24 found
Sort by:
  1. S. A. Grave (1989). Conscience in Newman's Thought. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. S. A. Grave (1985). Claude Buffier and Thomas Reid. Two Common-Sense Philosophers. Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (2):262-263.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. S. A. Grave (1984). A History of Philosophy in Australia. Distributed in the Usa and Canada by Technical Impex Corp..
  4. S. A. Grave (1981). Locke and Burnet. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. S. A. Grave (1976). Hume's Criticism of the Argument From Design. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 30 (1/2=115/116):64-78.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. S. A. Grave (1976). Philosophy in Australia Since 1958. Sydney University Press for the Australian Academy of the Humanities.
  7. S. A. Grave (1972). CAMPBELL, T. D. - "Adam Smith's Science of Morals". [REVIEW] Mind 81:632.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. H. Mounce, C. H. Whiteley, L. Jonathan Cohen, Don Locke, Antony Flew, Richard Robinson & S. A. Grave (1972). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 81 (324):618-639.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. S. A. Grave (1967). Common Sense. In Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York, Macmillan. 2--155.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. S. A. Grave (1967). Reid, Thomas. In Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York, Macmillan. 7--118.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. S. A. Grave (1964). The Mind and its Ideas: Some Problems in the Interpretation of Berkeley. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):199 – 210.
  12. S. A. Grave (1962). A Note on Berkeley's Conception of the Mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (4):574-576.
  13. S. A. Grave (1962). PASSMORE, J. A.: "Philosophical Reasoning". Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40:366.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. S. A. Grave (1960). Moral Distinctions in a State of Nature. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):255 – 259.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. S. A. Grave (1960/1973). The Scottish Philosophy of Common Sense. Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press.
  16. S. A. Grave (1959). Too Good a Reason to Be a Reason. Analysis 20 (2):37 - 41.
    The article is a criticism of professor nowell-Smith's contention that 'i ought' is a way of saying 'i shall'. In the author's own words: "'i ought' would be too good a reason for a decision if it entailed 'i shall'. Since it is possible to choose to do what one believes to be wrong, 'i ought' does not entail 'i shall'." (staff).
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. S. A. Grave (1958). Are the Analyses of Moral Concepts Morally Neutral? Journal of Philosophy 55 (11):455-460.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. S. A. Grave (1956). On Evil and Omnipotence. Mind 65 (258):259-262.
  19. S. A. Grave & R. L. Franklin (1955). The Perfect Good: Replies to Mr. Martin. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):111 – 118.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. S. A. Grave (1952). The Foundation of Butler's Ethics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):73 – 89.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. S. A. Grave (1952). The Ontological Argument of St. Anselm: PHILOSOPHY. Philosophy 27 (100):30-38.
    The first aim of this paper is to try and determine what St. Anselm meant in his original argument in the Proslogion . This needs to be done because not only are the writers who expound his demonstration divided in their interpretations of it, and these interpretations quite different, but, very strangely, one does not find that they mention that there is any ambiguity and that other writers construe Anselm's words differently from themselves. Since there are in fact two arguments (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. S. A. Grave (1952). The Ontological Argument of St. Anselm. Philosophy 27 (100):30 - 38.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. S. A. Grave (1950). Aristotelian Philosophy and Functional Design. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):29 – 42.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. S. A. Grave (1939). A Study of Speculative Theism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):108 – 143.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation