10 found
Sort by:
  1.  9 DLs
    Sean M. Barnes, Steven Jay Lynn & Ronald J. Pekala (2009). Not All Group Hypnotic Suggestibility Scales Are Created Equal: Individual Differences in Behavioral and Subjective Responses☆. Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1):255-265.
    To examine the influence of hypnotic suggestibility testing as a source of individual differences in hypnotic responsiveness, we compared behavioral and subjective responses on three scales of hypnotic suggestibility: The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A . Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. Berlin: Consulting Psychologists Press); the Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale . The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports, 53, 523–535); and the Group Scale of Hypnotic Ability . (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2.  7 DLs
    Lisa N. Woodside, V. K. Kumar & Ronald J. Pekala (1997). Monotonous Percussion Drumming and Trance Postures: A Controlled Evaluation of Phenomenological Effects. Anthropology of Consciousness 8 (2‐3):69-87.
  3.  4 DLs
    Ronald J. Pekala & Levine R. L. Wenger C. F. (1985). Individual Differences in Phenomenological Experience: States of Consciousness as a Function of Absorption. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48:125-32.
  4.  0 DLs
    Ronald J. Pekala & V. K. Kumar (2000). Individual Differences in Patterns of Hypnotic Experience Across Low and High Hypnotically Susceptible Individuals. In (R. Kunzendorf & B. Wallace, Eds) Individual Differences in Conscious Experience. [REVIEW] John Benjamins.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5.  0 DLs
    Ronald J. Pekala & V. K. Kumar (1989). Phenomenological Patterns of Consciousness During Hypnosis: Relevance to Cognition and Individual Differences. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 17:1-20.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6.  0 DLs
    Ronald J. Pekala & V. K. Kumar (2007). An Empirical—Phenomenological Approach to Quantifying Consciousness. In Graham A. Jamieson (ed.), Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Oxford University Press 167.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7.  0 DLs
    Ronald J. Pekala & E. Cardena (2000). Methodological Issues in the Study of Altered States of Consciousness and Anomalous Experiences. In E. Cardena & S. Lynn (eds.), Varieties of Anomalous Experience: Examining the Scientific Evidence. American Psychological Association
  8.  0 DLs
    Ronald J. Pekala & R. L. Levine (1982). Mapping Consciousness: Development of an Empirical-Phenomenological Approach. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 1:29-47.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9.  0 DLs
    Ronald J. Pekala & V. K. Kumar (2007). An Empirical-Phenomenological Approach to Quantifying Consciousness and States of Consciousness: With Particular Reference to Understanding the Nature of Hypnosis. In Graham A. Jamieson (ed.), Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Oxford University Press 167-194.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10.  0 DLs
    Ronald J. Pekala & V. K. Kumar (2000). Individual Differences in Patterns of Hypnotic Experience Across Low and High Hypnotically Susceptible Individuals. In Robert G. Kunzendorf & Benjamin Wallace (eds.), Individual Differences in Conscious Experience. John Benjamins 309-335.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation