90 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Sheldon Richmond [36]S. Richmond [17]Sarah Richmond [14]Samuel A. Richmond [12]
Stuart Richmond [9]Sheldon Saul Richmond [2]Sarah Diane Richmond [1]S. D. Richmond [1]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
  1.  37
    Samuel A. Richmond (1975). Value Predications: Simple or Complex? Analysis 35 (5):171 - 174.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Indian Logic, A. Reader & Surrey Richmond (2002). The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China. By Michael Puett. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001. Pp. Viii+ 299. Hardcover $55.00. Ancestors in Post-Contact Religion: Roots, Ruptures, and Modernity's Memory. Edited by Steven J. Friesen. Cambridge: Harvard University Press for the Center. [REVIEW] Philosophy East and West 52 (4):501-503.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  79
    Sheldon Richmond (forthcoming). Book Review: Chasing Reality: Strife Over Realism, by Mario Bunge. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  26
    Sheldon Richmond (2014). Book Review: Why Things Matter to People: Science, Values and Ethical Life. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (6):837-839.
  5.  4
    Sheldon Richmond (2015). Jeffrey A. Barrett and Peter Byrne, Eds., The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works 1955-1980. Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 35 (3):127-129.
    Spinoza’s metaphysics has returned in the work of Hugh Everett as physics— as a complete and consistent interpretation of Quantum Mechanics that resolves the traditional puzzles of the standard interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  27
    Jonathan Wolff, Sarah Edwards, Sarah Richmond, O. R. R. Shepley & Geraint Rees (2012). Evaluating Interventions in Health: A Reconciliatory Approach. Bioethics 26 (9):455-463.
    Health-related Quality of Life measures have recently been attacked from two directions, both of which criticize the preference-based method of evaluating health states they typically incorporate. One attack, based on work by Daniel Kahneman and others, argues that ‘experience’ is a better basis for evaluation. The other, inspired by Amartya Sen, argues that ‘capability’ should be the guiding concept. In addition, opinion differs as to whether health evaluation measures are best derived from consultations with the general public, with patients, or (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  4
    Jonathan Wolff, Sarah Edwards, Sarah Richmond, Shepley Orr & Geraint Rees (2012). Evaluating Interventions in Health: A Reconciliatory Approach. Bioethics 26 (9):455-463.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  2
    Sheldon Richmond (forthcoming). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. By Nick Bostrom. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014, Pp. Xvi+328. Hardcover: $29.95/ £18.99. ISBN: 9780199678112. [REVIEW] Philosophy:1-6.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Sarah Richmond (2010). Magic in Sartre's Early Philosophy. In Jonathan Webber (ed.), Reading Sartre: On Phenomenology and Existentialism. Routledge
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Jean Paul Sartre, Andrew Brown & Sarah Richmond (2004). The Transcendence of the Ego a Sketch for a Phenomenological Description.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  94
    Sarah Richmond (2007). Sartre and Bergson: A Disagreement About Nothingness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):77 – 95.
    Henri Bergson's philosophy, which Sartre studied as a student, had a profound but largely neglected influence on his thinking. In this paper I focus on the new light that recognition of this influence throws on Sartre's central argument about the relationship between negation and nothingness in his Being and Nothingness. Sartre's argument is in part a response to Bergson's dismissive, eliminativist account of nothingness in Creative Evolution (1907): the objections to the concept of nothingness with which Sartre engages are precisely (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  4
    Sheldon Richmond (2015). Ellen Rose , On Reflection: An Essay on Technology, Education, and the Status of Thought in the Twenty-First Century . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 35 (1):38-40.
  13.  1
    Sheldon Richmond (2015). Book Review: Understanding the Tacit by Stephen P. Turner. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (4-5):528-533.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  12
    Sarah Richmond (2004). Being in Others: Empathy From a Psychoanalytical Perspective. European Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):244–264.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  1
    Sheldon Richmond (2015). Book Review: Understanding the Tacit by Stephen P. Turner. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (4-5):528-533.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  28
    Samuel A. Richmond (1996). A Simplification of the Theory of Simplicity. Synthese 107 (3):373 - 393.
    Nelson Goodman has constructed two theories of simplicity: one of predicates; one of hypotheses. I offer a simpler theory by generalization and abstraction from his. Generalization comes by dropping special conditions Goodman imposes on which unexcluded extensions count as complicating and which excluded extensions count as simplifying. Abstraction is achieved by counting only nonisomorphic models and subinterpretations. The new theory takes into account all the hypotheses of a theory in assessing its complexity, whether they were projected prior to, or result (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  6
    S. Richmond (2014). Inconsistency in Sartre's Analysis of Emotion. Analysis 74 (4):612-615.
    In this article, I reply to the charge, made in Analysis by Anthony Hatzimoysis, that my criticism of Sartre's Sketch for a Theory of the Emotions is unwarranted. I argued that Sartre offers two lines of reasoning about emotional experience that are in clear conflict with each other. Hatzimoysis counters that we can and should read Sartre's text in a way that avoids attributing inconsistency to Sartre. In response, I argue that Hatzimoysis' suggestion about how one might read the text (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  21
    Sarah Richmond (1996). Derrida and Analytical Philosophy: Speech Acts and Their Force. European Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):38-62.
  19.  2
    Samuel A. Richmond (1971). Sommers on Predicability. Journal of Philosophy 68 (5):137-142.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  29
    Sarah Richmond (2001). Psychoanalysis and Feminism: Anorexia, the Social World, and the Internal World. Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology 8 (1):1-12.
  21.  3
    Sheldon Richmond (2014). Greg Frost-Arnold , Carnap, Tarski, Quine at Harvard: Conversations on Logic, Mathematics, and Science . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 34 (5):222-224.
  22.  5
    Stuart Richmond (forthcoming). Liberalism, Multiculturalism, and Art Education. Journal of Aesthetic Education.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  26
    Sarah Richmond (2011). Sartre and the Doctors. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (4):517-538.
    This paper considers how the experience of illness fits within Sartre?s account of embodiment in Being and Nothingness. Sartre makes some remarks about illness, but does not develop a full account. I show that the anti?naturalistic ontological framework in which Sartre?s discussion of the body is placed, which opposes my ?being?for?Others? to my ?being?for?myself?, imposes a revisionary account of illness, and how Sartre?s model of interpersonal relations affects his view of doctors, and their role in the illness experience. I note (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  13
    Joseph P. DeMarco & Samuel A. Richmond (1977). A Note on the Priority of Liberty. Ethics 87 (3):272-275.
  25.  5
    Samuel A. Richmond (1987). Justice. Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):31-38.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  4
    S. Richmond (1985). Book Reviews : Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Volume 2: The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. By Roy Bhaskar. Humanities Press: New Jersey 1979. Pp. IX + 228. $28.75. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 (2):235-236.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  2
    Sheldon Richmond (1987). William Berkson and John Wettersten, Learning From Error: Karl Popper's Psychology of Learning Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 7 (1):1-3.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  3
    Samuel A. Richmond (1975). A Possible Empirical Violation of Sommers' Rule for Enforcing Ambiguity. Philosophical Studies 28 (5):363 - 366.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  1
    Sheldon Richmond (2015). Book Review: Natural Categories and Human Kinds: Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences by Muhammad Ali Khalidi. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (2):283-288.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  6
    Sheldon Richmond (2013). Vasso Kindi and Arabatzis, Eds. , Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 33 (3):203–207.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  2
    S. Richmond (2014). Book Review: Towards Discursive Education, Philosophy, Technology, and Modern Education. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (5):702-704.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  10
    Samuel A. Richmond (1994). Newton and Hume on Causation: Alternative Strategies of Simplification. History of Philosophy Quarterly 11 (1):37 - 52.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  3
    Sheldon Richmond (1980). A Discussion of Some Theories of Pictorial Representation. Dialectica 34 (3):229-240.
    SummaryThe main question of this paper is — how do representational pictures convey information? I argue: 1) This question is approached from three opposing metaphysical frameworks. a) Monism answers this question by treating representational pictures as a species of cognitive symbolism. b) Polarism answers this question by sharply distinguishing between natural symbolism and languages; and, between symbolism and reality — representational pictures are natural symbols, mimics of reality. c) Pluralism treats pictures as occupying a mid‐point between the scales of reality (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  3
    Sheldon Richmond (2012). Karl Popper (Jeremy Shearmur and Piers Norris Turner, Eds.), After the Open Society: Selected Social and Political Writings. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 32 (4):316-318.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  1
    Sheldon Richmond (2014). Is “Aesthetics” Art Studies? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (2):223-232.
    I provide a context for Agassi’s and Jarvie’s discussion of Aesthetics to show how their theory involves a turn to Art Studies. This turn provides a new and interesting focus in Aesthetics that revitalizes traditional aesthetics as the search for values in art. This turn also breaks the illusion of depth and progress in contemporary aesthetics by raising so far unasked critical questions in Aesthetics concerning the social demands placed on artists and the institutions of art.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  16
    Stuart Richmond (2009). Art's Educational Value. Journal of Aesthetic Education 43 (1):pp. 92-105.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  8
    Sheldon Richmond (1995). Meta-Aesthetics and Meta-Methodology. Tradition and Discovery 22 (2):36-37.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  7
    Sheldon Richmond (2003). Truth. Tradition and Discovery 30 (2):41-43.
  39.  2
    Sheldon Richmond (2013). Hilary Putnam , Philosophy in An Age of Science: Physics, Mathematics, and Skepticism . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 33 (1):67-69.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  12
    Samuel A. Richmond (1976). On Replacing the Notion of Intrinsic Value. Journal of Value Inquiry 10 (3):205-208.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  2
    Sarah Richmond (2012). Brain Imaging and the Transparency Scenario. In Sarah Richmond, Geraint Rees & Sarah J. L. Edwards (eds.), I Know What You're Thinking: Brain Imaging and Mental Privacy. Oxford University Press 185.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  2
    Stuart Richmond (2006). Bill Brandt: A Life (Review). Journal of Aesthetic Education 40 (2):118-124.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  2
    S. Richmond, Review of 'The Sense of Reality' by Isaiah Berlin. [REVIEW]
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  2
    S. Richmond (1982). A Rational Animal and Other Philosophical Essays on the Nature of Man. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12 (4):448-452.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  1
    S. Richmond (2005). Kristjan Kristjansson, Justifying Emotions: Pride and Jealousy. European Journal of Philosophy 13 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  9
    Stuart Richmond (2004). Remembering Beauty: Reflections of Kant and Cartier-Bresson for Aspiring Photographers. Journal of Aesthetic Education 38 (1):78-88.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  2
    Sheldon Richmond (2012). Karl Popper, The Two Fundamental Problems of the Theory of Knowledge. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 32 (5):418-420.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  8
    S. Richmond (2008). Book Review: Bunge, Mario. 2006. Chasing Reality: Strife Over Realism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):545-551.
  49.  6
    Sheldon Richmond (1979). When to Begin Writing. Teaching Philosophy 3 (2):181-183.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  6
    Sheldon Richmond (1974). Review Symposium : Man= the Rational Hunter: Some Comments on the Book by Tiger and Fox, the Imperial Animal. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 4 (2):279-291.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 90