Search results for 'S. H. Vollmer' (try it on Scholar)

5 found
Sort by:
  1. S. H. Vollmer (2003). The Philosophy of Chemistry Reformulating Itself: Nalni Bhushan and Stuart Rosenfeld's of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. Philosophy of Science 70 (2):383-390.score: 1410.0
    Philosophers of chemistry, following the lead of physicists, have been slow to realize that molecular descriptions issuing from quantum mechanics in the absence of chemical theory are fatally flawed. In the wake of this realization, new topics have begun to unfoldincluding new metaphysical issues, new concerns about the philosophy of chemistry's place in the philosophy of science, and new accounts of how properties are observed, inferred, and presented. A recent collection of essays, Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. S. H. Vollmer & N. S. Hall, Guide and Case Studies.score: 870.0
    The goal of this small book and accompanying DVD is to help you to have a better experience in your laboratory by getting you to step back and take a global look at what is involved in making progress in the laboratory.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. M. Galota, H. Vollmer & S. Kosub (2003). Generic Separations and Leaf Languages. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (4):353.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. H. W. Garrod (1911). Vollmer's Appendix Vergiliana. The Classical Review 25 (06):180-182.score: 189.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Gerd H. Hövelmann (1984). Sprachkritische Bemerkungen Zur Evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 15 (1):92-121.score: 45.0
    Summary In the first part of this contribution, the three probably most influential conceptions of evolutionary epistemology are surveyed, as they were put forward by Konrad Lorenz, Gerhard Vollmer, and Rupert Riedl, respectively. It is demonstrated that, as far as the essentials are concerned, these conceptions largely correspond with each other as well as with a further conception advanced by Karl Popper from the point of view of Critical Rationalism. It can be clearly shown, moreover, that fundamentals of the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation