74 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Sandra Harding [60]Sandra G. Harding [14]
  1.  57
    Sandra Harding (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking From Women's Lives. Cornell University.
    Sandra Harding here develops further the themes first addressed in her widely influential book, The Science Question in Feminism, and conducts a compelling analysis of feminist theories on the philosophical problem of how we know what we ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   126 citations  
  2. Eva Feder Kittay, Carol Gilligan, Annette C. Baier, Michael Stocker, Christina H. Sommers, Kathryn Pyne Addelson, Virginia Held, Thomas E. Hill Jr, Seyla Benhabib, George Sher, Marilyn Friedman, Jonathan Adler, Sara Ruddick, Mary Fainsod, David D. Laitin, Lizbeth Hasse & Sandra Harding (1989). Women and Moral Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    To find more information about Rowman and Littlefield titles, please visit www.rowmanlittlefield.com.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   112 citations  
  3.  52
    Sandra G. Harding (1988). [Book Review] the Science Question in Feminism. [REVIEW] Feminist Studies 14 (1):561-574.
    This essay is a critical review of Sandra Harding's The Science Question in Feminism. Her text constitutes a monumental effort to capture an overview of recent feminist critique of science and to develop a feminist dialectical and materialist conception of the history of masculinist science. In this analysis of Harding's work, the organizing categories as well as the main assumptions of the text are reconstructed for closer examination within the context of modern feminist critique of science and feminist theory in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   173 citations  
  4. Sandra Harding (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Cornell University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   74 citations  
  5. Sandra G. Harding (ed.) (2004). The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Routledge.
    In the mid-1970s and early 1980s, several feminist theorists began developing alternatives to the traditional methods of scientific research. The result was a new theory, now recognized as Standpoint Theory, which caused heated debate and radically altered the way research is conducted. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader is the first anthology to collect the most important essays on the subject as well as more recent works that bring the topic up-to-date. Leading feminist scholar and one of the founders of Standpoint (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   24 citations  
  6.  2
    Sandra Harding & N. Vassallo (2001). Is Science Multi-Cultural? Postcolonialism, Feminism, and Epistemologies. Epistemologia 24 (1):157-158.
  7.  79
    Sandra G. Harding & Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.) (2003). Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    This collection of essays, first published two decades ago, presents central feminist critiques and analyses of natural and social sciences and their philosophies. Unfortunately, in spite of the brilliant body of research and scholarship in these fields in subsequent decades, the insights of these essays remain as timely now as they were then: philosophy and the sciences still presume kinds of social innocence to which they are not entitled. The essays focus on Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Hobbes, Rousseau, and Marx; on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  8. Sandra Harding (2008). Sciences From Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. Duke University Press Books.
    In _Sciences from Below_, the esteemed feminist science studies scholar Sandra Harding synthesizes modernity studies with progressive tendencies in science and technology studies to suggest how scientific and technological pursuits might be more productively linked to social justice projects around the world. Harding illuminates the idea of multiple modernities as well as the major contributions of post-Kuhnian Western, feminist, and postcolonial science studies. She explains how these schools of thought can help those seeking to implement progressive social projects refine their (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  9. Sandra G. Harding & Jean F. O'barr (1987). Sex and Scientific Inquiry. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  10.  23
    Uma Narayan & Sandra Harding (eds.) (2000). Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial, and Feminist World. Indiana University Press.
    The essays in this volume bring to their focuses on philosophical issues the new angles of vision created by the multicultural, global, and postcolonial feminisms that have been developing around us.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  11. Sandra G. Harding (2004). A Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science? Resources From Standpoint Theory's Controversiality. Hypatia 19 (1):25-47.
    : Feminist standpoint theory remains highly controversial: it is widely advocated, used to guide research and justify its results, and yet is also vigorously denounced. This essay argues that three such sites of controversy reveal the value of engaging with standpoint theory as a way of reflecting on and debating some of the most anxiety-producing issues in contemporary Western intellectual and political life. Engaging with standpoint theory enables a socially relevant philosophy of science.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  12. Sandra Harding (2008). Sciences From Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. Duke University Press Books.
    In _Sciences from Below_, the esteemed feminist science studies scholar Sandra Harding synthesizes modernity studies with progressive tendencies in science and technology studies to suggest how scientific and technological pursuits might be more productively linked to social justice projects around the world. Harding illuminates the idea of multiple modernities as well as the major contributions of post-Kuhnian Western, feminist, and postcolonial science studies. She explains how these schools of thought can help those seeking to implement progressive social projects refine their (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  13. Sandra Harding (1995). “Strong Objectivity”: A Response to the New Objectivity Question. Synthese 104 (3):331 - 349.
    Where the old objectivity question asked, Objectivity or relativism: which side are you on?, the new one refuses this choice, seeking instead to bypass widely recognized problems with the conceptual framework that restricts the choices to these two. It asks, How can the notion of objectivity be updated and made useful for contemporary knowledge-seeking projects? One response to this question is the strong objectivity program that draws on feminist standpoint epistemology to provide a kind of logic of discovery for maximizing (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  14. Robert Figueroa & Sandra G. Harding (eds.) (2003). Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology. Routledge.
    In this pioneering new book, Sandra Harding and Robert Figueroa bring together an important collection of original essays by leading philosophers exploring an extensive range of diversity issues for the philosophy of science and technology. The essays gathered in this volume extend current philosophical discussion of science and technology beyond the standard feminist and gender analyses that have flourished over the past two decades, by bringing a thorough and truly diverse set of cultural, racial, and ethical concerns to bear on (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  15.  32
    Sandra Harding (1992). After the Neutrality Ideal: Science, Politics, and "Strong Objectivity". Social Research 59:567-588.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  16. Sandra G. Harding (1976). Can Theories Be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis. Reidel.
  17. What Is‘Strong Objectivity, Sandra Harding & Donna Haraway (1996). Both Ways. In Evelyn Fox Keller & Helen E. Longino (eds.), Feminism and Science. Oxford University Press
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  18.  32
    Sandra Harding (2009). Standpoint Theories: Productively Controversial. Hypatia 24 (4):192 - 200.
  19. Sandra Harding (1989). Feminism and Methodology. Hypatia 3 (3):162-164.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  20. Sandra G. Harding (1987). Feminism and Methodology Social Science Issues. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  21. Sandra Harding (2004). Introduction: Standpoint Theory as a Site of Political, Philosophic, and Scientific Debate. In Sandra G. Harding (ed.), The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Routledge 1--15.
  22.  8
    Sandra Harding (ed.) (1993). The "Racial" Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Indiana University Press.
    "The classic and recent essays gathered here will challenge scholars in the natural sciences, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, and women’s studies to examine the role of racism in the construction and application of the sciences. Harding... has also created a useful text for diverse classroom settings." —Library Journal "A rich lode of readily accessible thought on the nature and practice of science in society. Highly recommended." —Choice "This is an excellent collection of essays that should prove useful in a wide range (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  23. Sandra Harding (ed.) (1993). The "Racial" Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Indiana University Press.
    "The classic and recent essays gathered here will challenge scholars in the natural sciences, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, and women’s studies to examine the role of racism in the construction and application of the sciences. Harding... has also created a useful text for diverse classroom settings." —Library Journal "A rich lode of readily accessible thought on the nature and practice of science in society. Highly recommended." —Choice "This is an excellent collection of essays that should prove useful in a wide range (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  24.  34
    Sandra Harding (1987). The Method Question. Hypatia 2 (3):19 - 35.
    A continuing concern of many feminists and non-feminists alike has been to identify a distinctive feminist method of inquiry. This essay argues that this method question is misguided and should be abandoned. In doing so it takes up the distinctions between and relationships among methods, methodologies and epistemologies; proposes that the concern to identify sources of the power of feminist analyses motivates the method question; and suggests how to pursue this project.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  25.  4
    Graham Priest & Sandra Harding (1977). Can Theories Be Refuted? Philosophical Quarterly 27 (106):73.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  26.  4
    Sandra Harding (2003). A World of Sciences. In Robert Figueroa & Sandra G. Harding (eds.), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology. Routledge 49--69.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  27.  30
    Sandra Harding & Uma Narayan (1998). Border Crossings: Multicultural and Postcolonial Feminist Challenges to Philosophy (Part II). Hypatia 13 (3):1-5.
  28. Sandra Harding (2006). Transformation Vs. Resistance Identity Projects: Epistemological Resources for Social Justice Movements. In Linda Alcoff (ed.), Identity Politics Reconsidered. Palgrave Macmillan 246--263.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  1
    Sandra Harding (forthcoming). Précis of Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research. Philosophical Studies:1-6.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  26
    Sandra Harding (2005). From the Woman Question in Science to the Science Question in Feminism. In Nico Stehr & Reiner Grundmann (eds.), Knowledge: Critical Concepts. Routledge 327--342.
  31.  42
    Sandra Harding (1998). Gender, Development, and Post-Enlightenment Philosophies of Science. Hypatia 13 (3):146 - 167.
    Recent "gender, environment, and sustainable development" accounts raise pointed questions about the complicity of Enlightenment philosophies of science with failures of Third World development policies and the current environmental crisis. The strengths of these analyses come from distinctive ways they link androcentric, economistic, and nature-blind aspects of development thinking to "the Enlightenment dream." In doing so they share perspectives with and provide resources for other influential schools of science studies.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32.  4
    Sandra Harding (2004). A Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science? Resources From Standpoint Theory's Controversiality. Hypatia 19 (1):25-47.
  33.  5
    Sandra Harding (1982). Is Gender a Variable in Conceptions of Rationality? A Survey of Issues. Dialectica 36 (2‐3):225-242.
    SummaryPhilosophic questions about the adequacy of our prevailing Western conceptions of rationality have emerged from the growing recognition that one cannot simply “add women” as objects of knowledge to the existing bodies of our social and natural knowledge. Recent research in psychology and in moral development theory suggests that our understandings of the rationality of human activity are distorted and obscured by systematically identifying as universally desireable, as Human goals, conceptions of the self, others, and the appropriate relationships between the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  34.  10
    Sandra Harding, After Mr. Nowhere: What Kind of Proper Self for a Scientist?
    The conventional proper scientific self has an ethical obligation to strive to see everywhere in the universe from no particular location in that universe: he is to produce the view from nowhere. What different conceptions of the proper scientific self are created by the distinctive assumptions and research practices of social justice movements, such as feminism, anti-racism, and post-colonialism? Three such new ideals are: the multiple and conflicted knowing self; the researcher strategically located inside her research world; and the community (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  8
    Sandra Harding (2006). Two Influential Theories of Ignorance and Philosophy's Interests in Ignoring Them. Hypatia 21 (3):20-36.
  36.  54
    Sandra Harding (2005). "Science and Democracy:" Replayed or Redesigned? Social Epistemology 19 (1):5 – 18.
    Mid-Twentieth Century declarations characterizing science as a 'Little democracy' and as autonomous from society continue to shape the arguments of scientists' and critics of science studies, including Meera Nanda's arguments. Yet such an image of science has long lost whatever empirical support it ever posessed. This article shares Nanda's concern to envision sciences which support social justice projects, but not the particular criticisms she makes of Feminist, post-colonial, and post-kuhnian science studies.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  19
    Sandra Harding (1996). Multicultural and Global Feminist Philosophies of Science: Resources and Challenges. In Lynn Hankinson Nelson & Jack Nelson (eds.), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. 263--287.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  51
    Sandra Harding (2006). Two Influential Theories of Ignorance and Philosophy's Interests in Ignoring Them. Hypatia 21 (3):20-36.
    Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud provided powerful accounts of systematic interested ignorance. Fifty years ago, Anglo-American philosophies of science stigmatized Marx's and Freud's analyses as models of irrationality. They remain disvalued today, at a time when virtually all other humanities and social science disciplines have returned to extract valuable insights from them. Here the argument is that there are reasons distinctive to philosophy why such theories were especially disvalued then and why they remain so today. However, there are even better (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  59
    Sandra Harding (2006). Modernity, Science, and Democracy. Social Philosophy Today 22:17-42.
    Thinking about Western sciences has always also meant making assumptions about modernity and about democratic social relations. Yet in recent decades the standard meanings and referents of all three of these terms—”Western sciences,” “modernity,” and “democratic social relations”—have come under skeptical scrutiny. This essay will look at three critics of modernity who also examine the political practices and consequences of Western sciences. All three also think postmodernisms to be valuable but merely symptomologies without useful prescriptions for change, and they all (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  39
    Uma Narayan & Sandra Harding (1998). Introduction. Border Crossings: Multicultural and Postcolonial Feminist Challenges to Philosophy (Part I). Hypatia 13 (2):1-6.
  41.  13
    Sandra Harding (1994). Ist Die Westliche Wissenschaft Eine Ethnowissenschaft? Herausforderung Und Chance Für Die Feministische Wissenschaftsforschung. Die Philosophin 5 (9):26-44.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  8
    Sandra G. Harding (1979). The Social Function of the Empiricist Conception of Mind. Metaphilosophy 10 (1):38–47.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43. Sandra Harding (1987). The Curious Coincidence of Feminine and African Moralities: Challenges for Feminist Theory. In Eva Feder Kittay & Diana T. Meyers (eds.), Women and Moral Theory. Rowman & Littlefield 296--315.
  44.  2
    Sandra Harding (1987). Ascetic Intellectual Opportunities: Reply to Alison Wylie. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (sup1):75-85.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  26
    Sandra Harding (1990). Starting Thought From Women's Lives: Eight Resources for Maximizing Objectivity. Journal of Social Philosophy 21 (2-3):140-149.
  46.  30
    Sandra Harding (1976). The Inconsistent Scientific Realist. Philosophical Studies 30 (3):203 - 205.
    Many philosophers who consider themselves scientific realists also argue for physicalism (quine is one). But if scientific realism is construed in such a way that it is logically independent of physicalism, One cannot consistently defend both positions. If it is construed so that it is not independent of physicalism, The problem is simply displaced to an incoherence within scientific realism. "historical physicalism" is what scientific realists should be defending. But so far no scientific realists have defended this version of physicalism.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  6
    Herlinde Pauer-Studer & Sandra Harding (1991). Ein Interview von Herlinde Pauer-Studer MIT Sandra Harding. Die Philosophin 2 (4):47-50.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  21
    Sandra G. Harding (1978). Four Contributions Values Can Make to the Objectivity of Social Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:199 - 209.
    Carnap reports that while all of the members of the Vienna Circle "were strongly interested in social and political progress," except for Neurath, they all insisted that the "intrusion" of political points of view into the methodology of science would violate the purity of scientific method. In opposition to this still dominant view of the relationship between moral/political values and objective inquiry, this paper specifies four ways in which certain moral/political values are necessary for maximizing objective inquiry in social science. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Sandra Harding (2015). Objectivity for Sciences From Below. In Jonathan Y. Tsou, Alan Richardson & Flavia Padovani (eds.), Objectivity in Science. Springer International Publishing
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  26
    Sandra Harding (2008). How Many Epistemologies Should Guide the Production of Scientific Knowledge?: A Response to Maffie, Mendieta, and Wylie. Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 212-219.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 74