Search results for 'Roxann K. Blackburn' (try it on Scholar)

10 found
Sort by:
  1. Martin L. Smith, Annette K. Bisanz, Ana J. Kempfer, Barbie Adams, Toya G. Candelari & Roxann K. Blackburn (2004). Criteria for Determining the Appropriate Method for an Ethics Consultation. HEC Forum 16 (2):95-113.score: 290.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. William K. Blackburn (1988). Wettstein on Definite Descriptions. Philosophical Studies 53 (2):263 - 278.score: 120.0
    I critically examine an argument, due to howard wettstein, purporting to show that sentences containing definite descriptions are semantically ambiguous between referential and attributive readings. Wettstein argues that many sentences containing nonidentifying descriptions--descriptions that apply to more than one object--cannot be given a Russellian analysis, and that the descriptions in these sentences should be understood as directly referential terms. But because Wettstein does not justify treating referential uses of nonidentifying descriptions differently than attributive uses of nonidentifying descriptions, his argument fails.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. William K. Blackburn (1983). Ambiguity and Non-Specificity: A Reply to Jay David Atlas. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 6 (4):479 - 498.score: 120.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. William K. Blackburn (1987). Davidson on Force and Convention. Analysis 47 (2):72-74.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. B. Aldag, G. Antoniou, T. Aoto, P. Blackburn, K. Britz, M. Brown, A. Bundy, R. Cox, M. De Rijke & S. Demri (1999). Index of Authors of Volume 8. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 8 (485):485.score: 120.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. William K. Blackburn (1986). John Searle and Daniel Vanderveken, Foundations of Illocutionary Logic Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 6 (7):354-356.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Edith A. Nutescu, Hayley Y. Park, Surrey M. Walton, Juan C. Blackburn, Jamie M. Finley, Richard K. Lewis & Glen T. Schumock (2005). Factors That Influence Prescribing Within a Therapeutic Drug Class. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (4):357-365.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Krysia Broda (2008). Review of P. Blackburn, J. Bos, and K. Striegnitz, Learn Prolog Now!. [REVIEW] Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (2).score: 36.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stephen Finlay & Terence Cuneo (2008). Teaching & Learning Guide For: Moral Realism and Moral Nonnaturalism. Philosophy Compass 3 (3):570-572.score: 12.0
    Metaethics is a perennially popular subject, but one that can be challenging to study and teach. As it consists in an array of questions about ethics, it is really a mix of (at least) applied metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of language, and mind. The seminal texts therefore arise out of, and often assume competence with, a variety of different literatures. It can be taught thematically, but this sample syllabus offers a dialectical approach, focused on metaphysical debate over moral realism, which spans (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. N. K. Rutter (1990). Keith F. Sugden: Sylloge Nummorum Graecorum, Vol. VIII: The Hart Collection, Blackburn Museum. 56 Plates. Oxford University Press, for the British Academy, 1989. £40. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (02):518-519.score: 12.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation