15 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Robert Fine [14]Robert L. Fine [2]
  1. Robert Fine (2012). Debating Human Rights, Law and Subjectivity : Arendt, Adorno and Critical Theory. In Lars Rensmann & Samir Gandesha (eds.), Arendt and Adorno: Political and Philosophical Investigations. Stanford University Press.
  2. Robert Fine (2011). Cosmopolitanism and Natural Law: Rethinking Kant. In Maria Rovisco & Magdalena Nowicka (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Cosmopolitanism. Ashgate. 147.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Robert Fine (2011). Dehumanising the Dehumanisers: Reversal in Human Rights Discourse. Journal of Global Ethics 6 (2):179-190.
    If the legitimacy of international humanitarian and human rights law lies, in part at least, in its capacity to confront dehumanising actions in the modern world, we may speak of the limits of this achievement. It is well known that people who commit genocide or crimes against humanity typically dehumanise those against whom their crimes are committed and that the humanitarian and human rights dimensions of international law were developed in response to the radicalisation of this phenomenon. The expanded scope (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Robert Fine (2011). Rationing or Stewardship in Pursuit of Just Medical Reform. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (7):22 - 23.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 7, Page 22-23, July 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Robert L. Fine (2010). The Physician's Covenant With Patients in Pain. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (11):23-24.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Robert Fine (2009). Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights: Radicalism in a Global Age. Metaphilosophy 40 (1):8-23.
    Abstract: The cosmopolitan imagination constructs a world order in which the idea of human rights is an operative principle of justice. Does it also construct an idealisation of human rights? The radicality of Enlightenment cosmopolitanism, as developed by Kant, lay in its analysis of the roots of organised violence in the modern world and its visionary programme for changing the world. Today, the temptation that faces the cosmopolitan imagination is to turn itself into an endorsement of the existing order of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Robert Fine (2007). Cosmopolitanism. New York.
    Preface : twenty theses on cosmopolitan social theory -- Taking the "ism" out of cosmopolitanism : the equivocations of the new cosmopolitanism -- Confronting reputations : Kant's cosmopolitanism and Hegel's critique -- Cosmopolitanism and political community : the equivocations of constitutional patriotism -- Cosmopolitanism and international law : from the law of peoples to the constitutionalisation of international law -- Cosmopolitanism and humanitarian military intervention : war, peace and human rights -- Cosmopolitanism and punishment : prosecuting crimes against humanity -- (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Robert Fine (2007). Cosmopolitismo: Una agenda de investigación para las ciencias sociales. In Oliver Kozlarek (ed.), Entre Cosmopolitismo y Conciencia Del Mundo: Hacia Una Crítica Del Pensamiento Atópico. Centro de Cooperación Regional Para la Educación de Adultos En América Latina y El Caribe. 16.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. María Pía Lara & Robert Fine (2007). Justice and the Public Sphere : The Dynamics of Nancy Fraser's Critical Theory. In Terry Lovell (ed.), (Mis)Recognition, Social Inequality and Social Justice: Nancy Fraser and Pierre Bourdieu. Routledge.
  10. Robert Fine (2006). A Social Science Research Agenda. In Gerard Delanty (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary European Social Theory. Routledge. 242.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Robert Fine (2003). Kosmopolitismus a Socialni Teorie. Filosoficky Casopis 51 (3):407-429.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Robert Fine (2003). Kant’s Theory of Cosmopolitanism and Hegel’s Critique. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (6):609-630.
    s theory of cosmopolitan right is widely viewed as the philosophical origin of modern cosmopolitan thought. Hegel’s critique of Kant’s theory of cosmopolitan right, by contrast, is usually viewed as regressive and nationalistic in relation to both Kant and the cosmopolitan tradition. This paper reassesses the political and philosophical character of Hegel’s critique of Kant, Hegel’s own relation to cosmopolitan thinking, and more fleetingly some of the implications of his critique for contemporary social criticism. It is argued that Hegel’s critique (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Robert Fine & Will Smith (2003). Habermas's Ambivalent Modernism'. Constellations 10 (4):469-488.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Robert Fine & Will Smith (2003). Jurgen Habermas's Theory of Cosmopolitanism. Constellations 10 (4):469-487.
  15. Robert L. Fine (2001). The Texas Advance Directives Act of 1999: Politics and Reality. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 13 (1):59-81.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation