7 found
Sort by:
  1. Jake Kurczek, Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Melissa Duff (2013). Hippocampal Contributions to Language: Evidence of Referential Processing Deficits in Amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (4):1346.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Eun-Kyung Lee, Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Duane G. Watson (2013). Ways of Looking Ahead: Hierarchical Planning in Language Production. Cognition 129 (3):544-562.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Si On Yoon & Sarah Brown-Schmidt (2013). What is the Context of Prediction? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):376-377.
    We agree with Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) claim that theories of language processing must address the interconnection of language production and comprehension. However, we have two concerns: First, the central notion of context when predicting what another person will say is underspecified. Second, it is not clear that P&G's dual-mechanism model captures the data better than a single-mechanism model would.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Melissa C. Duff & Sarah Brown-Schmidt (2012). The Hippocampus and the Flexible Use and Processing of Language. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6.
    Fundamental to all human languages is an unlimited expressive capacity and creative flexibility that allow speakers to rapidly generate novel and complex utterances. In turn, listeners interpret language “on-line”, incrementally integrating multiple sources of information as words unfold over time. A challenge for theories of language processing has been to understand how speakers and listeners generate, gather, integrate, and maintain representations in service of language processing. We propose that many of the processes by which we use language place high demands (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Christine Gunlogson & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2008). Addressees Distinguish Shared From Private Information When Interpreting Questions During Interactive Conversation. Cognition 107 (3):1122-1134.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Agnieszka E. Konopka (2008). Little Houses and Casas Pequeñas: Message Formulation and Syntactic Form in Unscripted Speech with Speakers of English and Spanish. Cognition 109 (2):274-280.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2004). Priming and Alignment: Mechanism or Consequence? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):193-194.
    We agree with Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) proposal that dialogue is an important empirical and theoretical test bed for models of language processing. However, we offer two cautionary notes. First, the enterprise will require explicit computational models. Second, such models will need to incorporate both joint and separate speaker and hearer commitments in ways that go beyond priming and alignment.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation