5 found
Stephan Boehm [4]Stephan G. Boehm [1]S. Boehm [1]S. G. Boehm [1]
  1.  19
    K. A. Paller, J. L. Voss & S. G. Boehm (2007). Validating Neural Correlates of Familiarity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (6):243-250.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  2.  15
    S. Boehm, E. KlostErmann, W. Sommer & K. Paller (2006). Dissociating Perceptual and Representation-Based Contributions to Priming of Face Recognition☆. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (1):163-174.
    Repetition priming of object identification refers to the phenomenon whereby experience with an object induces systematic changes in subsequent processing of that same object. This data-driven form of priming is distinct from conceptually-driven priming. To date, considerable controversy exists about whether data-driven priming reflects facilitation in perceptual processing or mediation by preexisting object representations. The present study concerned priming of recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces and how this priming is influenced by face inversion, which interferes with perceptual face processing. Perceptual (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  3.  10
    Stephan Boehm (2002). The Ramifications of John Searle's Social Philosophy in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 9 (1):1-10.
    John Searle is well known for his contributions to the philosophy of language and to the philosophy of mind. In recent years he has extended his investigation to focus on the nature of social reality. In particular, he is intrigued by the creation of institutional facts, such as money, marriages and football matches. He postulates three primitive notions - 'collective intentionality', 'the assignment of function' and 'constitutive rules' - that are needed for the construction of institutional reality. The papers and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  4.  4
    Stephan Boehm & Karl Farmer (1993). Why the Acrimony? Reply to Davidson. Critical Review 7 (2-3):407-421.
    Our response to Davidson is two?pronged. First, we dispute the basis for his dismissal of Austrian economics as presented by O'Driscoll and Rizzo. In particular, we reject his claim, dictated entirely by his Post Keynesian perspective, concerning an ?identical axiomatic foundation? of Austrian and neoclassical economics. Second, we seek to show that Davidson's criticism of neoclassicism (and by implication of Austrianism) is based on a superficial, incorrect, and outmoded reading of neoclassical economics.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  5. Jason Arndt, Bruno G. Bara, Tim Bayne, Cristina Becchio, Cordula Becker, Derek Besner, Mark Blagrove, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, Stephan G. Boehm & Francesca Marina Bosco (2006). Adenzato, Mauro, 64 Allilaire, Jean-François, 258 Alonso, Diego, 386 Andrade, Jackie, 1, 28. Consciousness and Cognition 15:767-768.
    No categories
    Export citation  
    My bibliography