6 found
Sort by:
  1. Roxana Baiasu (2014). How is Philosophy Supposed to Engage with Religion? Heidegger's Philosophical Atheism and Its Limits. Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (1):113-136.
    The paper addresses two related questions: 1. the much debated issue concerning philosophy's proper way of engaging with religion, and 2. the extent to which religious concerns belong to our existence. If philosophy is understood as the hermeneutics of existence, that is, as the self-interpretation of existence, as the early Heidegger proposes, then the way the second question is answered bears on the approach to the first issue. While endorsing Heidegger's claim in the 1920s that philosophy should be autonomous and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Roxana Baiasu (2014). Knowing How to Talk About What Cannot Be Said: Objectivity and Epistemic Locatedness. Sophia 53 (2):215-229.
    I take it that A. W. Moore is right when he said that ‘Wittgenstein was right: some things cannot be put into words. Moreover, some things that cannot be put into words are of the utmost philosophical importance’. There is, however, a constant threat of self-stultification whenever an attempt is made to put the ineffable into words. As Pamela Sue Anderson notes in Re-visioning gender in philosophy of religion: reason, love, and epistemic locatedness, certain recent approaches to ineffability—including Moore’s approach—attempt (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Roxana Baiasu, Graham Bird & A. W. Moore (eds.) (2012). Contemporary Kantian Metaphysics: New Essays on Time and Space. Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Roxana Baiasu (2009). Heidegger's Topology: Being, Place, World, by Jeff Malpas. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):315-323.
  5. Roxana Baiasu (2009). Puzzles of Discourse in Being and Time : Minding Gaps in Understanding. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (5):681-706.
    This paper takes issue with Heidegger's claim that discourse and understanding are equally basic in the constitution of our making sense of the world. I argue that Heidegger cannot consistently establish this claim, and that discourse can be thought of as being more basic than understanding. The proposed line of thinking has the advantage of shedding light on both the finitude and the normativity of our making sense of the world. Thus, by setting up an exchange with the later Wittgenstein's (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Roxana Baiasu (2007). Being and Time and the Problem of Space. Research in Phenomenology 37 (3):324-356.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation