12 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Ronald P. Loui [11]Ronald Prescott Loui [1]
  1. Ronald P. Loui, Concepts and Ascriptivism.
    Hart’s "Ascription of Responsibility and Rights" is where we find perhaps the first clear pronouncement of defeasibility and the technical introduction of the term. The paper has been criticised, disavowed, and never quite fully redeemed. Its lurid history is now being used as an excuse for dismissing the importance of defeasibility.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ronald P. Loui, Departamento de Econom a, Universidad Del Sur, Argentina.
    Carlos Alchourron was a scholar in the old tradition, with a vast culture and a passion for knowledge. His initial research, with Eugenio Bulygin on Normative Systems ( Alchourron-Bulygin 71]), led him to the realization that legal reasoning is actually representative of a more general kind of reasoning. He subsequently concluded that classical mathematical logic was not appropiate for formalizing this ampliative and non-deterministic kind of reasoning. His line of attack shows clearly in the characteristics of the AGM system of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ronald P. Loui, Hart's Critics On Defeasible Concepts and Ascriptivism.
    Hart's "Ascription of Responsibility and Rights" is where we find perhaps the first clear pronouncement of defeasibility and the technical introduction of the term. The paper has been criticised, disavowed, and never quite fully redeemed. Its lurid history is now being used as an excuse for dismissing the importance of defeasibility.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ronald P. Loui & Diana M. Moore, Dialogue and Deliberation.
    Formal accounts of negotiation tend to invoke the strategic models of conflict which have been impressively developed by game theorists in this half-century. For two decades, however, research on artificial intelligence (AI) has produced a different formal picture of the agent and of the rational deliberations of agents. AI's models are not based simply on intensities of preference and quantities of probability. AI's models consider that agents use language in various ways, that agents use and convey knowledge, that agents plan, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ronald Prescott Loui, Carlos Ivan Ches~Nevar & Ana Gabriela Maguitman, Logical Models of Argument.
    Logical models of argument formalize commonsense reasoning while taking process and computation seriously. This survey discusses the main ideas which characterize di erent logical models of argument. It presents the formal features of a few main approaches to the modeling of argumentation. We trace the evolution of argumentationfrom the mid-80's, when argumentsystems emerged as an alternative to nonmonotonic formalisms based on classical logic, to the present, as argument is embedded in di erent complex systems for real-world applications, and allows more (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Trevor Bench-Capon, Michał Araszkiewicz, Kevin Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, Daniele Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Jack G. Conrad, Enrico Francesconi, Thomas F. Gordon, Guido Governatori, Jochen L. Leidner, David D. Lewis, Ronald P. Loui, L. Thorne McCarty, Henry Prakken, Frank Schilder, Erich Schweighofer, Paul Thompson, Alex Tyrrell, Bart Verheij, Douglas N. Walton & Adam Z. Wyner (2012). A History of AI and Law in 50 Papers: 25 Years of the International Conference on AI and Law. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (3):215-319.
    We provide a retrospective of 25 years of the International Conference on AI and Law, which was first held in 1987. Fifty papers have been selected from the thirteen conferences and each of them is described in a short subsection individually written by one of the 24 authors. These subsections attempt to place the paper discussed in the context of the development of AI and Law, while often offering some personal reactions and reflections. As a whole, the subsections build into (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ronald P. Loui (2005). A Citation-Based Reflection on Toulmin and Argument. Argumentation 19 (3):259-266.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ronald P. Loui (2001). Jaap Hage, Reasoning with Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and its Underlying Logic. Law and Philosophy Library. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (4):353-358.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Ronald P. Loui & David B. Skalak (1995). Book Review. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (1-2):143-150.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Ronald P. Loui (1991). Dialectic, Computation, and Ampliative Inference. In Robert C. Cummins (ed.), Philosophy and Ai. Cambridge: Mit Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Ronald P. Loui (1987). Response to Hanks and McDermott: Temporal Evolution of Beliefs and Beliefs About Temporal Evolution. Cognitive Science 11 (3):283-297.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Ronald P. Loui (1986). Decisions with Indeterminate Probabilities. Theory and Decision 21 (3):283-309.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation