Search results for 'Ronald K. Stamper' (try it on Scholar)

5 found
Sort by:
  1. Ronald K. Stamper (1991). The Role of Semantics in Legal Expert Systems and Legal Reasoning. Ratio Juris 4 (2):219-244.score: 870.0
    The consensus among legal philosophers is probably that rule-based legal expert systems leave much to be desired as aids in legal decision-making. Why? What can we do about it? A bureaucrat administering some set of complex rules will ascertain the facts and apply the rules to them in order to discover their consequences for the case in hand. This process of deductive reasoning is characteristically bureaucratic.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. M. Pohl, O. Rosas, E. H. Spence, J. Stamper, D. Taraborelli, M. Turilli, J. Vallverdú, J. Li & D. Weiller (2008). Allo, P. 79 Arkin, RC 45 Asaro, PM 50 Barnes, T. 145 Brey, P. 91 Bringsjord, S. 156 Casacuberta, D. 103 Croy, M. 145 Fischer, B. 133 Ishii, K. 35 Lanzenberger, M. 184 McKinlay, S. Müller, VC Noorman, M. Piwek, L. [REVIEW] In P. Brey, A. Briggle & K. Waelbers (eds.), Current Issues in Computing and Philosophy. Ios Press. 205.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ronald Stamper, James Backhouse & Karl Althaus (1987). Expert Systems: Lawyers Beware! Theoria 3 (1):317-340.score: 240.0
    Two fundamental paradigms are in conflict. Expert systems are the creation of the artificial intelligence paradigm which presumes that an objective reality can be understood and controlled by an individual expert intelligence that can be replaced by machinery. The alternative paradigm assumes that reality is the subjective product of human beings striving to collaborate through shared norms and experiences, a process that can be assisted by but never replaced by computers. The first paradigm is appropriate in the domains of natural (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ronald Stamper (1988). Pathologies of AI: Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Professional Work. [REVIEW] AI and Society 2 (1):3-16.score: 240.0
    Although the AI paradigm is useful for building knowledge-based systems for the applied natural sciences, there are dangers when it is extended into the domains of business, law and other social systems. It is misleading to treat knowledge as a commodity that can be separated from the context in which it is regularly used. Especially when it relates to social behaviour, knowledge should be treated as socially constructed, interpreted and maintained through its practical use in context. The meanings of terms (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. R. K. Stamper (1991). The Role of Semantics in Legal Expert Reasoning and Legal Systems. Ratio Juris 2 (4):219-44.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation