Search results for 'Scholasticism' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Carl R. Trueman & R. S. Clark (eds.) (2006). Protestant Scholasticism: Essays in Reassessment.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Thomas J. Blakeley (1961). Soviet Scholasticism. Dordrecht, D. Reidel.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Gerardo Bruni (1929). Progressive Scholasticism. London, B. Herder.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jacques Maritain (1940/1972). Scholasticism and Politics. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Josef Pieper (1960/2001). Scholasticism: Personalities and Problems of Medieval Philosophy. St. Augustine's Press.score: 15.0
  6. David Charles Riede (1972). Scholasticism, Humanism, and Reform. Dubuque, Iowa,Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co..score: 15.0
  7. John Armitage Staunton (1937). Scholasticism. [Garrison, N.Y..score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Joseph Watzlawik (1966). Leo Xiii and the New Scholasticism. Cebu City, Philippines, University of San Carlos; [Foreign Distribution by Cellar Book Shop, Detroit.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John S. Zybura (1926). Present-Day Thinkers and the New Scholasticism. And London, B. Herder Book Co..score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. I. Taavitsainen & P. Pahta (1998). Vernacularisation of Medical Writing in English: A Corpus-Based Study of Scholasticism. Early Science and Medicine 3 (2):157-185.score: 12.0
    This article proposes a model for linguistic analysis of scientific thought-styles, combining quantitative and qualitative analyses in the variationist frame and focusing on writings of the scholastic period. The first part of the article considers factors that led to the vernacularisation of scientific writings in fifteenth-century England and the sources, underlying traditions and audiences of these writings. The empirical part focuses on two features typical of scholasticism: references to authorities and the use of prescriptive phrases. The results show statistical (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Daniel D. Novotný (2009). In Defense of Baroque Scholasticism. Studia Neoaristotelica 6 (2):209-233.score: 12.0
    Defensio Scholasticae BarocaeFranciscus Suarez (1548–1617) communiter fere ad hoc tempus “ultimus Medii Aevi philosophus”, qui praeclarae scholasticae traditioni finem posuerit, esse visus est. Huius tractationis thesis autem est, eum re vera cultum mirum disciplinarum et artium philosophicarum non sane terminavisse, sed magis incepisse. Cultum hunc, qui saeculo decimo septimo duodevicesimique principio florebat, “Scholasticam Barocam” optime appelandum esse arguitur. Deinde quaeritur, qua re de huius cultus investigatione hodierna philosophiae historia lingua Anglica scripta nihil curat, causae quaedam huius negligentiae indicantur, ad maiorem (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Joseph A. Giacalone (1970). Scholasticism and Welfare Economics. New Scholasticism 44 (2):312-314.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Artur Landgraf (1939). The First Sentence Commentary of Early Scholasticism. New Scholasticism 13 (2):101-132.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Albert William Levi (1934). Scholasticism and the Kantian Aesthetic. New Scholasticism 8 (3):199-222.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Rudolf Allers (1941). Scholasticism and Politics. New Scholasticism 15 (2):189-189.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Sister Patricia José Crowley (1954). Burke and Scholasticism. New Scholasticism 28 (2):170-186.score: 12.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. P. S. Moore (1929). Progressive Scholasticism. New Scholasticism 3 (2):199-202.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John O. Riedl (1936). Maimonides and Scholasticism. New Scholasticism 10 (1):18-29.score: 12.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Fulton J. Sheen (1929). New Physics and New Scholasticism. New Scholasticism 3 (3):241-252.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Francis Siegfried (1927). Present Day Thinkers and the New Scholasticism. New Scholasticism 1 (1):85-88.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Anthony Chemero & Michael Silberstein (2008). After the Philosophy of Mind: Replacing Scholasticism with Science. Philosophy of Science 75 (1):1-27.score: 9.0
  22. Tony Chemero & Michael Silberstein (2008). After the Philosophy of Mind: Replacing Scholasticism with Science. Philosophy of Science 75 (1):1-27.score: 9.0
    We provide a taxonomy of the two most important debates in the philosophy of the cognitive and neural sciences. The first debate is over methodological individualism: is the object of the cognitive and neural sciences the brain, the whole animal, or the animal--environment system? The second is over explanatory style: should explanation in cognitive and neural science be reductionist-mechanistic, inter-level mechanistic, or dynamical? After setting out the debates, we discuss the ways in which they are interconnected. Finally, we make some (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Helen S. Lang (2008). Aristotle on Memory and Recollection. Text, Translation, Interpretation, and Reception in Western Scholasticism. [REVIEW] International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (2):216-218.score: 9.0
  24. David Bloch (2007). Aristotle on Memory and Recollection: Text, Translation, Interpretation, and Reception in Western Scholasticism. Brill.score: 9.0
    Based on a new critical edition of Aristotle's "De Memoria" and two interpretive essays, this book challenges current views on Aristotle's theories of memory ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Dominik Perler (1996). Leen Spruit, Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge, Vol. I: Classical Roots and Medieval Discussions, Vol. II: Renaissance Controversies, Later Scholasticism, and the Elimination of the Intelligible Species in Modern Philosophy. E.J. Brill, Leiden-New York-Köln 1994 and 1995, 452 P. And 590 P. ISBN 90-04-0988-3-6/90-04-10396-1. (Brill's Studies in Intellectual History, 48 and 49). [REVIEW] Vivarium 34 (2):280-283.score: 9.0
  26. John Platt (1982). Reformed Thought and Scholasticism: The Arguments for the Existence of God in Dutch Theology, 1575-1650. E.J. Brill.score: 9.0
    CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION This investigation seeks to make a modest contribution to the debate on the changes which took place in Reformed theology in the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Steven Marrone (2009). Magic and the Physical World in Thirteenth-Century Scholasticism. Early Science and Medicine 14 (1):158-185.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Rory Fox (2009). Francisco Suarez, On Real Relation (Disputatio Metaphysicae XLVII) A Translation From the Latin, Edited with an Introduction and Notes by John P. Doyle�Suarez: Between Scholasticism and Modernity (Marquette Studies in Philosophy 52). By Jose Pereira. Heythrop Journal 50 (2):322-323.score: 9.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. L. Grodecki (1953). Reviews : Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism. By Erwin Panofsky. Latrobe, Penna.: The Archabbey Press, I95i. I9.5xi4 Cm. Pp. XVIII+I56. Illustrated. [REVIEW] Diogenes 1 (1):135-137.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. James Apple (2003). Twenty Varieties of the Samgha: A Typology of Noble Beings (ĀRya) in Indo-Tibetan Scholasticism (Part I). [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 31 (5/6):503-592.score: 9.0
  31. Horace Craig Longwell (1928). The Significance of Scholasticism. Philosophical Review 37 (3):210-225.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. S. Todd Lowry (2001). The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought: Antecedents of Choice and Power, Odd Langholm. Cambridge University Press, 1998, IX + 215 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):121-145.score: 9.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. James Apple (2004). Twenty Varieties of the Samgha: A Typology of Noble Beings (Ārya) in Indo-Tibetan Scholasticism (Part II) An Assembly of Irreversible Bodhisattvas. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 32 (2/3):211-279.score: 9.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. John Haldane (1993). Editorial Introduction: Scholasticism--Old and New. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (173):403-411.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Peter King (2008). The Inner Cathedral: Mental Architecture in High Scholasticism. Vivarium 46 (3):253-274.score: 9.0
    Mediaeval psychological theory was a “faculty psychology”: a confederation of semiautonomous sub-personal agents, the interaction of which constitutes our psychological experience. One such faculty was intellective appetite, that is, the will. On what grounds was the will taken to be a distinct faculty? After a brief survey of Aristotle's criteria for identifying and distinguishing mental faculties, I look in some detail at the mainstream mediaeval view, given clear expression by Thomas Aquinas, and then at the dissenting views of John Duns (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Jacques Maritain, Art and Scholasticism.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Daniel Dominik Novotný (2006). Prolegomena to a Study of Beings of Reason in Post-Suarezian Scholasticism, 1600–1650. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (2):117-141.score: 9.0
    In 1597 Francisco Suárez published a comprehensive treatise on beings of reason (entia rationis) as part of his Disputationes metaphysicae. Subsequent scholastic philosophers vigorously debated various aspects of Suárez’s theory. The aim of this paper is to identify some of the most controversial points of these debates, as they developed in the first half of the seventeenth century. In particular, I focus on the intension and the extension of ‘ens rationis’, its division (into negations, privations and relations of reason) and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Edward A. Synan (1983). The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism 1100–1600 Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny, and Jan Pinborg, Editors; Eleonore Stump, Associate Editor Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Pp. Xiv, 1035. $74.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 22 (04):741-743.score: 9.0
  39. Joseph William Browne (1972). Berkeley and Scholasticism. The Modern Schoolman 49 (2):113-123.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Felix Hope (1936). Scholasticism. Philosophy 11 (44):445 - 465.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Michael McGuckian (2009). Personalism and Scholasticism. By John Cowburn, S.J., The Worldview of Personalism: Origins and Early Development. By Jan Olof Bengtsson and Subversive Orthodoxy: Outlaws, Revolutionaries, and Other Christians in Disguise. By Robert Inchausti. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 50 (4):735-736.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. R. Panikkar (1973). Common Patterns of Eastern and Western Scholasticism. Diogenes 21 (83):103-113.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Francis Winterton (1888). The Lesson of Neo-Scholasticism. Mind 13 (51):383-404.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Frederick C. Copleston (1984). The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny, Jan Pinborg(Edd.), Eleonore Stump (Ass. Ed.): The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100–1600. Pp. Xiv + 1035. Cambridge University Press, 1982. £40. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 34 (02):223-224.score: 9.0
  45. Richard Cross (1995). Individuation in Scholasticism. International Philosophical Quarterly 35 (3):349-351.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peter S. Dillard (2008). Heidegger and Philosophical Atheology: A Neo-Scholastic Critique. Continuum.score: 9.0
    Introduction -- Early Heidegger and scholasticism -- Heidegger's atheology of appropriation -- Heideggerian atheology and the Scotist causal argument -- Appropriation and the problem of sufficient comprehension -- Heidegger's atheology of nothingness -- Nothingness and the problem of possibility -- A positive application.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Leslie J. Walker (1929). Present-Day Thinkers and the New Scholasticism—An International Symposium. Edited and Augmented by John S. Zybura Ph.D., (St. Louis, U.S.A., and London: B. Herder Book Co.1926. Pp. Xviii + 543. Price 12s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 4 (13):136-.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Edward C. Moore (1953). Professor Bastian's Comments on Peirce's Scholasticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (2):250-251.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Daniel Novotny (2013). Ens Rationis From Suárez to Caramuel: A Study in Scholasticism of the Baroque Era. Fordham University Press.score: 9.0
    In this groundbreaking book, Daniel D. Novotny explores one of the most controversial topics of Suarez's philosophy: "beings of reason." Beings of reason are impossible intentional objects, such as blindness and square-circle.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000