19 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Sander Gliboff [18]S. Gliboff [1]
  1. S. Gliboff (2000). Paley's Design Argument as an Inference to the Best Explanation, or, Dawkins' Dilemma. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31 (4):579-597.
  2.  14
    Sander Gliboff (1999). Gregor Mendel and the Laws of Evolution. History of Science 37 (2):217-235.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  3.  13
    Sander Gliboff (1998). Evolution, Revolution, and Reform in Vienna: Franz Unger's Ideas on Descent and Their Post-1848 Reception. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 31 (2):179 - 209.
  4.  5
    Sander Gliboff (2007). H. G. Bronn and the History of Nature. Journal of the History of Biology 40 (2):259 - 294.
    The German paleontologist H. G. Bronn is best remembered for his 1860 translation and critique of Darwin's Origin of Species, and for supposedly twisting Darwinian evolution into conformity with German idealistic morphology. This analysis of Bronn's writings shows, however, that far from being mired in an outmoded idealism that confined organic change to predetermined developmental pathways, Bronn had worked throughout the 1840s and 1850s on a new, historical approach to life. He had been moving from the study of plant and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5.  15
    Sander Gliboff (2006). The Case of Paul Kammerer: Evolution and Experimentation in the Early 20th Century. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 39 (3):525 - 563.
    To some, a misguided Lamarckian and a fraud, to others a martyr in the fight against Darwinism, the Viennese zoologist Paul Kammerer (1880-1926) remains one of the most controversial scientists of the early 20th century. Here his work is reconsidered in light of turn-of-the-century problems in evolutionary theory and experimental methodology, as seen from Kammerer's perspective in Vienna. Kammerer emerges not as an opponent of Darwinism, but as one would-be modernizer of the 19th-century theory, which had included a role for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  8
    Sander Gliboff (2004). Book Review: Thomas Junker,Die Zweite Darwinsche Revolution. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 37 (3):601-602.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  2
    Sander Gliboff (2000). Paley's Design Argument as an Inference to the Best Explanation, or, Dawkins' Dilemma. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (4):579-597.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  1
    Sander Gliboff (2011). Michal Simunek, Uwe Hoßfeld, Olaf Breidbach and Miklós Müller , Mendelism in Bohemia and Moravia, 1900–1930. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2010. Pp. 276. ISBN 978-3-515-09602-7. €48.00. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 44 (4):611-612.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  1
    Sander Gliboff (2012). The Mendelian Dioskuri: Correspondence of Armin with Erich von Tschermak-Seysenegg, 1898–1951. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 45 (2):303-305.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  4
    Sander Gliboff (2005). The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation.. Philosophy of Science 72 (4):654-656.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  1
    Sander Gliboff (2014). Science and Nationality in the Habsburg Empire. Metascience 23 (2):369-371.
    Even though science strives to transcend national differences, scientists in the multi-national, multi-lingual, multi-ethnic Habsburg Empire could hardly avoid being caught up in a web of competing ethnic, national, and imperial interests. Where should their identities and loyalties lie and where should they seek support for their work? At the level of the empire as a whole? One of its component kingdoms or principalities? Other institutions? What audience should they write for, and in what language? Or, from the point of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Sander Gliboff (2015). Breeding Better Peas, Pumpkins, and Peasants: The Practical Mendelism of Erich Tschermak. In Sharon Kingsland & Denise Phillips (eds.), New Perspectives on the History of Life Sciences and Agriculture. Springer International Publishing
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Sander Gliboff (2010). Die Entstehung der Biologischen Evolutionstheorie. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 101:239-240.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Sander Gliboff (2011). Differenz Und Vererbung: Geschlechterordnungen in der Genetik Und Hormonforschung 1890–1950. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 102:577-578.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Sander Gliboff (2011). Helga Satzinger.Differenz und Vererbung: Geschlechterordnungen in der Genetik und Hormonforschung 1890–1950. 484 pp., figs., bibl., index. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 2009. €49.90. [REVIEW] Isis 102 (3):577-578.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Sander Gliboff (2012). Monism and Morphology at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. In Todd H. Weir (ed.), Monism: Science, Philosophy, Religion, and the History of a Worldview. Palgrave Macmillan
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Sander Gliboff (2011). Mendelism in Bohemia and Moravia, 1900–1930. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 44 (4):611-612.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Sander Gliboff (2012). Michal Simunek, Uwe Hoßfeld, Florian Thümmler and Olaf Breidbach , The Mendelian Dioskuri: Correspondence of Armin with Erich von Tschermak-Seysenegg, 1898–1951. Studies in the History of Sciences and Humanities 27. Prague: Institute of Contemporary History of the Academy of Sciences, Prague, and Department of Genetics/‘Mendelianum’ of the Moravian Museum, Brno, 2011. Pp. 259. ISBN 978-80-87378-67-0. Price Unknown .Michal Simunek, Uwe Hoßfeld, Florian Thümmler, and Jiří Sekerák , The Letters on G.J. Mendel: Correspondence of William Bateson, Hugo Iltis, and Erich von Tschermak-Seysenegg with Alois and Ferdinand Schindler, 1902–1935. Studies in the History of Sciences and Humanities 28. Prague: Institute of Contemporary History of the Academy of Sciences, Prague, and Department of Genetics/‘Mendelianum’ of the Moravian Museum, Brno, 2011. Pp. 131. ISBN 978-80-87378-73-1. Price Unknown. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 45 (2):303-305.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Sander Gliboff (2010). Wolfgang Lefèvre.Die Entstehung der biologischen Evolutionstheorie. Revised edition. 339 pp., illus., bibl., index. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2009. €13. [REVIEW] Isis 101 (1):239-240.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography