167 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
T. M. Scanlon [63]Thomas Scanlon [26]John Scanlon [19]Michael J. Scanlon [12]
George T. Scanlon [7]Thomas M. Scanlon [5]T. Scanlon [5]Eileen Scanlon [5]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Grant Scanlon (Grand Valley State University)
Profile: John Scanlon (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)
Profile: Rory Scanlon
  1. Thomas Scanlon (2008). Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    The illusory appeal of double effect -- The significance of intent -- Means and ends -- Blame.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   107 citations  
  2. Thomas Scanlon (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    In this book, T. M. Scanlon offers new answers to these questions, as they apply to the central part of morality that concerns what we owe to each other.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   695 citations  
  3.  50
    T. M. Scanlon (2014). Being Realistic About Reasons. Oxford University Press.
    It is often claimed that irreducibly normative truths would have unacceptable metaphysical implications, and are incompatible with a scientific view of the world. The book argues, on the basis of a general account of the relevance of ontological questions, that this claim is mistaken. It is also a mistake to think that interpreting normative judgments as beliefs would make it impossible to explain their connection with action. An agent’s acceptance of a normative judgment can explain that agent’s subsequent action because (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   24 citations  
  4. Thomas M. Scanlon (2013). Giving Desert its Due. Philosophical Explorations 16 (2):1-16.
  5. Thomas Scanlon (2007). Structural Irrationality. In Geoffrey Brennan, Robert Goodin, Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), Common Minds: Themes From the Philosophy of Philip Pettit. Clarendon Press
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   30 citations  
  6. T. M. Scanlon (2010). Metaphysics and Morals. In Mario de Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. Columbia University Press 7 - 22.
    This essay argues that normative judgments, in general, and moral judgments, in particular, are "truth apt" and can be objects of belief. Other main claims are: judgments about reasons, if interpreted as true, do not have metaphysical implications that are incompatible with a scientific view of the world. Two kinds of normative claims should be distinguished: substantive claims about what reasons people have and structural claims about what attitudes people must have insofar as they are rational. Employing this distinction, the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  7. T. M. Scanlon (2008). Index. In Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. Harvard University Press 243-247.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  8. Thomas M. Scanlon (1982). Contractualism and Utilitarianism. In Amartya Kumar Sen & Bernard Arthur Owen Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press 103--110.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   61 citations  
  9.  71
    T. M. Scanlon (2003). 3 Rawls on Justification. In Samuel Richard Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press 139.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  10.  78
    T. M. Scanlon (2003). Thickness and Theory. Journal of Philosophy 100 (6):275-287.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  91
    T. M. Scanlon, The Diversity of Objections to Inequality.
    This is the text of The Lindley Lecture for 1996, given by T.M. Scanlon, an American philosopher.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  12. T. M. Scanlon (1975). Preference and Urgency. Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):655-669.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   45 citations  
  13. Thomas Scanlon (1972). A Theory of Freedom of Expression. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2):204-226.
    The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  14. T. M. Scanlon (2003). The Difficulty of Tolerance Essays in Political Philosophy. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    These essays in political philosophy by T. M. Scanlon, written between 1969 and 1999, examine the standards by which social and political institutions should be justified and appraised. Scanlon explains how the powers of just institutions are limited by rights such as freedom of expression, and considers why these limits should be respected even when it seems that better results could be achieved by violating them. Other topics which are explored include voluntariness and consent, freedom of expression, tolerance, punishment, and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  15. T. M. Scanlon (2011). The Unity of the Normative. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 154 (3):443-450.
    From the issue entitled "With Book Symposium on Judith Thomson's Normativity".
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  16.  4
    Rachel Vreeman, Eunice Kamaara, Allan Kamanda, David Ayuku, Winstone Nyandiko, Lukoye Atwoli, Samuel Ayaya, Peter Gisore, Michael Scanlon & Paula Braitstein (2012). A Qualitative Study Using Traditional Community Assemblies to Investigate Community Perspectives on Informed Consent and Research Participation in Western Kenya. BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):23-.
    Background International collaborators face challenges in the design and implementation of ethical biomedical research. Evaluating community understanding of research and processes like informed consent may enable researchers to better protect research participants in a particular setting; however, there exist few studies examining community perspectives in health research, particularly in resource-limited settings, or strategies for engaging the community in research processes. Our goal was to inform ethical research practice in a biomedical research setting in western Kenya and similar resource-limited settings. Methods (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  17. T. M. Scanlon (2013). Responsibility and the Value of Choice. Think 12 (33):9-16.
    Research Articles T. M. Scanlon, Think, FirstView Article.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. T. M. Scanlon (2002). Reasons, Responsibility, and Reliance: Replies to Wallace, Dworkin, and Deigh. Ethics 112 (3):507-528.
  19.  87
    T. M. Scanlon (2000). Intention and Permissibility, I. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):301–317.
    [T. M. Scanlon] It is clearly impermissible to kill one person because his organs can be used to save five others who are in need of transplants. It has seemed to many that the explanation for this lies in the fact that in such cases we would be intending the death of the person whom we killed, or failed to save. What makes these actions impermissible, however, is not the agent's intention but rather the fact that the benefit envisaged does (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  20. Thomas Scanlon (1990). Promises and Practices. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (3):199-226.
  21.  97
    T. M. Scanlon (2003). Replies. Ratio 16 (4):424–439.
  22.  6
    John D. Caputo & Michael J. Scanlon (eds.) (1999). God, the Gift, and Postmodernism. Indiana University Press.
    Pushing past the constraints of postmodernism which cast "reason" and"religion" in opposition, God, the Gift, and Postmodernism, seizes the opportunity to question the authority of "the modern" and open the limits of possible experience, including the call to religious experience, as a new millennium approaches. Jacques Derrida, the father of deconstruction, engages with Jean-Luc Marion and other religious philosophers to entertain questions about intention, givenness, and possibility which reveal the extent to which deconstruction is structured like religion. New interpretations of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  23.  52
    T. M. Scanlon (2007). Wrongness and Reasons: A Re-Examination. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Clarendon Press
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  24.  24
    T. M. Scanlon (2002). Replies. Social Theory and Practice 28 (2):337-358.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  25.  8
    T. M. Scanlon (2012). The Appeal and Limits Of. In Jimmy Lenman & Yonatan Shemmer (eds.), Constructivism in Practical Philosophy. Oxford University Press 226.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26. T. M. Scanlon (1988). The Significance of Choice. In Sterling M. McMurrin (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Vol. 8, pp. 149-216). University of Utah Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  27. R. Jay Wallace, Gerald Dworkin, John Deigh, T. M. Scanlon, Peter Vallentyne & Alan Patten (2002). 10. William A. Edmundson, Ed., The Duty to Obey the Law: Selected Philosophical Readings William A. Edmundson, Ed., The Duty to Obey the Law: Selected Philosophical Readings (Pp. 614-616). [REVIEW] Ethics 112 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  28. Thomas Scanlon (1976). Nozick on Rights, Liberty, and Property. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1):3-25.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  40
    T. M. Scanlon (2013). Reply to Zofia Stemplowska. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):508-514.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30. T. M. Scanlon (2001). Symposium on Amartya Sen's Philosophy: 3 Sen and Consequentialism. Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):39-50.
    It is a particular pleasure to be able to participate in this symposium in honor of Amartya Sen. We agree on a wide range of topics, but I will focus here on an area of relative disagreement. Sen is much more attracted to consequentialism than I am, and the main topic of my paper will be the particular version of consequentialism that he has articulated and the reasons why he is drawn to this view.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  31.  5
    Rahim Moosa & Thomas Scanlon (2014). Model Theory of Fields with Free Operators in Characteristic Zero. Journal of Mathematical Logic 14 (2):1450009.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32.  19
    T. M. Scanlon (1992). The Aims and Authority of Moral Theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12 (1):1-23.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  33.  10
    Thomas Scanlon (2016). Individual Morality and the Morality of Institutions. Filozofija I Društvo 27 (1):3-36.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. T. M. Scanlon Jr (1986). Equality of Resources and Equality of Welfare: A Forced Marriage? Ethics 97 (1):111-118.
  35.  10
    Jan Krajíček & Thomas Scanlon (2000). Combinatorics with Definable Sets: Euler Characteristics and Grothendieck Rings. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (3):311-330.
    We recall the notions of weak and strong Euler characteristics on a first order structure and make explicit the notion of a Grothendieck ring of a structure. We define partially ordered Euler characteristic and Grothendieck ring and give a characterization of structures that have non-trivial partially ordered Grothendieck ring. We give a generalization of counting functions to locally finite structures, and use the construction to show that the Grothendieck ring of the complex numbers contains as a subring the ring of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  36. T. M. Scanlon (2003). The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    These essays in political philosophy by T. M. Scanlon, written between 1969 and 1999, examine the standards by which social and political institutions should be justified and appraised. Scanlon explains how the powers of just institutions are limited by rights such as freedom of expression, and considers why these limits should be respected even when it seems that better results could be achieved by violating them. Other topics which are explored include voluntariness and consent, freedom of expression, tolerance, punishment, and (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  37.  59
    Thomas Scanlon (1975). Thomson on Privacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):315-322.
  38.  24
    Thomas M. Scanlon (1991). The Moral Basis of Interpersonal Comparisons. In Jon Elster & John E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge University Press 17--44.
  39. T. M. Scanlon (1977). Rights, Goals, and Fairness. Erkenntnis 11 (1):81 - 95.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  79
    T. M. Scanlon (2000). A Contractualist Reply. Theoria 66 (3):237-245.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41. T. M. Scanlon (2003). Précis of What We Owe to Each Other. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):159–161.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42. T. M. Scanlon (2006). Reasons: A Puzzling Duality? In R. Jay Wallace, Philip Pettit, Samuel Scheffler & Michael Smith (eds.), Reason and Value: Themes From the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Clarendon Press
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  43. Anand Pillay & Thomas Scanlon (2002). Compact Complex Manifolds with the DOP and Other Properties. Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):737-743.
    We point out that a certain complex compact manifold constructed by Lieberman has the dimensional order property, and has U-rank different from Morley rank. We also give a sufficient condition for a Kahler manifold to be totally degenerate (that is, to be an indiscernible set, in its canonical language) and point out that there are K3 surfaces which satisfy these conditions.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Lawrence E. Scanlon & D. W. Gotshalk (1960). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 19 (1):99-100.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Ronald Dworkin, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, John Rawls & Thomas Scanlon (1997). The Case for Legalised Euthanasia. The Philosophers' Magazine 1 (1):26-31.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  32
    T. M. Scanlon (1995). Moral Theory: Understanding and Disagreement. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):343-356.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  47. T. M. Scanlon (1973). The Consistency of Number Theory Via Herbrand's Theorem. Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (1):29-58.
  48.  96
    T. M. Scanlon (2012). Justification and Legitimation: Comments on Sebastiano Maffettone's Rawls: An Introduction. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (9):887-892.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  33
    Thomas Scanlon (2010). Ambiguity of "Intention". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):348-349.
    Knobe reports that subjects' judgments of whether an agent did something intentionally vary depending on whether the outcome in question was seen by them as good or as bad. He concludes that subjects' moral views affect their judgments about intentional action. This conclusion appears to follow only if different meanings of “intention” are overlooked.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  63
    T. M. Scanlon (2003). Reply to Gauthier and Gibbard. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):176–189.
1 — 50 / 167