10 found
Sort by:
  1. Ruth Glasner (forthcoming). Proclus' Commentary on Euclid's Definitions 1, 3 and 1, 6. Hermes.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ruth Glasner (forthcoming). The Problem of Beginning, Middle and End in Proclus' Commentary on Plato's Parmenides 137d. Hermes.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ruth Glasner (2009). Averroes' Physics: A Turning Point in Medieval Natural Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    Ruth Glasner presents an illuminating reappraisal of Averroes' physics.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ruth Glasner (2007). The Role of Dialogue in the Age-Old Antagonism Between Philosophy and Poetry. Iyyun 56:135.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ruth Glasner (2001). Ibn Rushd's Theory of Minima Naturalia. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 11 (1):9-26.
  6. Ruth Glasner (1997). Freudenthal, Gad, Aristotle's Theory of Material Substance Heat and Pneuma, Form and Soul (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 235 Pp. 32.50 ISBN 0 19 824093 7. [REVIEW] Early Science and Medicine 2 (1):98-100.
  7. Ruth Glasner (1997). Yeda'aya Ha-Penini's Unusual Conception of Void. Science in Context 10 (3).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ruth Glasner (1996). Brill Online Books and Journals. Early Science and Medicine 1 (2).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Ruth Glasner (1996). Gersonides's Theory of Natural Motion1. Early Science and Medicine 1 (2):151-203.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Ruth Glasner (1996). The Hebrew Version of De Celo Et Mundo Attributed to Ibn Sīnā. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 6 (01):89-.
    The Hebrew text On the Heavens and the World, ascribed to Ibn S, is an interesting and intriguing composition. It dates from the 13th century and was quite influential. It is not a translation of any text of Ibn S known to us, but is related to the (pseudo-Avicennian) Latin De celo et mundo, which appears in the 1508 Venice edition of translations of Ibn S. The Latin and Hebrew texts differ widely and the relation between them is far from (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation