81 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Rupert Read [73]Rupert J. Read [8]
See also:
Profile: Rupert Read (University of East Anglia)
  1. Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2014). What’s Wrong with GM Food? The Philosophers' Magazine 65:39-45.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Rupert Read (2014). Uncertainty – the Philosophical Problem of Our Time. The Philosophers' Magazine 66:100-105.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Odai Al Zoubi & Rupert Read (2013). Unrest Uprising, or Revolution? Philosophers' Magazine 60 (-1):28 - 29.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Rupert Read (2013). Craig Taylor, Moralism: A Study of a Vice (Durham: Acumen, 2012). Xi + 187, Price £11.99. [REVIEW] Philosophical Investigations 36 (2):179-184.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Rupert Read (2013). Feminism and Trans-Women. The Philosophers' Magazine 61 (61):26-28.
  6. Rupert Read & Timur Uçan (2013). Wittgenstein's Metaphilosophy. By Paul Horwich. Oxford University Press, 2012, Xv+225pp, £16.99. ISBN-10: 019966112X; ISBN-13: 978-0199661121. [REVIEW] Philosophy:1-6.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Rupert Read & Jessica Woolley (2013). Wittgenstein in Exile by James C. Klagge (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (3):499-500.
    James Klagge aims to shed light on Wittgenstein’s philosophy by situating it in its biographical–cultural context. While Klagge is not alone in pursuing this aim, his claim to originality lies in his thematic focus on Wittgenstein’s relationship to his time and culture as one of “alienation” (3), expressed by the metaphor of being “in exile” (61). A central concern of Klagge’s is how we, as modern readers living in a “civilized” culture not dissimilar to the one from which Wittgenstein felt (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Rupert Read (2012). A Wittgensteinian Way with Paradoxes. Lexington Books.
    A Wittgensteinian way with paradoxes tackles some of the classic philosophical paradoxes that have puzzled philosophers over the centuries and explores how they can be dissolved using the ‘therapeutic’ method of Wittgenstein, according to the ‘resolute’ reading of the latter’s work. The book shows how, by contrast, we should give more serious consideration to real, ‘lived paradoxes’, some of which can be harmful psychically, morally or politically, but others of which can be beneficial.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Rupert Read (2012). Guardians of the Future. The Philosophers' Magazine 57 (57):27-28.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Rupert Read (2012). Iain McGilchrist, The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2010). [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (1):119-124.
    Iain McGilchrist, The master and his emissary: the divided brain and the making of the Western world (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2010) Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 119-124 DOI 10.1007/s11097-011-9235-x Authors Rupert Read, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK Journal Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Online ISSN 1572-8676 Print ISSN 1568-7759 Journal Volume Volume 11 Journal Issue Volume 11, Number 1.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Rupert Read & Wes Sharrock (2012). 4 Kuhn's Fundamental Insight. In Vasō Kintē & Theodore Arabatzis (eds.), Kuhn's the Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. Routledge. 64.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2011). De‐Mystifying Tacit Knowing and Clues: A Comment on Henry Et Al. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):944-947.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Rupert Read (2011). A Strengthened Ethical Version of Moore's Paradox? Lived Paradoxes of Self-Loathing in Psychosis and Neurosis. Philosophical Psychology 25 (1):133 - 141.
    Wittgenstein once remarked: ?nobody can truthfully say of himself that he is filth. Because if I do say it, though it can be true in a sense, this is not a truth by which I myself can be penetrated: otherwise I should either have to go mad or change myself.? This has an immediate corollary, previously unnoted: that it may be true that someone is simply filth?a rotten person through and through?and also true that they don?t believe that they are (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Rupert Read (2011). On Future People. Think 10 (29):43-47.
    It is no longer socially-acceptable to exhibit prejudice against ethnic minority people on grounds of their ethnicity, women on grounds of their gender, or working-class people on grounds of their class. The last bastions of discrimination are being overcome: such as prejudice against gay and lesbian people, and against disabled people. …Or, is there one more, crucial bastion of discrimination still strongly in place?
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Rupert Read (2011). Religion as Sedition: On Liberalism’s Intolerance of Real Religion. Ars Disputandi 11.
    ‘Political liberalism’ claims to manifest the real meaning of democracy, including crucially the toleration of religion – it is through the history of this toleration that it acquired its current form and power. Political liberalism is however, I argue, more hostile to religion than was ever dreamt possible in the philosophy of avowedly anti-clerical Enlightenment Liberalism. For it refuses point-blank ever to engage in serious debate with religion. It considers it of no consequence. It allows religion only to be ‘outward (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Rupert Read (2011). The Difference Principle is Not Action-Guiding. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):487-503.
    Utilitarianism would allow any degree of inequality whatsoever productive of the greatest happiness of the greatest number. But it does not guide political action, because determining what level of inequality would produce the greatest happiness of the greatest number is opaque due to well-known psychological coordination problems. Does Rawlsian liberalism, as is generally assumed, have some superiority to Utilitarianism in this regard? This paper argues not; for Rawls?s ?difference principle? would allow any degree of inequality whatsoever that best raises up (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Rupert Read (2011). Why There Cannot Be Any Such Thing as “Time Travel”. Philosophical Investigations 35 (2):138-153.
    Extending work of Wittgenstein, Lakoff and Johnson I suggest that it is the (spatial) metaphors we rely on in order to conceptualise time that provide an illusory space for time-travel-talk. For example, in the “Moving Time” spatialisation of time, “objects” move past the agent from the future to the past. The objects all move in the same direction – this is mapped to time always moving in the same direction. But then it is easy to imagine suspending this rule, and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Rupert J. Read (2011). Wittgenstein Among the Sciences: Wittgensteinian Investigations Into the "Scientific Method". Ashgate.
    Acknowledgments -- Preface -- Editor's introduction -- Wittgenstein, Kuhn, and natural science : science : a perspicuous presentation -- Kuhn : the Wittgenstein of the sciences? -- Kuhn on incommensurability : inhabiting the standard reading -- Wittgenstein on incommensurability : the view from "inside" -- Values : another kind of incommensurability? -- Does Kuhn have a model of science? -- Inter-section : a schematic elicitation of Wittgensteinian criteria -- Wittgenstein, Winch, and "human science" : social science -- The ghost of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Rupert J. Read & Matthew A. Lavery (eds.) (2011). Beyond the Tractatus Wars: The New Wittgenstein Debate. Routledge.
    Over fifteen years have passed since Cora Diamond and James Conant turned Wittgenstein scholarship upside down with the program of “resolute” reading, and ten years since this reading was crystallized in the major collection The New Wittgenstein . This approach remains at the center of the debate about Wittgenstein and his philosophy, and this book draws together the latest thinking of the world’s leading Tractatarian scholars and promising newcomers. Showcasing one piece alternately from each “camp”, Beyond the Tractatus Wars pairs (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jon Cook & Rupert Read (2010). Wittgenstein and Literary Language. In Garry Hagberg & Walter Jost (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature. Wiley-Blackwell.
  21. Rupert Read (2010). The Carbon Credit Crunch. The Philosophers' Magazine 51 (51):46-49.
    Those of us contemplating jetting off to a philosophy conference abroad really do need to ask ourselves how much good we would really be doing by going and whether we can justify the harm that we are certainly responsible for if we go.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Rupert Read (2009). Extreme Aversive Emotions: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Dread. In Ylva Gustafsson, Camilla Kronqvist & Michael McEachrane (eds.), Emotions and Understanding: Wittgensteinian Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan. 221.
  23. Rupert Read (2009). Wittgenstein and Zen Buddhism: One Practice, No Dogma. In Mario D'Amato, Jay L. Garfield & Tom J. F. Tillemans (eds.), Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 13--23.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2008). Toward a Perspicuous Presentation of "Perspicuous Presentation". Philosophical Investigations 31 (2):141–160.
    Gordon Baker in his last decade published a series of papers (now collected in Baker 2004), which are revolutionary in their proposals for understanding of later Wittgenstein. Taking our lead from the first of those papers, on "perspicuous presentations," we offer new criticisms of 'elucidatory' readers of later Wittgenstein, such as Peter Hacker: we argue that their readings fail to connect with the radically therapeutic intent of the 'perspicuous presentation' concept, as an achievement-term, rather than a kind of 'objective' mapping (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Rupert Read & Kenneth Richman (eds.) (2008). The New Hume Debate: Revised Edition. Routledge.
    For decades scholars thought they knew Hume's position on the existence of causes and objects he was a sceptic. However, this received view has been thrown into question by the `new readings of Hume as a sceptical realist. For philosophers, students of philosophy and others interested in theories of causation and their history, The New Hume Debate is the first book to fully document the most influential contemporary readings of Hume's work. Throughout, the volume brings the debate beyond textual issues (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Rupert Read (2007). The Enchantment of Words. [REVIEW] Philosophy 82 (4):657-661.
    This book is a piece of philosophical work of extremely high intellectual quality. Its purpose is to defend in detail a ‘resolute’ reading of the Tractatus. It succeeds in this aim. It thus accomplishes something that has not yet been accomplished even by Conant or Diamond. It is therefore a major contribution to ‘Wittgenstein studies’, to contemporary philosophy and to the philosophical history of recent philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Rupert Read (2007). Obituary: James Guetti, Philosophical Lettrist. Philosophy Now 60:18-18.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Rupert Read (2007). The Enchantment of Words: Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus Denis McManus Oxford: Clarendon 2006; Pp. XVI + 268. Philosophy 82 (4):657-661.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2006). An Elucidatory Interpretation of Wittgenstein's Tractatus: A Critique of Daniel D. Hutto's and Marie McGinn's Reading of Tractatus 6.54. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (1):1 – 29.
    Much has been written on the relative merits of different readings of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. The recent renewal of the debate has almost exclusively been concerned with variants of the ineffabilist (metaphysical) reading of TL-P - notable such readings have been advanced by Elizabeth Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and H. O. Mounce - and the recently advanced variants of therapeutic (resolute) readings - notable advocates of which are James Conant, Cora Diamond, Juliet Floyd and Michael Kremer. During this debate, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Rupert Read (2006). A No-Theory?: Against Hutto on Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations 29 (1):73–81.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Rupert Read (2006). Is Forgiveness Ever Possible at All? In David Rudrum (ed.), Literature and Philosophy: A Guide to Contemporary Debates. Palgrave Macmillan.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2005). Review: Review Article: Whose Wittgenstein? [REVIEW] Philosophy 80 (313):432 - 455.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Phil Hutchinson & Rupert Read (2005). Wittgenstein's Method: Neglected Aspects by Gordon Baker. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004 Pp. 328. £40.00 HB. (Hereafter: BWM). Wittgenstein's Copernican Revolution: The Question of Linguistic Idealism by Ilham Dilman. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. Pp. 240. £52.50 HB. (Hereafter: DWCR) Wittgenstein: Connections and Controversies by P. M. S. Hacker. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2001 [Pb 2004]). Pp. 400. £45.00 HB; £19.99 PB. (Hereafter: HWCC) Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: An Introduction by David G. Stern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. 224. £40.00 HB; £10.99 PB. (Hereafter: SWPI). [REVIEW] Philosophy 80 (3):432-455.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Rupert Read (2005). Iv *-Throwing Away 'the Bedrock'. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):81-98.
    If one is impressed with Wittgenstein's philosophizing, then it is a deep mistake to think that the terms that he made famous-philosophical terms like 'form of life', 'language-game', 'everyday', 'bedrock'-are the key to his philosophy. On the contrary, they are in the end an obstacle to be overcome. The last temptation of the Wittgensteinian philosopher is to treat these terms as providing a kind of ersatz foundation. They are rather a ladder that takes one... to where one already is, only (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Rupert Read & Jerry Goodenough (eds.) (2005). Film as Philosophy: Essays on Cinema After Wittgenstein and Cavell. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Rupert Read (2004). Throwing Away 'the Bedrock'. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):81–98.
    If one is impressed with Wittgenstein's philosophizing, then it is a deep mistake to think that the terms that he made famous-philosophical terms like 'form of life', 'language-game', 'everyday', 'bedrock'-are the key to his philosophy. On the contrary, they are in the end an obstacle to be overcome. The last temptation of the Wittgensteinian philosopher is to treat these terms as providing a kind of ersatz foundation. They are rather a ladder that takes one... to where one already is, only (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Rupert Read (2004). The Road Since ‘Structure’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):175-178.
  38. Rupert Read (2004). Wittgenstein and Faulkner's Benjy: Reflections on and of Derangement. In John Gibson Wolfgang Huemer (ed.), The Literary Wittgenstein. Routledge. 267--288.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Ian Hacking, Jean-Francois Braunstein, Antonia Soulez, Jean-Philippe Narboux, Miguel Coelho, Rupert Read & Sandra Laugier (2003). TS Kuhn, Après la Structure. Archives de Philosophie 66 (3):389-503.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Rupert Read (2003). Against 'Time–Slices'. Philosophical Investigations 26 (1):24–43.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Rupert Read (2003). Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy Edited by Juliet Floyd and Sanford Shieh Oxford University Press, 2001, 465+XV Pages. [REVIEW] Philosophy 78 (1):123-145.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Rupert Read (2003). Kripke's Hume. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 24 (1):103-121.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Rupert Read (2003). Kuhn : le Wittgenstein des sciences ? Archives de Philosophie 3:463-479.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Rupert Read (2003). Review: The Heart of What Matters: The Role for Literature in Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW] Mind 112 (447):506-509.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Rupert Read (2003). Thomas Kuhn. International Studies in Philosophy 35 (4):162-163.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Rupert Read (2003). Time to Stop Trying to Provide an Account of Time. Philosophy 78 (3):397-408.
    Dummett argues that there are difficulties with existing accounts of time, and urges us to consider the merits of his alternative ‘constructionist’ account. He derides my opting out of the debate between him and his Realist opponents as “quietist”. But the epithet “quietist” only works if there actually is some genuine topic on which I am staying quiet (or silencing others). Whereas I simply urge that, while Dummett has correctly identified difficulties with Realist accounts of time, he does not have (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Rupert J. Read (2003). Literature as Philosophy of Psychopathology: William Faulkner as Wittgenstein. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (2):115-124.
  48. Rupert J. Read (2003). On Delusions of Sense: A Response to Coetzee and Sass. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (2):135-141.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Rupert Read & Rob Deans (2003). "Nothing is Shown": A 'Resolute' Response to Mounce, Emiliani, Koethe and Vilhauer. Philosophical Investigations 26 (3):239–268.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Wes Sharrock & Rupert Read (2003). Does Thomas Kuhn Have a 'Model of Science'? Social Epistemology 17 (2-3):293-296.
1 — 50 / 81