Search results for 'Sarah E. Stoller' (try it on Scholar)

4 found
Sort by:
  1. Sarah E. Stoller (2008). Why We Are Not Morally Required to Select the Best Children: A Response to Savulescu. Bioethics 22 (7):364-369.score: 870.0
    The purpose of this paper is to review critically Julian Savulescu's principle of 'Procreative Beneficence,' which holds that prospective parents are morally obligated to select, of the possible children they could have, those with the greatest chance of leading the best life. According to this principle, prospective parents are obliged to use the technique of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to select for the 'best' embryos, a decision that ought to be made based on the presence or absence of both disease (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Michael E. Stoller (1985). Wilhelm Berges (†) and Hans Jürgen Rieckenberg, Die älteren Hildesheimer Inschriften bis zum Tode Bischof Hezilos († 1079). (Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 3/131.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1983. Paper. Pp. 214 plus 35 plates. DM 98. [REVIEW] Speculum 60 (2):470.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Josef Rhemann (2012). Silvia Stoller: Existenz – Differenz – Konstruktion. Phänomenologie der Geschlechtlichkeit bei Beauvoir, Irigaray und Butler (Reihe „Übergänge“, Bd. 57, hg. von Wolfgang Eßbach und Bernhard Waldenfels). [REVIEW] Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 65 (1):053-059.score: 120.0
  4. Andrew Hotke (2014). The Principle of Procreative Beneficence: Old Arguments and A New Challenge. Bioethics 28 (5):255-262.score: 24.0
    In the last ten years, there have been a number of attempts to refute Julian Savulescu's Principle of Procreative Beneficence; a principle which claims that parents have a moral obligation to have the best child that they can possibly have. So far, no arguments against this principle have succeeded at refuting it. This paper tries to explain the shortcomings of some of the more notable arguments against this principle. I attempt to break down the argument for the principle and in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation