18 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Sam Black [15]Samuel Black [3]
  1.  60
    Sam Black & Jon Tweedale (2002). Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: The Use and Abuse of Examples. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 6 (3):281-303.
    The philosophical debate over the compatibility between causaldeterminism and moral responsibility relies heavily on ourreactions to examples. Although we believe that there is noalternative to this methodology in this area of philosophy, someexamples that feature prominently in the literature are positivelymisleading. In this vein, we criticize the use that incompatibilistsmake of the phenomenon of ``brainwashing,'''' as well as the Frankfurt-styleexamples favored by compatibilists. We provide an instance of thekind of thought experiment that is needed to genuinely test thehypothesis that moral (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  2.  14
    Sam Black & Evan Tiffany (2007). Introduction. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (Supplement):7-40.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  70
    Sam Black & Evan Tiffany (2010). Moral Philosophy Does Not Rest on a Mistake: Reasons to Be Moral Revisited. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (5).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  39
    Samuel Black (1992). Revisionist Liberalism and the Decline of Culture. Ethics 102 (2):244-267.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  30
    Sam Black (1997). Science and Moral Skepticism in Hobbes. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (2):173 - 207.
  6.  41
    Sam Black (2007). Locke and the Skeptical Argument for Toleration. History of Philosophy Quarterly 24 (4):355-375.
  7.  22
    Samuel Black (1991). Individualism at an Impasse. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):347 - 377.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  31
    Sam Black (1998). Toleration and the Skeptical Inquirer in Locke. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (4):473 - 504.
  9.  30
    Sam Black (2001). Altruism and the Separateness of Persons. Social Theory and Practice 27 (3):361-385.
  10.  36
    Sam Black (2007). Coalitions of Reasons and Reasons to Be Moral. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (5):pp. 33-61.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  10
    Sam Black (1997). Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism. Philosophical Review 106 (3):455-461.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  11
    Sam Black (2001). The Rational and the Fair. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):115–144.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  2
    Sam Black & Evan Tiffany (2007). Introduction: Moral Philosophy Does Not Rest on a Mistake: Reasons to Be Moral Revisited. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (Supplement):7-40.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  7
    Sam Black (1997). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 37 (2):189-191.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  5
    by Scott A. Anderson, Jeremy D. Bendik‐Keymer, Samuel Black, Chad M. Cyrenne, Bart Gruzalski, Mark P. Jenkins, John Morrow, Michael A. Neblo, Tommie Shelby & James Stacey Taylor (2002). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Ethics 112 (2):421-427.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  4
    Sam Black (1993). Book Review:Skepticism and Political Participation. Aryeh Botwinick. [REVIEW] Ethics 103 (2):397-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Sam Black & Evan Tiffany (eds.) (2010). Reasons to Be Moral Revisted: Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 33. University of Calgary Press.
    H.A. Prichard argued that the “why should I be moral?” question is the central subject matter of moral theory. Prichard famously claimed to have proved that all efforts to answer that question are doomed. Many contributors to this volume of contemporary papers attempt to reconstruct Prichard’s argument. They claim either explicitly or implicitly that Prichard was mistaken, and philosophy can contribute to meaningful engagement with the ‘why be moral?’ question. A theme to emerge from these papers is that arguments like (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Sam Black (1993). Review: [Untitled]. [REVIEW] Ethics 103:397-398.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography