11 found
Order:
  1. Robert Maydole (2003). The Modal Perfection Argument for the Existence of a Supreme Being. Philo 6 (2):299-313.
    The Modal Perfection Argument (MPA) for the existence of a Supreme Being is a new ontological argument that is rooted in the insights of Anselm, Leibniz and Gödel. Something is supreme if and only if nothing is possibly greater, and a perfection is a property that it is better to have than not. The premises of MPA are that supremity is a perfection, perfections entail only perfections, and the negation of a perfection is not a perfection. I do three things (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  2.  29
    Robert Maydole (2010). On Oppy's Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument. Philo 8 (2):123-130.
    This paper is a reply to Graham Oppy’s “Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument,” published in Philo 7, 2 . I argue that he fails to refute myModal Perfection Argument for the existence of a Supreme Being, and that it remains arguably sound in the face of his alleged counterexamples and parodies.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. Robert E. Maydole (2009). The Ontological Argument. In William Lane Craig & J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Blackwell Pub 553--592.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  63
    Robert E. Maydole (2000). The Modal Third Way. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47 (1):1-28.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  45
    Robert Maydole (2005). On Metcalf 's Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument. Philo 8 (2):123-130.
    This paper is a reply to Graham Oppy’s “Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument,” published in Philo 7, 2 (2004). I argue that he fails to refute myModal Perfection Argument for the existence of a Supreme Being, and that it remains arguably sound in the face of his alleged counterexamples and parodies.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  41
    Robert E. Maydole (1980). A Modal Model for Proving the Existence of God. American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (2):135 - 142.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  13
    Robert E. Maydole (2012). On Grim's Cantorian Anti-Ontological Argument. In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag 50--367.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  22
    Robert Maydole (2005). On Metcalf 's Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument. Philo 8 (2):123-130.
    This paper is a reply to Graham Oppy’s “Maydole’s 2QS5 Argument,” published in Philo 7, 2 (2004). I argue that he fails to refute myModal Perfection Argument for the existence of a Supreme Being, and that it remains arguably sound in the face of his alleged counterexamples and parodies.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  3
    Robert E. Maydole (2015). On the Anti-Ontological Doom Argument. In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), God, Truth, and Other Enigmas. De Gruyter 29-32.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  18
    Robert E. Maydole (1975). Paradoxes and Many-Valued Set Theory. Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (3):269 - 291.
  11. Robert E. Maydole (2012). Ontological Arguments Redux. In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag 50--469.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography