27 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Ryan Wasserman [26]Ryan J. Wasserman [1]
  1. David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (2008). On Linking Dispositions and Conditionals. Mind 117 (465):59-84.
    Analyses of dispositional ascriptions in terms of conditional statements famously confront the problems of finks and masks. We argue that conditional analyses of dispositions, even those tailored to avoid.nks and masks, face five further problems. These are the problems of: (i) Achilles' heels, (ii) accidental closeness, (iii) comparatives, (iv) explaining context sensitivity, and (v) absent stimulus conditions. We conclude by offering a proposal that avoids all seven of these problems. CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   38 citations  
  2.  83
    Ryan Wasserman (2016). Theories of Persistence. Philosophical Studies 173 (1):243-250.
    The debate over persistence is often cast as a disagreement between two rival theories—the perdurantist theory that objects persist through time by having different temporal parts at different times, and the endurantist theory that objects persist through time by being wholly present at different times. This way of framing the debate over persistence involves both an important insight and an important error. Unfortunately, the error is often embraced and the insight is often ignored. This paper aims to correct both of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  29
    Ryan Wasserman (2015). Vagueness and the Laws of Metaphysics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (3).
    This is a paper about the nature of metaphysical laws and their relation to the phenomenon of vagueness. Metaphysical laws are introduced as analogous to natural laws, and metaphysical indeterminism is modeled on causal indeterminacy. This kind of indeterminacy is then put to work in developing a novel theory of vagueness and a solution to the sorites paradox.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Ryan Wasserman (2002). The Standard Objection to the Standard Account. Philosophical Studies 111 (3):197 - 216.
    What is the relation between a clay statue andthe lump of clay from which it is made? According to the defender of the standardaccount, the statue and the lump are distinct,enduring objects that share the same spatiallocation whenever they both exist. Suchobjects also seem to share the samemicrophysical structure whenever they bothexist. This leads to the standard objection tothe standard account: if the statue and thelump of clay have the same microphysicalstructure whenever they both exist, how canthey differ in their (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  5.  65
    Ryan Wasserman, Material Constitution. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  6.  94
    Ryan Wasserman (2004). The Constitution Question. Noûs 38 (4):693 - 710.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  7.  95
    David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (2007). A Gradable Approach to Dispositions. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):68–75.
    Previous theories of the relationship between dispositions and conditionals are unable to account for the fact that dispositions come in degrees. We propose a fix for this problem that has the added benefit of avoiding the classic problems of finks and masks.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  8. Ryan Wasserman (2011). Intentional Action and the Unintentional Fallacy. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):524-534.
    Much of the recent work in action theory can be organized around a set of objections facing the Simple View and other intention-based accounts of intentional action. In this paper, I review three of the most popular objections to the Simple View and argue that all three objections commit a common fallacy. I then draw some more general conclusions about the relationship between intentional action and moral responsibility.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  9. Ryan Wasserman, John Hawthorne & Mark Scala (2004). Recombination, Causal Constraints, and Humean Supervenience: An Argument for Temporal Parts? In Dean Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. OUP Oxford
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  26
    Ryan Wasserman (2015). Lewis on Backward Causation. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):141-150.
    David Lewis famously defends a counterfactual theory of causation and a non-causal, similarity-based theory of counterfactuals. Lewis also famously defends the possibility of backward causation. I argue that this combination of views is untenable—given the possibility of backward causation, one ought to reject Lewis's theories of causation and counterfactuals.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Ryan Wasserman (2006). The Problem of Change. Philosophy Compass 1 (1):48–57.
    Our world is a world of change. Children are born and grow into adults. Material possessions rust and decay with age and ultimately perish. Yet scepticism about change is as old as philosophy itself. Heraclitus, for example, argued that nothing could survive the replacement of parts, so that it is impossible to step into the same river twice. Zeno argued that motion is paradoxical, so that nothing can alter its location. Parmenides and his followers went even further, arguing that the (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  12.  43
    Ryan Wasserman (2006). The Future Similarity Objection Revisited. Synthese 150 (1):57 - 67.
    David Lewis has long defended an analysis of counterfactuals in terms of comparative similarity of possible worlds. The purpose of this paper is to reevaluate Lewis’s response to one of the oldest and most familiar objections to this proposal, the future similarity objection.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  13. Ryan Wasserman & Dennis Whitcomb (2011). The Paradox of the Question. Philosophical Studies 154 (1):149-159.
    What is the best question to ask an omniscient being? The question is intriguing; is it also paradoxical? We discuss several versions of what Ned Markosian calls the paradox of the question and suggest solutions to each of those puzzles. We then offer some practical advice about what do if you ever have the opportunity to query an omniscient being.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  91
    Ryan J. Wasserman (2005). Humean Supervenience and Personal Identity. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (221):582-593.
    Humeans hold that the nomological features of our world, including causal facts, are determined by the global distribution of fundamental properties. Since persistence presupposes causation, it follows that facts about personal identity are also globally determined. I argue that this is unacceptable for a number of reasons, and that the doctrine of Humean supervenience should therefore be rejected.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  39
    Hud Hudson & Ryan Wasserman (2010). Van Inwagen on Time Travel and Changing the Past. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: Volume 5 5:41.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  39
    Ryan Wasserman (2004). Indeterminacy, Ignorance and the Possibility of Parity. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):391–403.
  17.  48
    Ryan Wasserman (2011). Dispositions and Generics. Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):425-453.
  18. Hud Hudson & Ryan Wasserman (2010). 1. Three Potential Objections for Van Inwagen's Model. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 5:41.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  87
    Ryan Wasserman (2010). Teaching & Learning Guide For: The Problem of Change. Philosophy Compass 5 (3):283-286.
    Our world is a world of change. Children are born and grow into adults. Material possessions rust and decay with age and ultimately perish. Yet scepticism about change is as old as philosophy itself. Heraclitus, for example, argued that nothing could survive the replacement of parts, so that it is impossible to step into the same river twice. Zeno argued that motion is paradoxical, so that nothing can alter its location. Parmenides and his followers went even further, arguing that the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. David Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.) (2009). Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press.
    Metaphysics asks questions about existence: for example, do numbers really exist? Metametaphysics asksquestions about metaphysics: for example, do its questions have determinate answers? If so, are these answers deep and important, or are they merely a matter of how we use words? What is the proper methodology for their resolution? These questions have received a heightened degree of attention lately with new varieties of ontological deflationism and pluralism challenging the kind of realism that has become orthodoxy in contemporary analytic metaphysics. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21. Ryan Wasserman (2004). Framing The Debate Over Persistence. Metaphysica 5 (1):67-80.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  19
    Ryan Wasserman (2003). A Materialist Metaphysics of the Human Person by Hud Hudson. Philo 6 (2):320-330.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Ryan Wasserman, Is Causation Extensional?
    It is widely assumed that causation is an extensional relation: if c causes e and c = d, then d causes e. Similarly, if c causes e and e = f, then c causes f. Moving to the formal mode we have: The Extensionality Thesis (ET): (i) If „c causes e‟ is true and „c‟ and „d‟ co-refer, then „d causes e‟ is true; and (ii) If „c causes e‟ is true and „e‟ and „f‟ co-refer, then „c causes f‟ (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  31
    Ryan Wasserman (2006). Review of E.J. Lowe, The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (4).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Ryan Wasserman, Review Article: Hud Hudson's A Materialist Metaphysics of the Human Person.
    I am a material object. So there is a set of very small material objects (material simples, let us suppose) such that all and only the members of that set are parts of me right now. The parthood relation is a primitive, three-place relation that holds between two objects and a time. Set-membership is classical in the sense that it is never a matter of degree. I am also a human person. To say that I am a human is to (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  1
    Ryan Wasserman (2006). The Future Similarity Objection Revisited. Synthese 150 (1):57-67.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Daniel Howard-Snyder, Frances Howard-Snyder & Ryan Wasserman (2013). The Power of Logic, 5th Edition. McGraw-Hill.
    This is a basic logic text for first-time logic students. Custom-made texts from the chapters is an option as well. And there is a website to go with text too: http://www.poweroflogic.com/cgi/menu.cgi .
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography