5 found
Sort by:
  1. Sandro Zucchi (2009). Along the Time Line. Natural Language Semantics 17 (2):99-139.
    In Italian Sign Language (LIS), when past or future time adverbs are present, the signs for verbs exhibit the same manual configurations whether the sentence reports a past event or a future event. Facts of this kind, also observed for American Sign Language (ASL) and other sign languages, have led some authors (Friedman, among others) to conclude that these languages, on a par with spoken languages like Chinese, lack grammatical tense. Neidle et al. and Jacobowitz and Stokoe have challenged this (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Sandro Zucchi (2005). The Present Mode. In Greg N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), Reference and Quantification: The Partee Effect. Csli. 1--28.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Andrea Bonomi & Sandro Zucchi (2003). A Pragmatic Framework for Truth in Fiction. Dialectica 57 (2):103–120.
    In this paper we propose a semantic analysis of sentences of the form "In fiction x, p" based on this picture of context. We argue that the derived contexts for sentences in the scope of "In fiction X" are determined by three factors: what the beliefs of the author are taken to be, the conventions established for the fiction, and a defeasible presumption of reliability of the narrator. We develop a formal implementation based on the notion of a system of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Sandro Zucchi & Michael White (2001). Twigs, Sequences and the Temporal Constitution of Predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (2):223-270.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Sandro Zucchi (1999). Incomplete Events, Intensionality and Imperfective Aspect. Natural Language Semantics 7 (2):179-215.
    I discuss two competing theories of the progressive: the theory proposed in Parsons (1980, 1985, 1989, 1990) and the theory proposed in Landman (1992). These theories differ in more than one way. Landman regards the progressive as an intentional operator, while Parsons doesn't. Moreover, Landman and Parsons disagree on what uninflected predicates denote. For Landman, cross the street has in its denotation complete events of crossing the street; the aspectual contribution of English simple past (perfective aspect) is the identity function. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation