theory.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Robert B. Talisse, Folk Epistemology and the Justification of Democracy.
    In introduce the concept of a "folk epistemology" and argue that norms arising from our folk epistemic commitments provide a compelling social epistemic justification for democratic political norms.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Robert B. Talisse, Social Epistemic Liberalism.
    The author builds upon recent work by Allen Buchanan and develops a comprehensive version of liberalism based in a partially comprehensive social epistemic doctrine. The author then argues that this version of liberalism is sufficiently accommodating of the fact of reasonable pluralism. The conclusion is that the founding premise of political liberalism admits of a counterexample; there is a version of comprehensive liberalism that is sufficiently pluralistic.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Michael Barnhardt, F. Thomas Burke, D. Micah Hester, Robert B. Talisse & Allen Carlson (forthcoming). Alperson, Philip, Ed. Diversity and Community: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.£ 55.00;£ 16.99 Pb. Audi, Robert. Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge, New York: Routledge, 2003. $22.95 Pb. [REVIEW] Philosophy Today.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Robert B. Talisse (forthcoming). Reply to Karin Jønch-Clausen and Klemens Kappel. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice:1-5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Robert B. Talisse (2015). Engaging Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Routledge.
    Engaging Political Philosophy introduces readers to the central problems of political philosophy. Presuming no prior work in the area, the book explores the fundamental philosophical questions regarding freedom, authority, justice, and democracy. More than a survey of the central figures and texts, Engaging Political Philosophy takes readers on a philosophical exploration of the core of the field, directly examining the arguments and concepts that drive the contemporary debates. Thus the fundamental issues of political philosophy are encountered first-hand, rather than through (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Robert B. Talisse (2015). On Sidney Hook’s “The Ethics of Suicide”. Ethics 125 (2):549-551,.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Cheryl Misak & Robert B. Talisse (2014). Debate: Pragmatist Epistemology and Democratic Theory: A Reply to Eric MacGilvray. Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (3):366-376.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Robert B. Talisse (2014). Moral Authority and the Deliberative Model. Philosophical Studies 170 (3):555-561.
    Gerald Gaus’s The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World is refreshingly ambitious. It seems to me that our field today is a little too eager to “[stay] on the surface, philosophically speaking” (Rawls 1999, p. 395; cf. 2005, p. 10). However, the scope of Gaus’s ambition complicates the critic’s task. When a philosophical work aims to present something as grand as a “theory of freedom and morality,” it seems plausible to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Robert B. Talisse (2014). Pragmatist Political Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 9 (2):123-130.
    This essay surveys three prominent trends in current pragmatist political philosophy: Deweyan Democratic Perfectionism, Rortyan Ironism, and Pragmatist Epistemic Deliberativism. After articulating the main commitments of each view, the author raises philosophical problems each must confront. The essay closes with the more general criticism that pragmatist political theory has been nearly exclusively focused on democracy, but needs to address additional topics.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Robert B. Talisse (2014). The Ethics of Citizenship. The Philosophers' Magazine 64:99-104.
  13. Scott F. Aikin & Robert B. Talisse (2013). Matters of Conscience. The Philosophers' Magazine 61 (61):113-114.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Scott F. Aikin & Robert B. Talisse (2013). Why We Argue : A Guide to Political Disagreement. Routledge.
    Why We Argue : A Guide to Political Disagreement presents an accessible and engaging introduction to the theory of argument, with special emphasis on the way argument works in public political debate. The authors develop a view according to which proper argument is necessary for one’s individual cognitive health; this insight is then expanded to the collective health of one’s society. Proper argumentation, then, is seen to play a central role in a well-functioning democracy. Written in a lively style and (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Andrew T. Forcehimes & Robert B. Talisse (2013). Clarifying Cohen: A Response to Jubb and Hall. Res Publica 19 (4):371-379.
    In this brief essay, we clarify Cohen’s ‘Facts and Principles’ argument, and then argue that the objections posed by two recent critiques of Cohen—Robert Jubb (Res Publica 15:337–353, 2009) and Edward Hall (Res Publica 19:173–181, 2013)—look especially vulnerable to the charge of being self-defeating. It may still be that Cohen’s view concerning facts and principles is false. Our aim here is merely to show that two recent attempts to demonstrate its falsity are unlikely to succeed.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Robert B. Talisse (2013). Altruism and Self‐Sacrifice. Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (2):112-114.
  17. Robert B. Talisse (2013). A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. Routledge.
    In recent years there has been a renewed interest in American pragmatism. In political philosophy, the revival of pragmatism has led to a new appreciation for the democratic theory of John Dewey. In this book, Robert B. Talisse advances a series of pragmatic arguments against Deweyan democracy. Particularly, Talisse argues that Deweyan democracy cannot adequately recognize pluralism , the fact that intelligent, sincere, and well-intentioned persons can disagree sharply and reasonably over moral ideals. Drawing upon the epistemology of the founder (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Robert B. Talisse (2013). Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State, by Robert Audi. Mind 122 (487):fzt083.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Robert B. Talisse (2013). Recovering American Philosophy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49 (3):424-433.
    In The American Pragmatists Cheryl Misak (2013) offers a highly compelling and nuanced account of pragmatism’s founding and development. Her narrative is also unorthodox, as it undermines the story of pragmatism’s past that prevails among contemporary classical pragmatists.1 That Misak gladly acknowledges the deep sympathies between pragmatism and logical empiricism (2013: 156) is enough to place The American Pragmatists far outside the mainstream of classicalists’ self-understanding. Refreshingly, Misak’s book demonstrates just how distorted that self-understanding is. Yet Misak’s achievement is not (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Robert B. Talisse (2013). Religion in Politics: What's the Problem? [REVIEW] Think 12 (33):65-73.
    Research Articles Robert B. Talisse, Think , FirstView Article.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Robert B. Talisse (2013). Religion in Politics: What's the Problem?: Talisse Religion in Politics. Think 12 (33):65-73.
    A few years ago, I, an American, was giving a talk at a political philosophy conference in the United Kingdom. My topic was religion in democratic politics, and I delivered what I thought was a splendid line of argument supporting the idea that religion has at most a highly constrained role to play in democratic politics. The audience was appreciative enough, but during the question and answer session, there emerged the charge that my paper had addressed a uniquely ‘American’ problem, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Robert B. Talisse (2013). Sustaining Democracy: Folk Epistemology and Social Conflict. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (4):500-519.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Robert B. Talisse (2013). Why Pragmatists Should Be Rawlsians. Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):71-78.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Alain Badiou, Miguel Beistegui, David Boersema, Steven M. Cahn, Robert B. Talisse, Adam Rosen-Carole, Todd Mayers, Françoise Dastur, Juan Manuel Garrido & Boris Gasparov (2012). Lisa Marie Anderson, Hamann and the Tradition (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2012). David Appelbaum, À Propos, Levinas (Albany: SUNY Press, 2012). Alain Badiou, The Adventure of French Philosophy, Trans. Bruno Bosteels (New York: Verso Press, 2012). [REVIEW] Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 33 (2).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Steven M. Cahn & Robert B. Talisse (eds.) (2012). Political Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century: Essential Essays. Westview Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Robert B. Talisse (2012). Reply to Rondel. Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (2):81-85.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Robert B. Talisse (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Dewey Molly Cochran (Ed). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (1):112-114.
  28. Robert B. Talisse (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Dewey (Review). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (1):112-114.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Robert B. Talisse (2011). Comment on Clanton and Forcehimes. Southwest Philosophy Review 27 (2):79-81.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Robert B. Talisse (2011). John Dewey's Quest for Unity: The Journey of a Promethean Mystic – Richard M. Gale. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):863-864.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Robert B. Talisse (2011). Pluralism and Liberal Politics. Routledge.
    In this book, Robert Talisse critically examines the moral and political implications of pluralism, the view that our best moral thinking is indeterminate and that moral conflict is an inescapable feature of the human condition. Through a careful engagement with the work of William James, Isaiah Berlin, John Rawls, and their contemporary followers, Talisse distinguishes two broad types of moral pluralism: metaphysical and epistemic. After arguing that metaphysical pluralism does not offer a compelling account of value and thus cannot ground (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Robert B. Talisse (2011). Toward a New Pragmatist Politics. Metaphilosophy 42 (5):552-571.
    In A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy, I launched a pragmatist critique of Deweyan democracy and a pragmatist defense of an alternative view of democracy, one based in C. S. Peirce's social epistemology. In this article, I develop a more precise version of the criticism of Deweyan democracy I proposed in A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy, and provide further details of the Peircean alternative. Along the way, some recent critics are addressed.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Robert B. Talisse (2011). Value Pluralism and Liberal Politics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):87-100.
    Contemporary Neo-Berlinians contend that value pluralism is the best account of the moral universe we inhabit; they also contend that value pluralism provides a powerful case for liberalism. In this paper, I challenge both claims. Specifically, I will examine the arguments offered in support of value pluralism; finding them lacking, I will then offer some reasons for thinking that value pluralism is not an especially promising view of our moral universe.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Scott F. Aikin, Michael Harbour, Jonathan A. Neufeld & Robert B. Talisse (2010). Epistemic Abstainers, Epistemic Martyrs, and Epistemic Converts. Logos and Episteme 1 (2):211-219.
    An intuitive view regarding the epistemic significance of disagreement says that when epistemic peers disagree, they should suspend judgment. This abstemious view seems to embody a kind of detachment appropriate for rational beings; moreover, it seems to promote a kind of conciliatory inclination that makes for irenic and cooperative further discussion. Like many strategies for cooperation, however, the abstemious view creates opportunities for free-riding. In this essay, the authors argue that the believer who suspends judgment in the face of peer (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Scott F. Aikin, Michael Harbour & Robert B. Talisse (2010). Nagel on Public Education and Intelligent Design. Journal of Philosophical Research 35:209-219.
    In a recent article, Thomas Nagel argues against the court’s decision to strike down the Dover school district’s requirement that biology teachers in Dover public schools inform their students about Intelligent Design. Nagel contends that this ruling relies on questionable demarcation between science and nonscience and consequently misapplies the Establishment Clause of the constitution. Instead, he argues in favor of making room for an open discussion of these issues rather than an outright prohibition against Intelligent Design. We contend that Nagel’s (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Robert B. Talisse (2010). Author Copy. Contemporary Political Theory 9:45-49.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Robert B. Talisse (2010). An Epistemological Defense of Democracy. Critical Review 22 (2-3):281-291.
    Folk epistemology?the idea that one can't help believing that one's beliefs are true?provides an alternative to political theorists' inadequate defenses of democracy. It implicitly suggests a dialectical, truth-seeking norm for dealing with people who do not share one's own beliefs. Folk epistemology takes us beyond Mill's consequentialist claim for democracy (that the free array of opinions in a deliberative democracy leads us to the truth); instead, the epistemic freedom of the democratic process itself makes citizens confident that evidence for one's (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Robert B. Talisse (2010). Brill Online Books and Journals. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Robert B. Talisse (2010). Does Value Pluralism Entail Liberalism? Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3):303-320.
    Isaiah Berlin repeatedly attempted to derive liberalism from value pluralism. It is generally agreed that Berlin's arguments fail; however, neo-Berlinians have taken up the project of securing the entailment. This paper begins with an account of why the Berlinian project seems attractive to contemporary theorists. I then examine Berlin's argument. With this background in place, I argue that recent attempts by William Galston and George Crowder to rescue the Berlinian project do not succeed.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Robert B. Talisse (2010). Reply to Festenstein. Contemporary Political Theory 9 (1):45.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Robert B. Talisse (2010). Why I Am Not a Pluralist (Presidential Address). Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):5-15.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Alison Kadlec, Bruno Latour, Peter Weibel & Robert B. Talisse (2009). Dewey's Critical Pragmatism. Political Theory 37 (3):423-431.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Robert B. Talisse (2009). Precis of a Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 45-49.
    This short paper summarizes the main line of argument in my book, *A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy* (Routledge, 2007), which is the subject of a forthcoming symposium issue of the journal *Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society*.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Robert B. Talisse (2009). Reply to Clanton and Forcehimes. Contemporary Pragmatism 6 (2):185.
    In this reply I respond to the article "Can Peircean Epistemic Perfectionists Bid Farewell to Deweyan Democracy?" by J. Caleb Clanton and Andrew T. Forcehimes, in this journal issue.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Robert B. Talisse (2009). Responses to My Critics. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 90-108.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Robert B. Talisse (2009). Responses to My Critics: TalisseRobert B.Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):90-108.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Robert B. Talisse (2009). Symposium on Robert Talisse'sA Pragmatist Philosophy of DemocracyPrecis. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):45-49.
  48. Robert B. Talisse, Maureen Eckert, Norman Bowie, Steven M. Cahn, Randall Curren, Alan Goldman, Tziporah Kasachkoff, Peter Markie, John O'Connor, David Rosenthal, Robert Simon, David Shatz, George Sher, Douglas Stalker & Christine Vitrano (2009). A Teacher's Life: Essays for Steven M. Cahn. Lexington Books.
    This is a collection of 13 essays honoring Steven Cahn, presented to him on the occasion of his 25th year as Professor of Philosophy at the City University of New York. The essays address issues concerning the teaching of philosophy, the responsibilities of professors, and the good life.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Scott F. Aikin & Robert B. Talisse (2008). Modus Tonens. Argumentation 22 (4):521-529.
    Restating an interlocutor’s position in an incredulous tone of voice can sometimes serve legitimate dialectical ends. However, there are cases in which incredulous restatement is out of bounds. This article provides an analysis of one common instance of the inappropriate use of incredulous restatement, which the authors call “modus tonens.” The authors argue that modus tonens is vicious because it pragmatically implicates the view that one’s interlocutor is one’s cognitive subordinate and provides a cue to like-minded onlookers that dialectical opponents (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Scott F. Aikin & Robert B. Talisse (2008). Rockmore on Analytic Pragmatism. Metaphilosophy 39 (2):155–162.
    Aikin and Talisse reply to Rockmore's case against the 'analytic pragmatist' tradition.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 85