109 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Robert J. Fogelin [94]Robert Fogelin [15]
  1. Robert J. Fogelin (2015). Wittgenstein. Routledge.
    No serious philosopher or student of philosophy can afford to neglect Wittgenstein's work. Professor Fogelin provides an authoritative critical evaluation of both the _Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus_ and _Philosophical Investigations_, enabling the reader to come to grips with these difficult yet key works. Fogelin explains Wittgenstein's attempt in the _Tractatus_ to combine a picture theory of propositional structure, and also explores Wittgenstein's own criticisms of the Tractarian synthesis. He gives particular attention to topics in the philosophy of language, logic, psychology and the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  14
    Robert J. Fogelin (1987/1999). Wittgenstein. Routledge.
    This book is available either individually, or as part of the specially-priced Arguments of the Philosphers Collection.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   38 citations  
  3.  78
    Robert J. Fogelin (1994). Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. Oxford University Press.
    This work, written from a neo-Pyrrhonian perspective, is an examination of contemporary theories of knowledge and justification. It takes ideas primarily found in Sextus Empiricus's Outlines of Pyrrhonism, restates them in a modern idiom, and then asks whether any contemporary theory of knowledge meets the challenges they raise. The first part, entitled "Gettier and the Problem of Knowledge," attempts to rescue our ordinary concept of knowledge from those philosophers who have assigned burdens to it that it cannot bear. Properly understood, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  4.  4
    Robert J. Fogelin (2003). A Defense of Hume on Miracles. Princeton Univ Pr.
    Arguing that criticisms have--from the very start--rested on misreadings, Fogelin begins by providing a narrative of the way Hume’s argument actually unfolds. What Hume’s critics (and even some of his defenders) have failed to see is that Hume’s primary argument depends on fixing the appropriate standards of evaluating testimony presented on behalf of a miracle. Given the definition of a miracle, Hume quite reasonably argues that the standards for evaluating such testimony must be extremely high. Hume then argues that, as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  5.  13
    Robert J. Fogelin (1985). Hume's Skepticism in the Treatise of Human Nature. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  6. Robert J. Fogelin (1976). Hamilton's Theory of Quantifying the Predicate--A Correction. Philosophical Quarterly 26 (105):352-353.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  10
    Robert Fogelin (2011). Figuratively Speaking: Revised Edition. OUP Usa.
    In this updated edition of his brief, engaging book, Robert J. Fogelin examines figures of speech that concern meaning-irony, hyperbole, understatement, similes, metaphors, and others-to show how they work and to explain their attraction.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  33
    Robert Fogelin (1985). The Logic of Deep Disagreements. Informal Logic 7 (1):3-11.
    Direct download (20 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  9. Robert J. Fogelin (2004). Aspects of Quine's Naturalized Epistemology. In Roger F. Gibson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Quine. Cambridge University Press 19--46.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  10.  30
    Robert J. Fogelin (2000). Contextualism and Externalism: Trading in One Form of Skepticism for Another. Noûs 34 (s1):43 - 57.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  11. Robert J. Fogelin (1984). Hume and the Missing Shade of Blue. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (December):263-272.
  12. Robert J. Fogelin (1991). Figuratively Speaking. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (2):471-473.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  13. Robert J. Fogelin (1972). Austinian Ifs. Mind 81 (324):578-580.
  14.  18
    Robert J. Fogelin (1991). Studies in the Way of Words by Paul Grice. Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):213-219.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Robert J. Fogelin (1982). Baier on Hume's Absurd Passions. Journal of Philosophy 79 (11):652.
  16.  1
    Robert J. Fogelin (2009). Taking Wittgenstein at His Word: A Textual Study. Princeton University Press.
    Taking Wittgenstein at His Word is an experiment in reading organized around a central question: What kind of interpretation of Wittgenstein's later philosophy emerges if we adhere strictly to his claims that he is not in the business of presenting and defending philosophical theses and that his only aim is to expose persistent conceptual misunderstandings that lead to deep philosophical perplexities? Robert Fogelin draws out the therapeutic aspects of Wittgenstein's later work by closely examining his account of rule-following (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  12
    Robert J. Fogelin (1991). Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  18.  25
    Robert J. Fogelin (2003). Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal. Oxford University Press.
    Human beings are both supremely rational and deeply superstitious, capable of believing just about anything and of questioning just about everything. Indeed, just as our reason demands that we know the truth, our skepticism leads to doubts we can ever really do so. In Walking the Tightrope of Reason, Robert J. Fogelin guides readers through a contradiction that lies at the very heart of philosophical inquiry. Fogelin argues that our rational faculties insist on a purely rational account of the universe, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  19.  9
    Robert J. Fogelin (1996). Wittgenstein's Critique of Philosophy. In Hans D. Sluga & David G. Stern (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge University Press 34--58.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  20. M. R. Ayers, Phillip D. Cummins, Robert Fogelin, Don Garrett, Edwin McCann, Charles J. McCracken, George Pappas, G. A. J. Rogers, Barry Stroud, Ian Tipton, Margaret D. Wilson & Kenneth Winkler (1998). The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This collection of essays on themes in the work of John Locke , George Berkeley , and David Hume , provides a deepened understanding of major issues raised in the Empiricist tradition. In exploring their shared belief in the experiential nature of mental constructs, The Empiricists illuminates the different methodologies of these great Enlightenment philosophers and introduces students to important metaphysical and epistemological issues including the theory of ideas, personal identity, and skepticism. It will be especially useful in courses devoted (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  21.  29
    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, James Moor & Robert Fogelin (1986). A Defense of Modus Ponens. Journal of Philosophy 83 (5):296-300.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  22.  38
    Robert J. Fogelin (1982). Wittgenstein's Operator N. Analysis 42 (3):124 - 127.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  23.  64
    Robert J. Fogelin (1998). David Lewis on Indicative and Counterfactual Conditionals. Analysis 58 (4):286–289.
    David Lewis has argued that there must be a difference between indicative and counterfactual conditionals beyond an indication of truth-value commitments. He cites the following contrast to show this: If Oswald did not shoot Kennedy, then someone else did. If Oswald had not shot Kennedy, then someone else would have. In response, it is shown that this difference is better explained by shifts in context. Keep context fixed, the contrast disappears. EG: If Oswald was not the one who shot Kennedy, (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24.  15
    Robert J. Fogelin (1998). Garrett on the Consistency of Hume's Philosophy. Hume Studies 24 (1):161-169.
    In *Cognition and Commitment in Hume's Philosophy*, Don Garrett argues for the coherence of Hume's philosophy when it is viewed as work in cognitive psychology. Without denying this, I argue that there is more to Hume's standpoint than cognitive psychology. Specifically, Hume's standpoint shifts as the level of inquiry changes. A descriptive cognitive psychology is one standpoint that he occupies. However, he occupies other standpoints as well: the commonsense standpoint of the vulgar is one; the radical doubt of the skeptic (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  25.  27
    Robert J. Fogelin (1997). Quine's Limited Naturalism. Journal of Philosophy 94 (11):543-563.
  26. Robert J. Fogelin (2008). Hume's Scepticism. In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press
  27.  30
    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, James Moor & Robert Fogelin (1990). A Defence of Modus Tollens. Analysis 50 (1):9 - 16.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  28.  35
    Robert J. Fogelin (1981). Wittgenstein and Classical Scepticism. International Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1):3-15.
  29.  40
    Robert Fogelin (1988). Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite Divisibility. Philosophical Review 97 (1):47-69.
    Since both berkeley and hume are committed to the view that a line is composed of finitely many fundamental parts, They must find responses to the standard geometrical proofs of infinite divisibility. They both repeat traditional arguments intended to show that infinite divisibility leads to absurdities, E.G., That all lines would be infinite in length, That all lines would have the same length, Etc. In each case, Their arguments rest upon a misunderstanding of the concept of a limit, And thus (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  30.  5
    Robert J. Fogelin (1967). Evidence and Meaning. New York, Humanities Press.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  31. Robert Fogelin (2005). Berkeley and the „Principles of Human Knowledge“. Filosoficky Casopis 53 (445):146-148.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32.  33
    Robert J. Fogelin (1983). Wittgenstein on Identity. Synthese 56 (2):141 - 154.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  33.  58
    Robert J. Fogelin (1971). Three Platonic Analogies. Philosophical Review 80 (3):371-382.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  13
    Robert J. Fogelin (1997). Review: Précis of Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):395 - 400.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  35.  19
    Robert J. Fogelin (1990). A Reading of Aquinas's Five Ways. American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (4):305 - 313.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36. Robert J. Fogelin (2000). Contextualism and Externalism: Trading in One Form of Skepticism for Another. Philosophical Issues 10 (1):43-57.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  37.  45
    Robert J. Fogelin (1999). The Sceptic's Burden. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (2):159 – 172.
    The basic thesis ofMichaelWilliams'book Unnatural Doubts is that sceptical doubts, at least of a Cartesian variety, are neither natural nor intuitive, but are, instead, the product of 'contentious and possibly dispensable theoretical preconceptions'. In particular, for Williams, scepticism arises because of a commitment to what he calls 'epistemic realism'. A fundamental thesis of my book Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification is that scepticism (in its most challenging forms) is not based upon such prior theoretical commitments, but rather is the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  16
    Robert J. Fogelin (1990). What Hume Actually Said About Miracles. Hume Studies 16 (1):81-86.
    Contrary to the standard interpretations, this essay shows that Hume, in Section X of the Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, explicitly put forward an a priori argument intended to show that, by the nature of the case, there must always be adequate empirical evidence establishing that a reported miracle could not have taken place.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  4
    Robert J. Fogelin (1982). Hume's Moral Theory by J. L. Mackie. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):210-213.
  40.  6
    Robert J. Fogelin & Timothy J. Duggan (1987). Fallacies. Argumentation 1 (3):255-262.
    Fallacies are things people commit, and when they commit them they do something wrong. What kind of activities are people engaged in when they commit fallacies, and in what way are they doing something wrong? Many different things are called fallacies. The diversity of the use of the concept of a fallacy suggests that we are dealing with a family of cases not related by a common essence. However, we suggest a simple account of the nature of fallacies which encompasses (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  35
    Robert J. Fogelin (1984). Taking Skepticism Seriously. Journal of Philosophy 81 (10):552.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  36
    Robert J. Fogelin (1983). Hume and the Problem of Causation. Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (3):429-430.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  8
    Robert J. Fogelin (2000). Contextualismo y externismo: cambiando una forma de escepticismo por otra. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):55-70.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  5
    Robert J. Fogelin (2000). Replies. Noûs 34 (s1):86-93.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45. Robert J. Fogelin (2004). The Skeptics Are Coming! The Skeptics Are Coming! In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Oxford University Press 161--173.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  2
    Robert J. Fogelin (2009). Conventions for Citations and Abbreviations. In Taking Wittgenstein at His Word: A Textual Study. Princeton University Press
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Robert J. Fogelin (1987). Julia Annas and Jonathan Barnes, The Modes of Skepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 7 (2):50-52.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  3
    Jaakko Hintikka, Margaret Donaldson & Robert J. Fogelin (1969). Reviews. [REVIEW] Synthese 19 (3-4):466-480.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  9
    Robert J. Fogelin (1968). Wittgenstein and Intuitionism. American Philosophical Quarterly 5 (4):267 - 274.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  50.  31
    Robert J. Fogelin (2004). Stroud's Quest for Reality. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):401-407.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 109