Search results for 'Sarah J. Tennant' (try it on Scholar)

13 found
Sort by:
  1. A. E. Taylor, C. W. Valentine, T. H. Pear, John Laird, Bernard Bosanquet, H. F. Hallett, B. H., W. J., F. R. Tennant, Dasgupta S. N., R. D., Henry J. Watt, H. Wildon Carr & F. C. S. Schiller (1922). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 31 (1):208-242.score: 2400.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Nick Turner & Sarah J. Tennant (2010). “As Far as is Reasonably Practicable”: Socially Constructing Risk, Safety, and Accidents in Military Operations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1):21 - 33.score: 870.0
    This research examines how the meaning of risk, safety, and accidents are constructed in a military context. We compare meanings of these constructs among members working for three organizations (Health and Safety Executive, Ministry of Defence, and Royal Marine Commandos) jointly responsible for planning and executing "safe" military training and maneuvres in a particular unit of the United Kingdom's Royal Marine Commandos. The discourse among these members embodies the inter-organizational collaboration over military safety, and through an analysis of this discourse (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Neil Tennant (1998). Games Some People Would Have All of Us Play: A Critical Study of J. Hintikka, The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 6 (1):226-241.score: 360.0
  4. M. A., P. Leon, H. B. Acton, W. G. de Burgh, F. R. Tennant, H. R. Mackintosh, A. S., J. Wisdom, Rex Knight, F. C. S. Schiller, T. E. Jessop & J. S. Mackenzie (1934). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 43 (170):238-265.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Norman Kemp Smith, H. B. Acton, F. R. Tennant, J. Wisdom, H. J. Paton, John Laird, M. Black, J. O. Wisdom & Alban G. Widgery (1938). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 47 (188):520-539.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Clement C. J. Webb, Cyril Burt, John Laird, T. E. Jessop, David Baumgardt, J. O. Wisdom, H. B. Acton, David Baumgardt, E. W. Edwards & F. R. Tennant (1938). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 47 (185):98-121.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Neil Tennant (2006). New Foundations for a Relational Theory of Theory-Revision. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (5):489 - 528.score: 120.0
    AGM-theory, named after its founders Carlos Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors and David Makinson, is the leading contemporary paradigm in the theory of belief-revision. The theory is reformulated here so as to deal with the central relational notions 'J is a contraction of K with respect to A' and 'J is a revision of K with respect to A'. The new theory is based on a principal-case analysis of the domains of definition of the three main kinds of theory-change (expansion, contraction and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. A. S. Owen (1928). Some Verse Translations 1. Prometheus: I. Prometheus Bound of Aeschylus—a Metrical Version; II. Prometheus Unbound. By Clarence W. Mendell. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1926. 9s. 2. The Antigone of Sophocles. Translated by Hugh Macnaghten. Cambridge University Press, 1926. 2s. Net. 3. The Electra of Sophocles, with the First Part of the Peace of Aristophanes. Translated by J. T. Sheppard. Cambridge University Press, 1927. 2s. 6d. Net. 4. The Hippolytus of Euripides. Translated by Kenneth Johnstone. Published by Philip Mason for the Balliol Players, 1927. 2s. Net. 5. The Bacchanals of Euripides. Translated by Margaret Kinmont Tennant. Methuen and Co., Ltd., 1926. 6. Aristophanes. Vol. I. Translated by Arthur S. Way, D.Litt. Macmillan and Co., 1927. 10s. 6d. Net. 7. Others Abide. Translations From the Greek Anthology by Humbert Wolfe. Ernest Benn, Ltd., 1927. 6s. Net. 8. The Plays of Terence. Translated Into Parallel English Metres by William Ritchie, Professor of Latin in the Unive. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (02):64-67.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. J. P. Burgess (2005). Neil Tennant. The Taming of the True. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. Pp. Xviii + 466. ISBN 0-19-823717-0 (Cloth), 0-19-925160-6 (Paper). [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 13 (2):202-215.score: 36.0
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. J. Ellis McTaggart (1903). Book Review:The Origin and Propagation of Sin. F. R. Tennant. [REVIEW] Ethics 14 (1):128-.score: 36.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. J. Oliver Buswell (1950). The Philosophies of F. R. Tennant and John Dewey. New York, Philosophical Library.score: 36.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Thorsten Sander (2006). Fitch's Paradox and the Problem of Shared Content. Abstracta 3 (1):74-86.score: 24.0
    According to the “paradox of knowability”, the moderate thesis that (necessarily) all truths are knowable – ‘∀p (p ⊃ ◊Kp) ’ – implies the seemingly preposterous claim that all truths are actually known – ‘∀p (p ⊃ Kp) ’ –, i.e. that we are omniscient. If Fitch’s argument were successful, it would amount to a knockdown rebuttal of anti-realism by reductio. In the paper I defend the nowadays rather neglected strategy of intuitionistic revisionism. Employing only intuitionistically acceptable rules of inference, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. Ketland (2010). Truth, Conservativeness, and Provability: Reply to Cieslinski. Mind 119 (474):423-436.score: 12.0
    Cieslinski has given an interesting response to Shapiro 1998 and Ketland 1999, which argued that deflationary truth theories are inadequate, since they lack the property of ‘reflective adequacy’. Cieslinski’s response, following Tennant (2002, 2005), aims to explain, without a detour using truth axioms, why someone who accepts the axioms of a theory should also accept its reflection principles. The argument is formulated very clearly (in fact, to justify a different reflection principle), and involves a couple of important assumptions, the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation