43 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Robyn Anne Carston (University College London)
  1. Robyn Carston (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   44 citations  
  2.  64
    Robyn Carston (2013). Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics. In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics–Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press 261.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  3. Robyn Carston (2008). Linguistic Communication and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Synthese 165 (3):321-345.
    Most people working on linguistic meaning or communication assume that semantics and pragmatics are distinct domains, yet there is still little consensus on how the distinction is to be drawn. The position defended in this paper is that the semantics/pragmatics distinction holds between encoded linguistic meaning and speaker meaning. Two other ‘minimalist’ positions on semantics are explored and found wanting: Kent Bach’s view that there is a narrow semantic notion of context which is responsible for providing semantic values for a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  4. Robyn Carston, Informativeness, Relevance and Scalar Implicature.
    The idea is that, in a wide range of contexts, utterances of the sentences in (a) in each case will communicate the assumption in (b) in each case (or something closely akin to it, there being a certain amount of contextually governed variation in the speaker's propositional attitude and so the scope of the negation). These scalar inferences are taken to be one kind of (generalized) conversational implicature. As is the case with pragmatic inference quite generally, these inferences are defeasible (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  5. Robyn Carston (2010). Metaphor: Ad Hoc Concepts, Literal Meaning and Mental Images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3pt3):295-321.
    I propose that an account of metaphor understanding which covers the full range of cases has to allow for two routes or modes of processing. One is a process of rapid, local, on-line concept construction that applies quite generally to the recovery of word meaning in utterance comprehension. The other requires a greater focus on the literal meaning of sentences or texts, which is metarepresented as a whole and subjected to more global, reflective pragmatic inference. The questions whether metaphors convey (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  6. Robyn Carston & Deidre Wilson (2006). Metaphor, Relevance and the `Emergent Property' Issue. Mind and Language 21 (3):404--433.
  7. Deirdre Wilson & Robyn Carston (2006). Metaphor, Relevance and the 'Emergent Property' Issue. Mind and Language 21 (3):404–433.
    The interpretation of metaphorical utterances often results in the attribution of emergent properties, which are neither standardly associated with the individual constituents in isolation nor derivable by standard rules of semantic composition. An adequate pragmatic account of metaphor interpretation must explain how these properties are derived. Using the framework of relevance theory, we propose a wholly inferential account, and argue that the derivation of emergent properties involves no special interpretive mechanisms not required for the interpretation of ordinary, literal utterances.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  8. Robyn Carston, Metalinguistic Negation and Echoic Use.
    What I hope to achieve in this paper is some rather deeper understanding of the semantic and pragmatic properties of utterances which are said to involve the phenomenon of metalinguistic negation[FN1]. According to Laurence Horn, who has been primarily responsible for drawing our attention to it, this is a special non-truthfunctional use of the negation operator, which can be glossed as 'I object to U' where U is a linguistic utterance. This is to be distinguished from descriptive truthfunctional negation which (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  9. Robyn Carston (2002). Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive Pragmatics. Mind and Language 17 (1&2):127–148.
    Within the philosophy of language, pragmatics has tended to be seen as an adjunct to, and a means of solving problems in, semantics. A cognitive-scientific conception of pragmatics as a mental processing system responsible for interpreting ostensive communicative stimuli (specifically, verbal utterances) has effected a transformation in the pragmatic issues pursued and the kinds of explanation offered. Taking this latter perspective, I compare two distinct proposals on the kinds of processes, and the architecture of the system(s), responsible for the recovery (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  10. Robyn Carston & Gower Street, Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.
    Most people working on linguistic meaning or communication assume that semantics and pragmatics are distinct domains, yet there is still little consensus on how the distinction is to be drawn. The position defended in this paper is that the semantics/pragmatics distinction holds between (context-invariant) encoded linguistic meaning and speaker meaning. Two other ‘minimalist’ positions on semantics are explored and found wanting: Kent Bach’s view that there is a narrow semantic notion of context which is responsible for providing semantic values for (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  11.  17
    Robyn Carston (1987). Multiple Review. Mind and Language 2 (4):333-349.
    Gavagai! or the Future History of the Animal Language Controversy. By DAVID PREMACK.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  12.  4
    Hanoch Ben-Yami, Robyn Carston & Markus Werning (forthcoming). Introduction to the 2nd Synthese Special Issue: Trends in Philosophy of Language and Mind. Synthese:1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Robyn Carston, Explicature and Semantics.
    A standard view of the semantics of natural language sentences or utterances is that a sentence has a particular logical structure and is assigned truth-conditional content on the basis of that structure. Such a semantics is assumed to be able to capture the logical properties of sentences, including necessary truth, contradiction and valid inference; our knowledge of these properties is taken to be part of our semantic competence as native speakers of the language. The following examples pose a problem for (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14.  58
    Robyn Carston (2012). Metaphor and the Literal–Nonliteral Distinction. In Keith Allan & Kasia Jaszczolt (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press 469--492.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Deirdre Wilson & Robyn Carston (2007). A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad Hoc Concepts. In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan 3.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  16. Robyn Carston (2004). Truth-Conditional Content and Conversational Implicature. In Claudia Bianchi (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Csli 65--100.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17. Robyn Carston (1999). The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction: A View From Relevance Theory. In Ken Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface From Different Points of View. Elsevier 85125.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18. Robyn Carston (1998). Negation, `Presupposition' and the Semantics/ Pragmatics Distinction. Journal of Linguistics 34:309-350.
    A cognitive pragmatic approach is taken to some long-standing problem cases of negation, the so-called presupposition denial cases. It is argued that a full account of the processes and levels of representation involved in their interpretation typically requires the sequential pragmatic derivation of two different propositions expressed. The first is one in which the presupposition is preserved and, following the rejection of this, the second involves the echoic (metalinguistic) use of material falling in the scope of the negation. The semantic (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  19. Robyn Carston (forthcoming). The Architecture of the Mind: Modularity and Modularization. Cognitive Science: An Introduction.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Robyn Carston & George Powell (2006). Relevance Theory - New Directions and Developments. In Ernest Lepore & Barry Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press 341--360.
    As a post-Gricean pragmatic theory, Relevance Theory (RT) takes as its starting point the question of how hearers bridge the gap between sentence meaning and speaker meaning. That there is such a gap has been a given of linguistic philosophy since Grice’s (1967) Logic and Conversation. But the account that relevance theory offers of how this gap is bridged, although originating as a development of Grice’s co-operative principle and conversational maxims, differs from other broadly Gricean accounts in certain fundamental respects, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Robyn Carston, Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed?
    Within relevance theory the two local pragmatic processes of enrichment and loosening of linguistically encoded conceptual material have been given quite distinct treatments. Enrichments of various sorts, including those which involve a logical strengthening of a lexical concept, contribute to the proposition expressed by the utterance, hence to its truth-conditions. Loosenings, including metaphorical uses, do not enter into the proposition expressed by the utterance or affect its truth-conditions; they stand in a relation of 'interpretive resemblance' with the linguistically encoded concept (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22. Robyn Carston (2004). Relevance Theory and the Saying/Implicating Distinction. In . 155--181.
    It is widely accepted that there is a distinction to be made between the explicit content and the implicit import of an utterance. There is much less agreement about the precise nature of this distinction, how it is to be drawn, and whether any such two-way distinction can do justice to the levels and kinds of meaning involved in utterance interpretation. Grice’s distinction between what is said by an utterance and what is implicated is probably the best known instantiation of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Robyn Carston (2007). How Many Pragmatic Systems Are There? In María José Frápolli (ed.), Saying, Meaning and Referring: Essays on François Recanati's Philosophy of Language. Palgrave Macmillan
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  22
    Deirdre Wilson & Robyn Carston (2008). Metaphor and the 'Emergent Property' Problem: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3.
    The interpretation of metaphorical utterances often results in the attribution of emergent properties; these are properties which are neither standardly associated with the individual constituents of the utterance in isolation nor derivable by standard rules of semantic composition. For example, an utterance of ‘Robert is a bulldozer’ may be understood as attributing to Robert such properties as single-mindedness, insistence on having things done in his way, and insensitivity to the opinions/feelings of others, although none of these is included in the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25. Robyn Carston, Metaphor, Ad Hoc Concepts and Word Meaning - More Questions Than Answers.
    Recent work in relevance-theoretic pragmatics develops the idea that understanding verbal utterances involves processes of ad hoc concept construction. The resulting concepts may be narrower or looser than the lexical concepts which provide the input to the process. Two of the many issues that arise are considered in this paper: (a) the applicability of the idea to the understanding of metaphor, and (b) the extent to which lexical forms are appropriately thought of as encoding concepts.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Robyn Carston, Introduction: Representation and Metarepresentation.
    “Utterances and thoughts have content: They represent (actual or imaginary) states of affairs.” This is the opening statement of François Recanati’s most sustained work on kinds of representation, Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta (2000) and it presents the core phenomenon which it is the task of the philosophy of language to explain. A primary function of language and thought, though not their only function, is to represent how things are or might be. As well as descriptively representing entities, properties, and states (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  15
    Paula Rubio-Fernández, Catherine Wearing & Robyn Carston (2015). Metaphor and Hyperbole: Testing the Continuity Hypothesis. Metaphor and Symbol 30 (1):24-40.
    In standard Relevance Theory, hyperbole and metaphor are categorized together as loose uses of language, on a continuum with approximations, category extensions and other cases of loosening/broadening of meaning. Specifically, it is claimed that there are no interesting differences between hyperbolic and metaphorical uses. In recent work, we have set out to provide a more fine-grained articulation of the similarities and differences between hyperbolic and metaphorical uses and their relation to literal uses. We have defended the view that hyperbolic use (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Robyn Carston, Making Connections – Linguistic or Pragmatic?
    In (1), the talking event described in the matrix clause is elaborated on in the following adjunct: the arguing about the data and the theories makes up the content of the talking referred to in the matrix clause. In (2), on the other hand, the events (or sub-events of a single complex event) described are in a causeconsequence relation, a result of the action described in the matrix clause being that the porcelain vase breaks. These two examples illustrate a central (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Robyn Carston & Gower Street, The Relationship Between Generative Grammar and (Relevance-Theoretic) Pragmatics.
    The generative grammar approach to language seeks a fully explicit account of the modular systems of knowledge (competence) that underlies the human language capacity. Similarly, the relevance-theoretic approach to pragmatics attempts an explicit characterisation of the sub-personal systems involved in utterance interpretation. As an on-line performance system, however, it is subject to certain additional constraints; this is demonstrated by the way in which matters of computational (processing effort) economy are currently employed in the two types of theory. A sub-module of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Robyn Carston, To Appear in Journal of Linguistics.
    The basic thesis of this book is that there is a level of utterance-type meaning, which is distinct from, and intermediate between, sentence-type meaning and utterance-token meaning. That is, it is more than encoded linguistic meaning but generally less than the full interpretation of an utterance. Here are some examples, where (a) is a sentence and (b) is its utterance-type meaning in each case.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  1
    Deirdre Wilson & Robyn Carston (2006). Metaphor, Relevance and the 'Emergent Property' Issue. Mind Language 21 (3):404-433.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. Robyn Carston, A Response to Noel Burton-Roberts.
    Metalinguistic negation is interesting for at least the following two reasons: it is one instance of the much broader, very widespread and various, phenomenon of metarepresentational use in linguistic communication, whose semantic and pragmatic properties are currently being extensively explored by both linguists and philosophers of language; it plays a central role in recent accounts of presupposition-denial cases, such as "The king of France is not bald; there is no king of France". It is this latter employment that discussion of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  40
    Robyn Carston (2008). Minimal Semantics - by Emma Borg. Mind and Language 23 (3):359–367.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  5
    Robyn Carston (1987). Being Explicit. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):713.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  26
    Robyn Carston, Samuel Guttenplan & Deirdre Wilson (2002). Introduction: Special Issue on Pragmatics and Cognitive Science. Mind and Language 17 (1&2):1–2.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Robyn Carston & Diane Blakemore, Introduction: Neil Smith's Linguistics.
    Neil Smith has worked across the full range of the discipline of linguistics and explored its interfaces with other disciplines. In all this work he has maintained a commitment to a mentalist approach to the study of language and communication. The aim of this Special Issue is to honour his work and commitment with a collection of papers which brings together work by phonologists, syntacticians, psycholinguists, and pragmatists who share this interest in language as a central component of the human (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  2
    Deirdre Wilson & Robyn Carston (2007). Metaphor and the 'Emergent Property' Problem: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Robyn Carston (2008). A Review of E. Borg, 2004. Minimal Semantics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [REVIEW] Mind and Language 23:359-67.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Robyn Carston (2004). .
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Robyn Carston & Alison Hall (2012). Implicature and Explicature. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics. 47-84.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Robyn Carston (1988). Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics. In Ruth M. Kempson (ed.), Mental representations: The interface between language and reality. Cambridge Univ. Press 155–181.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Robyn Carston (1998). Postscript (1995) to "Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics". In Asa Kasher (ed.), Pragmatics: Critical Concepts: Volume IV: Presupposition, Implicature and Indirect Speech Acts. Routledge 464-479.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Robyn Carston & George Powell (2008). Relevance Theory. In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. OUP Oxford
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography