Works by Ruth Faden ( view other items matching `Ruth Faden`, view all matches )
Disambiguations:
Ruth R. Faden [21]Ruth Faden [8]

29 found
Sort by:
  1. Ruth R. Faden, Tom L. Beauchamp & Nancy E. Kass (2011). Learning Health Care Systems and Justice. Hastings Center Report 41 (4).
    Emily Largent, Steven Joffe, and Franklin Miller offer a stimulating contribution to the literature on integrating medical research and practice. We agree on both the need to move toward what the Institute of Medicine has called a learning health care system and the need for new conceptions for integrating research and practice within it. We also agree with the authors’ view, first advanced by Robert Truog and colleagues in 1999, that it can be ethically acceptable to randomize patients without express (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ruth R. Faden, Margaret Olivia Little & Anne Drapkin Lyerly (2011). Reframing the Framework: Toward Fair Inclusion of Pregnant Women as Participants in Research. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):50-52.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ruth Faden & Madison Powers (2011). A Social Justice Framework for Health and Science Policy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (04):596-604.
  4. Sirine Shebaya, Andrea Sutherland, Orin Levine & Ruth Faden (2010). Alternatives to National Average Income Data as Eligibility Criteria for International Subsidies: A Social Justice Perspective. Developing World Bioethics 10 (3):141-149.
    Current strategies to address global inequities in access to life-saving vaccines use averaged national income data to determine eligibility. While largely successful in the lowest income countries, we argue that this approach could lead to significant inefficiencies from the standpoint of justice if applied to middle-income countries, where income inequalities are large and lead to national averages that obscure truly needy populations. Instead, we suggest alternative indicators more sensitive to social justice concerns that merit consideration by policy-makers developing new initiatives (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jeremy Sugarman, Nancy Kass & Ruth Faden (2009). Categorizing Empirical Research in Bioethics: Why Count the Ways? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):66-67.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Matthew J. Czarny, Ruth R. Faden, Marie T. Nolan, Edwin Bodensiek & Jeremy Sugarman (2008). Medical and Nursing Students' Television Viewing Habits: Potential Implications for Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):1 – 8.
    Television medical dramas frequently depict the practice of medicine and bioethical issues in a strikingly realistic but sometimes inaccurate fashion. Because these shows depict medicine so vividly and are so relevant to the career interests of medical and nursing students, they may affect these students' beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions regarding the practice of medicine and bioethical issues. We conducted a web-based survey of medical and nursing students to determine the medical drama viewing habits and impressions of bioethical issues depicted in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Matthew Czarny, Ruth Faden, Marie Nolan, Edwin Bodensiek & Jeremy Sugarman (2008). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Medical and Nursing Students' Television Viewing Habits: Potential Implications for Bioethics”. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):1-1.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth Faden (2008). The Second Wave: Toward Responsible Inclusion of Pregnant Women in Research. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):5 - 22.
    Though much progress has been made on inclusion of non-pregnant women in research, thoughtful discussion about including pregnant women has lagged behind. We outline resulting knowledge gaps and their costs and then highlight four reasons why ethically we are obliged to confront the challenges of including pregnant women in clinical research. These are: the need for effective treatment for women during pregnancy, fetal safety, harm from the reticence to prescribe potentially beneficial medication, and the broader issues of justice and access (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth R. Faden (2008). A Critique of the 'Fetus as Patient'. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):42 – 44.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth R. Faden (2008). Pregnancy and Clinical Research. Hastings Center Report 38 (6):3-3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Madison Powers & Ruth Faden (2008). Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy. OUP USA.
    In bioethics, discussions of justice have tended to focus on questions of fairness in access to health care: is there a right to medical treatment, and how should priorities be set when medical resources are scarce. But health care is only one of many factors that determine the extent to which people live healthy lives, and fairness is not the only consideration in determining whether a health policy is just. In this pathbreaking book, senior bioethicists Powers and Faden confront foundational (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Lori Uscher-Pines, Patrick S. Duggan, Joshua P. Garoon, Ruth A. Karron & Ruth R. Faden (2007). Planning for an Influenza Pandemic: Social Justice and Disadvantaged Groups. Hastings Center Report 37 (4):32-39.
    : Because an influenza pandemic would create the most serious hardships for those who already face most serious hardships, countries should take special measures to mitigate the effect of a pandemic on existing social inequalities. Unfortunately, there is little evidence that anybody is thinking about that.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ruth R. Faden (2004). Bioethics: A Field in Transition. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (2):276-278.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Carol Levine, Ruth Faden, Christine Grady, Dale Hammerschmidt, Lisa Eckenwiler & Jeremy Sugarman (2004). A Response to Commentators on “The Limitations of 'Vulnerability' as a Protection for Human Research Participants”. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):W32-W32.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Carol Levine, Ruth Faden, Christine Grady, Dale Hammerschmidt, Lisa Eckenwiler & Jeremy Sugarman (2004). The Limitations of "Vulnerability" as a Protection for Human Research Participants. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):44 – 49.
    Vulnerability is one of the least examined concepts in research ethics. Vulnerability was linked in the Belmont Report to questions of justice in the selection of subjects. Regulations and policy documents regarding the ethical conduct of research have focused on vulnerability in terms of limitations of the capacity to provide informed consent. Other interpretations of vulnerability have emphasized unequal power relationships between politically and economically disadvantaged groups and investigators or sponsors. So many groups are now considered to be vulnerable in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Ruth R. Faden, Liza Dawson, Alison S. Bateman-House, Dawn Mueller Agnew, Hilary Bok, Dan W. Brock, Aravinda Chakravarti, Xiao-Jiang Gao, Mark Greene, John A. Hansen, Patricia A. King, Stephen J. O.’Brien & David H. Sachs (2003). Public Stem Cell Banks: Considerations of Justice in Stem Cell Research and Therapy. Hastings Center Report 33 (6):13-27.
    If stem cell-based therapies are developed, we will likely confront a difficult problem of justice: for biological reasons alone, the new therapies might benefit only a limited range of patients. In fact, they might benefit primarily white Americans, thereby exacerbating long-standing differences in health and health care.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Nancy E. Kass, Marvin R. Natowicz, Sara Chandros Hull, Ruth R. Faden, Laura Plantinga, Lawrence O. Gostin & Julia Slutsman (2003). The Use of Medical Records in Research: What Do Patients Want? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (3):429-433.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Anne Drapkin Lyerly & Ruth R. Faden (2003). HIV and Assisted Reproductive Technology: Women and Healthcare Policy. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):41-43.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. James F. Childress, Ruth R. Faden, Ruth D. Gaare, Lawrence O. Gostin, Jeffrey Kahn, Richard J. Bonnie, Nancy E. Kass, Anna C. Mastroianni, Jonathan D. Moreno & Phillip Nieburg (2002). Public Health Ethics: Mapping the Terrain. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (2):170-178.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Ruth R. Faden, Michael J. Klag, Nancy E. Kass & Sharon S. Krag (2002). On the Importance of Research Ethics and Mentoring. American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):50 – 51.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Evan R. Myers & Ruth R. Faden (2001). The Ethics of Aggregation and Hormone Replacement Therapy. Health Care Analysis 9 (2):187-211.
    The use of aggregated quality of life estimatesin the formation of public policy and practiceguidelines raises concerns about the moralrelevance of variability in values inpreferences for health care. This variabilitymay reflect unique and deeply held beliefs thatmay be lost when averaged with the preferencesof other individuals. Feminist moral theorieswhich argue for attention to context andparticularity underline the importance ofascertaining the extent to which differences inpreferences for health states revealinformation which is morally relevant toclinicians and policymakers. To facilitatethese considerations, we present (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Madison Powers & Ruth R. Faden (2000). Inequalities in Health, Inequalities in Health Care: Four Generations of Discussion About Justice and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (2):109-127.
    : The focus of questions of justice in health policy has shifted during the last 20 years, beginning with questions about rights to health care, and then, by the late 1980s, turning to issues of rationing. More recently, attention has focused on alternatives to cost-effectiveness analysis. In addition, health inequalities, and not just inequalities in access to health care, have become the subject of moral analysis. This article examines how such trends have transformed the philosophical landscape and encouraged some in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Ruth R. Faden (1997). Managed Care and Informed Consent. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):377-379.
    : Arguments for efficiency in health care delivery have been used to support some level of withholding of information about available treatment options from patients in managed care systems. To the extent that such arguments prevail, they may necessitate changes in the established understanding of and commitment to informed consent and the disclosure of information to patients.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Ruth R. Faden (1996). Chair's Perspective on the Work of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):215-221.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Ruth R. Faden (1996). Informed Consent and Clinical Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (4):356-359.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Anna C. Mastroianni, Ruth R. Faden & Daniel D. Federman (eds.) (1994). Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies. National Academy Press.
    Executive Summary There is a general perception that biomedical research has not given the same attention to the health problems of women that it has given ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jeremy Sugarman, Nancy E. Kass, Ruth R. Faden & Steven N. Goodman (1994). Catalysts for Conversations About Advance Directives: The Influence of Physician And Patient Characteristics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 22 (1):29-35.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Gail Geller, Ellen S. Tambor, Barbara A. Bernhardt, Gary A. Chase, Karen J. Hofman, Ruth R. Faden & Neil A. Holtzman (1993). Physicians'Attitudes Toward Disclosure of Genetic Information to Third Parties. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 21 (2):238-240.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Ruth R. Faden (1979). The Right to Health and the Right to Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4 (2).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation