7 found
Order:
  1.  11
    Sabine Ammon (2007). Realismus oder Idealismus? – Irrealismus! Fichte-Studien 31:81-92.
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  6
    Sabine Ammon (2012). Comprender el conocimiento. La contribución de Goodman al desarrollo de un concepto plural y procesal del conocimiento. Enrahonar 49:11-28.
    La definición estándar del conocimiento intenta concebir el conocimiento proposicional como una creencia verdadera y justificada, y, con su modo de proceder, genera una serie de graves problemas. En respuesta a esto, este ensayo investiga un modelo interpretativo prometedor y alternativo del conocimiento como estructura o sistema que se acopla a las reflexiones de Nelson Goodman. A partir de una amplia base constituida por la teoría de los símbolos, es posible desarrollar un concepto de conocimiento plural y procesal que se (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  13
    Sabine Ammon (2007). Nelson Goodman in der Diskussion. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 55 (1):158-161.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Sabine Ammon (2012). ANT im Architekturburo Eine philosophische Metaanalyse. Zeitschrift für Ästhetik Und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 57 (1):127-149.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Sabine Ammon (2009). Language of Architecture. In G. Ernst, J. Steinbrenner & O. Scholz (eds.), From Logic to Art: Themes From Nelson Goodman. Ontos 7--321.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  3
    Stephen R. Grimm, Christoph Baumberger & Sabine Ammon (eds.) (2016). Explaining Understanding: New Perspectives From Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
    What does it mean to understand something? What types of understanding can be distinguished? Is understanding always provided by explanations? And how is it related to knowledge? Such questions have attracted considerable interest in epistemology recently. These discussions, however, have not yet engaged insights about explanations and theories developed in philosophy of science. Conversely, philosophers of science have debated the nature of explanations and theories, while dismissing understanding as a psychological by-product. In this book, epistemologists and philosophers of science together (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Stephen R. Grimm, Christoph Baumberger & Sabine Ammon (eds.) (2016). Explaining Understanding: New Perspectives From Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
    What does it mean to understand something? What types of understanding can be distinguished? Is understanding always provided by explanations? And how is it related to knowledge? Such questions have attracted considerable interest in epistemology recently. These discussions, however, have not yet engaged insights about explanations and theories developed in philosophy of science. Conversely, philosophers of science have debated the nature of explanations and theories, while dismissing understanding as a psychological by-product. In this book, epistemologists and philosophers of science together (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography