96 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Stephen Barker [46]Stephen F. Barker [12]Stephen J. Barker [11]S. F. Barker [9]
Stephen Francis Barker [6]S. Barker [4]S. J. Barker [2]Sebastian Barker [2]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Stephen Barker (Nottingham University)
Profile: Samuel Felix Maclaren Barker (Durham University)
Profile: Simon Barker
Profile: Sam Barker
  1. Stephen Barker, Expressivism About Truth-Making.
    My goal is to illuminate truth-making by way of illuminating the relation of making. My strategy is not to ask what making is, in the hope of a metaphysical theory about is nature. It's rather to look first to the language of making. The metaphor behind making refers to agency. It would be absurd to suggest that claims about making are claims about agency. It is not absurd, however, to propose that the concept of making somehow emerges from some feature (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Stephen J. Barker, Global Expressivism.
    There is a wide-spread belief amongst theorists of mind and language. This is that in order to understand the relation between language, thought, and reality we need a theory of meaning and content, that is, a normative, formal science of meaning, which is an extension and theoretical deepening of folk ideas about meaning. This book argues that this is false, offering an alternative idea: The form of a theory that illuminates the relation of language, thought, and reality is a theory (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Sebastian Barker (forthcoming). Nine Stanzas From the Dream of Intelligence. Journal of Nietzsche Studies.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Sebastian Barker (forthcoming). The Dream of Intelligence. Journal of Nietzsche Studies.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stephen Barker (2014). Semantic Paradox and Alethic Undecidability. Analysis 74 (2):201-209.
    I use the principle of truth-maker maximalism to provide a new solution to the semantic paradoxes. According to the solution, AUS, its undecidable whether paradoxical sentences are grounded or ungrounded. From this it follows that their alethic status is undecidable. We cannot assert, in principle, whether paradoxical sentences are true, false, either true or false, neither true nor false, both true and false, and so on. AUS involves no ad hoc modification of logic, denial of the T-schema's validity, or obvious (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Stephen Barker & Mark Jago (2014). Monism and Material Constitution. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (1).
    Are the sculpture and the mass of gold which permanently makes it up one object or two? In this article, we argue that the monist, who answers ‘one object’, cannot accommodate the asymmetry of material constitution. To say ‘the mass of gold materially constitutes the sculpture, whereas the sculpture does not materially constitute the mass of gold’, the monist must treat ‘materially constitutes’ as an Abelardian predicate, whose denotation is sensitive to the linguistic context in which it appears. We motivate (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Stephen Barker (2013). Hybrid Theories of Moral Statements. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Stephen Barker (2013). The Emperor's New Metaphysics of Powers. Mind (487):fzt082.
    This paper argues that the new metaphysics of powers, also known as dispositional essentialism or causal structuralism, is an illusory metaphysics. I argue for this in the following way. I begin by distinguishing three fundamental ways of seeing how facts of physical modality — facts about physical necessitation and possibility, causation, disposition, and chance — are grounded in the world. The first way, call it the first degree, is that the actual world or all worlds, in their entirety, are the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Sue Barker (2013). The Road to Eternal Life: Reflections on the Prologue of Benedict's Rule [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 90 (1):122.
    Barker, Sue Review(s) of: The road to eternal life: Reflections on the prologue of Benedict's rule, by Michael Casey OCSO, (Mulgrave VIC: John Garratt Publishing, 2011), pp.182, $29.95.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. S. Barker & B. Smart (2012). The Ultimate Argument Against Dispositional Monist Accounts of Laws. Analysis 72 (4):714-722.
    Alexander Bird argues that David Armstrong’s necessitarian conception of physical modality and laws of nature generates a vicious regress with respect to necessitation. We show that precisely the same regress afflicts Bird’s dispositional-monist theory, and indeed, related views, such as that of Mumford and Anjum. We argue that dispositional monism is basically Armstrongian necessitarianism modified to allow for a thesis about property identity.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Stephen Barker (2012). Fxpressivism About Making and Truth-Making. In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge University Press. 272.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Stephen Barker (2012). Post-Scriptum: Pharmacodemocracy. Derrida Today 5 (1):1-20.
    The essay continues the discussion on democracy begun in Derrida Today 4:2, interrogating the associations between the nature of the pharmakon and democracy ‘itself’, seen as ‘the sovereignty of the people’. Starting with Derrida's notion of writing (and grammatology in general) as what he calls the ‘errant democrat’, shared by – and indeed defining – all, and at the same time prior to the demos, Bernard Stiegler makes the further claim that this foundation of democracy, the pharmakon, is not simply (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Stephen Barker (2012). Truth-Making and the Alethic Undecidability of the Liar. Discusiones Filosóficas 13 (21):13 - 31.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Mark Jago & Stephen Barker (2012). Being Positive About Negative Facts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):117-138.
    Negative facts get a bad press. One reason for this is that it is not clear what negative facts are. We provide a theory of negative facts on which they are no stranger than positive atomic facts. We show that none of the usual arguments hold water against this account. Negative facts exist in the usual sense of existence and conform to an acceptable Eleatic principle. Furthermore, there are good reasons to want them around, including their roles in causation, chance-making (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Benjamin Smart & Stephen Barker (2012). The Ultimate Argument Against Dispositional Monist Accounts of Laws. Analysis 72 (4):714-723.
    Alexander Bird argues that David Armstrong’s necessitarian conception of physical modality and laws of nature generates a vicious regress with respect to necessitation. We show that precisely the same regress afflicts Bird’s dispositional-monist theory, and indeed, related views, such as that of Mumford and Anjum. We argue that dispositional monism is basically Armstrongian necessitarianism modified to allow for a thesis about property identity.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Stephen Barker (2011). Can Counterfactuals Really Be About Possible Worlds? Noûs 45 (3):557-576.
    The standard view about counterfactuals is that a counterfactual (A > C) is true if and only if the A-worlds most similar to the actual world @ are C-worlds. I argue that the worlds conception of counterfactuals is wrong. I assume that counterfactuals have non-trivial truth-values under physical determinism. I show that the possible-worlds approach cannot explain many embeddings of the form (P > (Q > R)), which intuitively are perfectly assertable, and which must be true if the contingent falsity (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Stephen Barker (2011). Simon Morgan Wortham, The Derrida Dictionary (Continuum Books, 2010), 264 Pp. ISSN 978-1-8470-6526-1. [REVIEW] Derrida Today 4 (1):132-137.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Stephen Barker (2011). Truth-Bearers and the Unsaid. In Ken Turner (ed.), Making Semantics Pragmatic. CUP.
    I argue that conventional implicatures embed in logical compounds, and are non-truth-conditional contributors to sentence meaning. This, I argue has significant implications for how we understand truth, truth-conditional content, and truth-bearers.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Stephen J. Barker (2010). Cognitive Expressivism, Faultless Disagreement, and Absolute but Non-Objective Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (2pt2):183-199.
    I offer a new theory of faultless disagreement, according to which truth is absolute (non-relative) but can still be non-objective. What's relative is truth-aptness: a sentence like ‘Vegemite is tasty’ (V) can be truth-accessible and bivalent in one context but not in another. Within a context in which V fails to be bivalent, we can affirm that there is no issue of truth or falsity about V, still disputants, affirming and denying V, were not at fault, since, in their context (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Stephen Barker (2009). Dispositional Monism, Relational Constitution and Quiddities. Analysis 69 (2):242-250.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Stephen Barker (2009). Indefinite Descriptions as Referring Terms. Organon F 16 (4):569-586.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Stephen Barker (2009). Leaving Things to Take Their Chances : Cause and Disposition Grounded in Chance. In Toby Handfield (ed.), Dispositions and Causes. Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press ;.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Stephen Barker (2009). Threshold (Pro-)Positions: Touch, Techné, Technics. Derrida Today 2 (1):44-65.
    Touching on Nancy and Derrida offers a glimpse not only into the thesis both of Jean-Luc Nancy's critique of touch and of Derrida's Le Toucher, but also into the threshold of a technology of (the) sense to come. This glimpse is an interrogation, and one that is both historic and historical, in the sense that Derrida, in addressing Jean-Luc Nancy's work, has presented us with an encyclopedic history of touch in the philosophic tradition from Aristotle to Nancy, one in which (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Stephen F. Barker (2009). Improving Your Thinking. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Steve Barker, Guido Boella, Dov M. Gabbay & Valerio Genovese (2009). A Meta-Model of Access Control in a Fibred Security Language. Studia Logica 92 (3):437 - 477.
    The issue of representing access control requirements continues to demand significant attention. The focus of researchers has traditionally been on developing particular access control models and policy specification languages for particular applications. However, this approach has resulted in an unnecessary surfeit of models and languages. In contrast, we describe a general access control model and a logic-based specification language from which both existing and novel access control models may be derived as particular cases and from which several approaches can be (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Stephen Barker (2008). Strata/Sedimenta/Lamina: In Ruin(S). Derrida Today 5 (1):42-58.
    Ruins, their evocations and enigmas, have been a source of fascination since the advent of civilization. Both coordinating and distressing the relations of space and time, ruins are unparalleled catalysts of cultural analysis, as both history and adumbration. Ruins, and the concept of ruin on which they ‘rest’ and through which they decay, can be regarded in space, as strata, in time, as sedimenta, and in dynamic terms, as lamina. This essay works down through each focusing on the forceof ruin (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Stephen Barker (2008). Zarathustra's Shadow and Virtual Nihilism. The European Legacy 2 (4):658-663.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Stephen Barker (2007). Review of Mark Sainsbury, Reference Without Referents. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Stephen J. Barker (2007). Semantics Without the Distinction Between Sense and Force. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Stephen Barker (2006). Truth and the Expressing in Expressivism. In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press. 299.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Stephen Barker (2006). Wettstein's Prism. Philosophical Books 47 (1):15-24.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Stephen Francis Barker (2006). Lewis on Implication. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):10-16.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John Corcoran, Stephen F. Barker, Eric Dayton, John Greco, Naomi Zack, Richard S. Robin, Joel Isaac & Murray G. Murphey (2006). A Symposium on Murray G. Murphey, CI Lewis: The Last Great Pragmatist. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):1-77.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Stephen Barker & Phil Dowe (2005). Endurance is Paradoxical. Analysis 65 (285):69-74.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Stephen Barker (2004). Analysing Chancy Causation Without Appeal to Chance-Raising. In Phil Dowe & Paul Noordhof (eds.), Cause and Chance: Causation in an Indeterministic World. Routledge.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Stephen J. Barker (2004). Renewing Meaning: A Speech-Act Theoretic Approach. Clarendon Press.
    Stephen Barker presents his first, ambitious book in the philosophy of language, setting out a radical alternative to standard theories of meaning.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. S. Barker (2003). A Dilemma for the Counterfactual Analysis of Causation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):62 – 77.
    If we seek to analyse causation in terms of counterfactual conditionals then we must assume that there is a class of counterfactuals whose members (i) are all and only those we need to support our judgements of causation, (ii) have truth-conditions specifiable without any irreducible appeal to causation. I argue that (i) and (ii) are unlikely to be met by any counterfactual analysis of causation. I demonstrate this by isolating a class of counterfactuals called non-projective counterfactuals, or NP-counterfactuals, and indicate (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Stephen Barker (2003). Counterfactual Analyses of Causation: The Problem of Effects and Epiphenomena Revisited. Noûs 37 (1):133–150.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Stephen Barker (2003). Comments: The Experiential Thesis. Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (Supplement):57-61.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Stephen Barker (2003). Truth and Conventional Implicature. Mind 112 (445):1-34.
    Are all instances of the T-schema assertable? I argue that they are not. The reason is the presence of conventional implicature in a language. Conventional implicature is meant to be a component of the rule-based content that a sentence can have, but it makes no contribution to the sentence's truth-conditions. One might think that a conventional implicature is like a force operator. But it is not, since it can enter into the scope of logical operators. It follows that the semantic (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Stephen Barker (2003). The Experiential Thesis: Audi on Intrinsic Value. Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (S1):57-61.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Stephen Barker (2003). Tums of Phrase: A Geometry of Shapirean Aesthetics. New Nietzsche Studies 5 (3/4/1/2):173-180.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Stephen Barker (2003). Tums of Phrase. New Nietzsche Studies 5 (3/4/1/2):173-180.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Stephen Barker & Phil Dowe (2003). Paradoxes of Multi-Location. Analysis 63 (2):106–114.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Stephen Barker (2002). Review: Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):633-639.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Stephen J. Barker (2002). Troubles with Horgan and Timmons' Nondescriptivist Cognitivism. Grazer Philosophische Studien 63 (1):235-255.
    Emotivist, or non-descriptivist metaethical theories hold that value-statements do not function by describing special value-facts, but are the mere expressions of naturalistically describable motivational states of (valuing) agents. Non-descriptivism has typically been combined with the claim that value-statements are non-cognitive: they are not the manifestations of genuine belief states. However, all the linguistic, logical and phenomenological evidence indicates that value-statements are cognitive. Non-descriptivism then has a problem. Horgan and Timmons propose to solve it by boldly combining a non-descriptivist thesis about (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Stephen Barker (2001). The Mirror and the Dagger. In Steve Martinot (ed.), Maps and Mirrors: Topologies of Art and Politics. Northwestern University Press. 83.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Simon Barker (2000). The End of Argument: Knowledge and the Internet. Philosophy and Rhetoric 33 (2):154-181.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Stephen J. Barker (2000). Is Value Content a Component of Conventional Implicature? Analysis 60 (267):268–279.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. S. Barker (1999). Counterfactuals, Probabilistic Counterfactuals and Causation. Mind 108 (431):427-469.
    It seems to be generally accepted that (a) counterfactual conditionals are to be analysed in terms of possible worlds and inter-world relations of similarity and (b) causation is conceptually prior to counterfactuals. I argue here that both (a) and (b) are false. The argument against (a) is not a general metaphysical or epistemological one but simply that, structurally speaking, possible worlds theories are wrong: this is revealed when we try to extend them to cover the case of probabilistic counterfactuals. Indeed (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 96