172 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Sandra B. Rosenthal [172]Sandra Brener Rosenthal [1]
  1. William T. Harris, Vincent Colapietro, Lewis S. Ford, Michael Forest, Rajesh Sampath, Sandra B. Rosenthal, Bruce Wilshire & Julien S. Murphy (2002). Editorial Announcement on the Speculative V. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 16 (4).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Sandra B. Rosenthal (2000). News From Abroad. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 14 (1):62-66.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  36
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2005). The Spirit of Entrepreneurship and the Qualities of Moral Decision Making: Toward a Unifying Framework. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 60 (3):307 - 315.
    At the heart of entrepreneurship are imagination, creativity, novelty, and sensitivity. It takes these qualities to develop a new product or service and bring it to market, to envision the possible impacts a new product may make and come up with novel and creative solutions to problems that may arise. These qualities go to make up what could be called the spirit of entrepreneurship, a spirit that involves the ability to handle the experimental nature of entrepreunerial activity. These same qualities (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  4.  58
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2005). Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):137 - 148.
    . Atomic individualism is embedded in most definitions of stakeholder theory, and as a result, stakeholders are not integral to the basic identity of the corporation which is considered to be independent of, and separate from, its stakeholders. Feminist theory has been suggested as a way of developing a more relational view of the corporation and its stakeholders, but it lacks a systematically developed conceptual framework for undergirding its own insights. Pragmatic philosophy is offered as a way of providing this (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  5.  57
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2000). Rethinking Business Ethics: A Pragmatic Approach. Oxford University Press.
    Using classical American pragmatism, the authors provide a philosophical framework for rethinking the nature of the corporation--how it is embedded in its natural, technological, cultural, and international environments, emphasizing throughout its pervasive relational and moral dimensions. They explore the relationship of this framework to other contemporary business ethics perspectives, as well as its implications for moral leadership in business and business education.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  6. Sandra B. Rosenthal (2003). A Time for Being Ethical: Levinas and Pragmatism. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 17 (3):192-203.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (1998). Business Ethics the Pragmatic Path Beyond Principles to Process.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  8.  41
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2006). Integrating Ethics All the Way Through: The Issue of Moral Agency Reconsidered. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2/3):233 - 239.
    Integrating "ethics all the way through" an organization suggests that the issue of moral agency and the corporation be reconsidered. Is the corporation a moral agent in some sense or is it no more than the people who are a part of the organization? Views which stress the role of the individual lose sight of the whole corporate entity, and views which think of the corporation as a collective lose sight of the individual. A view which rejects both these alternatives (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  9.  22
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1969). The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis. Southern Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):193-203.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  18
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1988). The Ultimate Logical Interpretant and the Dynamical Object. Semiotics:109-115.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  25
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2008). The Unholy Alliance of Business and Science. Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):199 - 206.
    This paper will build on a recent article appearing in the Harvard Business Review that blamed the alleged crisis in management education on the scientific model that has been adopted as the sole means of gaining knowledge about human behavior and organizations. The solution, they argue, is for business schools to realize that business management is not a scientific discipline but a profession, and deal with the things a professional education requires. We will expand on this article and discuss its (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  12.  4
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1994). Charles Peirce's Pragmatic Pluralism. State University of New York Press.
    This work runs counter to the traditional interpretations of Peirce's philosophy by eliciting an inherent strand of pragmatic pluralism that is embedded in the very core of his thought and that weaves his various doctrines into a systematic ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  13.  47
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2004). Stakeholder Theory and Public Policy: How Governments Matter. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):143-153.
    The Social Issues in Management Division has had a long history of research into various aspects of governmental influences on business. Recent years, however, have seen stakeholder theory sort of sweep the field, and under a stakeholder theory of capitalism, governments will matter less then they have in the past as stakeholder principles are implemented throughout the corporate world. This article will examine the nature of this claim by discussing problems with the implementation of stakeholder theory and examining the role (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  14.  58
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Patrick L. Bourgeois (1987). Peirce, Merleau-Ponty, and Perceptual Experience: A Kantian Heritage. International Studies in Philosophy 19 (3):33-42.
    Not only does peirce's theory of meaning as dispositional or as habit contain parallels with merleau-ponty's view of meaning in the structure of human behavior, but also both peirce and merleau-ponty alike attack reductivistic theories of perception. within this context, the present paper focuses on the use of kantian schemata in the philosophies of peirce and merleau-ponty, but to the extent that such incorporations are consistent with trends in pragmatism and phenomenology in general, it will reveal points of encounter not (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  3
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Patrick L. Bourgeois (1991). Mead and Merleau-Ponty: Toward a Common Vision. State University of New York Press.
    Unites George Herbert Mead and Maurice Merleau-Ponty in a shared rejection of substance philosophy as well as spectator theory of knowledge, in favor of a focus on the ultimacy of temporal process and the constitutive function of social praxis.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  16.  21
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1992). Free Selves, Enriched Values, and Experimental Method. International Philosophical Quarterly 32 (1):79-93.
  17. Sandra B. Rosenthal (2007). C. I. Lewis in Focus: The Pulse of Pragmatism. Indiana University Press.
    C. I. Lewis was one of the most important thinkers of his generation. In this book, Sandra B. Rosenthal explores Lewis’s philosophical vision, and links his thought to the traditions of classical American pragmatism. Tracing Lewis’s influences, she explains the central concepts informing his thinking and how he developed a unique and practical vision of the human experience. She shows how Lewis contributed to the enrichment and expansion of pragmatism, opening new paths of constructive dialogue with other traditions. This book (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18.  5
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Rogene A. Buchholz (2000). The Empirical-Normative Split in Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (2):399-408.
    The empirical-normative split in business ethics is another manifestation of the fact-value problem that has existed betweenscience and philosophy for several centuries. This paper explores classical American pragmatism’s understanding of the fact-valuedistinction, showing how it offers a different way of understanding the empirical business ethics–normative business ethics issue.Unfolding the pragmatic perspective on this issue involves a focus on its understanding of both the nature of empirical inquiry and thenature of normative inquiry.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  19.  18
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1981). C. I. Lewis and The Structure of Perceptual Beliefs. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 30:97-105.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  31
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1968). The Analytic, the Synthetic, and C. I. Lewis. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 17:115-123.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  17
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1987). Pragmatism Without Foundations. The Personalist Forum 3 (2):159-161.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  58
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2005). The Ontological Grounding of Diversity: A Pragmatic Overview. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 19 (2):107-119.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  31
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1999). Contemporary Metaphysics and the Issue of Time. International Philosophical Quarterly 39 (2):157-171.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Paul Fairfield, James Scott Johnston, Tom Rockmore, James A. Good, Jim Garrison, Barry Allen, Joseph Margolis, Sandra B. Rosenthal, Richard J. Bernstein, David Vessey, C. G. Prado, Colin Koopman, Antonio Calcagno & Inna Semetsky (2010). John Dewey and Continental Philosophy. Southern Illinois University Press.
    _John Dewey and Continental Philosophy_ provides a rich sampling of exchanges that could have taken place long ago between the traditions of American pragmatism and continental philosophy had the lines of communication been more open between Dewey and his European contemporaries. Since they were not, Paul Fairfield and thirteen of his colleagues seek to remedy the situation by bringing the philosophy of Dewey into conversation with several currents in continental philosophical thought, from post-Kantian idealism and the work of Friedrich Nietzsche (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  14
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1973). Pragmatism and the Methodology of Metaphysics. The Monist 57 (2):252-264.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  8
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1991). Dewey's Metaphysics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):147-149.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  6
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1996). Sign, Time, and the Viability of Trace. International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (1):19-28.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  38
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1987). The Pragmatic a Priori: Lewis and Dewey. Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):109-121.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  22
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2000). The Democratic Self and Moral Community. Professional Ethics 8 (3/4):79-99.
  30.  31
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2011). The Process of Pragmatism: Some Wide-Ranging Implications. The Pluralist 6 (3):5-18.
    The uprootedness of experience from its ontological embeddedness in a natural world is at the core of much contemporary philosophy which, like pragmatism, aims to reject foundationalism in all its forms. All hold positions that, in varying ways, there is a bedrock basis on which to build an edifice of knowledge, something objective that justifies rational arguments concerning what is the single best position for making available or picturing the structure of reality as it exists independently of our various contextually (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  7
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1988). Pragmatic Philosophy and the Phenomenology of Time. Southwest Philosophy Review 4 (2):7-16.
  32.  9
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1985). Mind, Modality, Meaning, and Method. Review of Metaphysics 39 (2):367-369.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  44
    Patrick L. Bourgeois & Sandra B. Rosenthal (1990). Scientific Time and the Temporal Sense of Human Existence: Merleau-Ponty and Mead. Research in Phenomenology 20 (1):152-163.
  34.  5
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1969). REVIEW:The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis. [REVIEW] Southern Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):193-203.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  11
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1986). Speculative Pragmatism. Open Court.
    Introduction CLASSICAL American pragmatism represents a historical period in American philosophy, spanning a particular time frame and including the ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  36.  24
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Rogene A. Buchholz (2000). 12. Corporate Leadership. The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:187-198.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  11
    Patrick L. Bourgeois & Sandra B. Rosenthal (1993). The Present as the Seat of Temporal Existence. International Studies in Philosophy 25 (3):1-15.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  14
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Patrick L. Bourgeois (1990). Sensation, Perception and Immediacy: Mead and Merleau-Ponty. Southwest Philosophy Review 6 (1):105-111.
    A focus on the relation between sensation and the perceptual object in the philosophies of G H Mead and Maurice Merleau-Ponty points toward their shared views of perception as non-reductionistic and holistic, as inextricably tied to the active role of the sensible body, and as involving a new understanding of the nature of immediacy within experience. This essay explores these shared views.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  11
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Rogene A. Buchhholz (1998). Bridging Environmental and Business Ethics: A Pragmatic Framework. Environmental Ethics 20 (4):393-408.
    In the last few years, some attempts have been made to overcome the disparity between environmental ethics and business ethics. However, as the situation now stands the various positions in business ethics have not incorporated any well-developed theoretical foundation for environmental issues, and conversely, environmental ethics is failing to capture an audience that could profit greatly from utilizing its theoretical insights and research. In this paper, we attempt to provide a unified conceptual framework for business ethics and environmental ethics that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  40.  12
    Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2001). A Philosophical Framework for Case Studies. Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):25 - 31.
    People who teach business ethics seem locked between two general approaches: an applied philosophy approach that emphasizes the application of abstract ethical theories and principles to specific cases, and the case method approach that leaves the students without any more general theoretical framework with which to approach ethical issues. Classical American Pragmatism, understood as a school of philosophical thought, links these two approaches by providing a new grounding for moral theory in which moral rules are understood as working hypotheses abstracted (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41.  10
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Rogene A. Buchholz (1995). Introduction. Studies in East European Thought 47 (3-4):151-154.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  20
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2000). Pragmatism. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:245-256.
    Pragmatism is a philosophy still in the making, one that has taken (and will take) novel twists and turns as the general spirit of its paradigmatic novelty moves forward. However, when creative appropriation of pragmatic themes begins to destroy this philosophic spirit and paradigmatic vision, such novelty is no longer a further development of pragmatism but, rather, a move to a different position, one that must be clearly distinguished from the pragmatic movement in American philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2005). Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):137-148.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  44.  15
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1988). John Dewey's Theory of Art, Experience and Nature. Review of Metaphysics 42 (1):129-131.
  45.  6
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1982). Primordiality, Science and Value. Review of Metaphysics 36 (2):461-463.
  46.  19
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1971). C. I. Lewis and the Paradox of the Esthetic. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 20:95-115.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  16
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (2000). The Four Good Reasons for Limiting Consumption. The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2000:85-89.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  20
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1996). Continuity, Contingency, and Time: The Divergent Intuitions of Whitehead and Pragmatism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (4):542 - 567.
  49.  2
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Rogene A. Buchholz (1995). Leadership. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 14 (3):25-41.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  14
    Patrick L. Bourgeois & Sandra B. Rosenthal (1988). Heidegger and Peirce. Southwest Philosophy Review 4 (1):103-110.
    In both the phenomenological ontology of Martin Heidegger and the pragmatism of Charles Peirce, the rejection of the Kantian phenomenal/noumenal distinction leads to a rejection of the alternatives of realism or idealism as well. In their respective denials of such an existential or ontological gap between appearance or phenomena and the ontologically real, they each establish a fundamental intentional unity between man and world which cannot be understood within the framework of realism or of idealism and which reveals deeply rooted (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 172