Search results for 'Science Methodology' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Patrick Suppes, International Union of the History and Philosophy of Science & Academia Republicii Socialiste România (1973). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Proceedings. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Ernest Nagel & International Union of the History and Philosophy of Science (1962). Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science Proceedings. Stanford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Azari͡a Prizenti Polikarov (1983). Methodological Problems of Science: The Iteration Cycle: Science--Methodology of Science. Pub. House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  53
    Wenceslao J. González & Jesus Alcolea (eds.) (2006). Contemporary Perspectives in Philosophy and Methodology of Science. Netbiblo.
    Novelty and Continuity in Philosophy and Methodology of Science Wenceslao J. Gonzalez Nowadays, philosophy and methodology of science appear as a ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  14
    Joachim Stolz (1996). Bericht: 10th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (August 19–25, 1995; Florence, Italy). [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 27 (1):167-170.
    The International Union of History and Philosophy of Science organizing the 10th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science is at its cross-road: the alternative is mass-performance or creative exchange of ideas. The program is criticized because the thematic center in History and Philosophy of Science has been shifted too far into the realm of micro-fields of Logic and the time reduction for presentation and discussion of papers to 20 minutes should be reconsidered. Several (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Vadim V. Vasilyev (2013). Hume's Methodology and the Science of Human Nature. History of Philosophy Yearbook 2012:62-115.
    In this paper I try to explain a strange omission in Hume’s methodological descriptions in his first Enquiry. In the course of this explanation I reveal a kind of rationalistic tendency of the latter work. It seems to contrast with “experimental method” of his early Treatise of Human Nature, but, as I show that there is no discrepancy between the actual methods of both works, I make an attempt to explain the change in Hume’s characterization of his own methods. (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  67
    Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe & Erik Steen Kristensen (2002). Towards a Systemic Research Methodology in Agriculture: Rethinking the Role of Values in Science. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 19 (1):3-23.
    The recent drastic developmentof agriculture, together with the growingsocietal interest in agricultural practices andtheir consequences, pose a challenge toagricultural science. There is a need forrethinking the general methodology ofagricultural research. This paper takes somesteps towards developing a systemic researchmethodology that can meet this challenge – ageneral self-reflexive methodology that forms abasis for doing holistic or (with a betterterm) wholeness-oriented research and providesappropriate criteria of scientific quality.From a philosophy of research perspective,science is seen as an interactive learningprocess (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  8. Patrick Suppes (1969). Studies in the Methodology and Foundations of Science. Dordrecht, D. Reidel.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   29 citations  
  9.  12
    Leon Chwistek (1948). The Limits of Science: Outline of Logic and of the Methodology of the Exact Sciences. Harcourt, Brace.
    AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO ENGLISH EDITION The English edition of Granice Nauki is essentially different from the original text. Chapter VII is completely changed. ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10. B. van Rootselaar & Frits Staal (eds.) (1968). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Iii. Amsterdam, North-Holland Pub. Co..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  2
    Scott Churchill (1986). Extensions in Human Science Methodology. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 6 (2):132-132.
    This article provides a brief review of Saybrook Review, Vol 6, No. 1, Spring 1986. Special issue: Extensions in Human Science Methodology guest edited by Donald E. Polkinghorne. This issue contains articles written by four of the faculty of the Saybrook Institute, all of which examine "the consequences of extending the criteria of science beyond the traditional objectivism-relativism dichotomy." Polkinghorne's lead article is a compelling and clear historical characterization of the place of human science in today's (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Yehoshua Bar-Hillel & Universitah Ha- Ivrit Bi-Yerushalayim (1965). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress. Edited by Yehoshua Bar-Hillel. North-Holland Pub. Co.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Eva Álvarez, Roger Bosch & Lorena Villamil (eds.) (2003). Volume of Abstracts: 12th International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Oviedo, August 7-13, 2003. [REVIEW] Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad de Oviedo.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (ed.) (2002). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science at Warsaw University: Studies and Contributions to the 11th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Kraków (Cracow) August 20-26, 1999. [REVIEW] Wydawn. Nauk. Semper.
  15.  18
    James R. Wible (1998). The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology as If Economics Really Mattered. Routledge.
    This book explores aspects of science from an economic point of view. The author begins with economic models of misconduct in science, moving on to discuss other important issues, including market failure and the market place of ideas.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  16.  18
    Patrick Suppes (ed.) (1973). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. New York,American Elsevier Pub. Co..
    ELEMENTARY LOGIC GR. C. MOISIL Institute of Mathematics, Rumanian Academy, Bucharest, Rumania 1. We shall consider a typified logic of propositions. ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  17.  2
    Ernest Nagel (ed.) (1962). Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Stanford, Calif.,Stanford University Press.
  18. L. Jonathan Cohen (ed.) (1982). Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science Vi: Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Hannover, 1979. Sole Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Elsevier North-Holland.
  19. Peter Gärdenfors, Jan Wole Nski & Katarzyna Kijania-Placek (2002). In the Scope of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  63
    James Justus (2012). Carnap on Concept Determination: Methodology for Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW] European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (2):161-179.
    Abstract Recent criticisms of intuition from experimental philosophy and elsewhere have helped undermine the authority of traditional conceptual analysis. As the product of more empirically informed philosophical methodology, this result is compelling and philosophically salutary. But the negative critiques rarely suggest a positive alternative. In particular, a normative account of concept determination—how concepts should be characterized—is strikingly absent from such work. Carnap's underappreciated theory of explication provides such a theory. Analyses of complex concepts in empirical sciences illustrates and supports (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  21.  72
    Sandra G. Harding & Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.) (2003). Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    This collection of essays, first published two decades ago, presents central feminist critiques and analyses of natural and social sciences and their philosophies. Unfortunately, in spite of the brilliant body of research and scholarship in these fields in subsequent decades, the insights of these essays remain as timely now as they were then: philosophy and the sciences still presume kinds of social innocence to which they are not entitled. The essays focus on Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Hobbes, Rousseau, and Marx; on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  22. Yehoshua Bar-Hillel (ed.) (1965). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam, North-Holland Pub. Co..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  23.  17
    Desh Raj Sirswal, The Problem of Mind, Cognitive Science and Integrated Research Methodology.
    There are numerous aspects of the nature of man, and each aspect gives rise to many problems. Some of these problems are comparatively simple, other deep and perplexing. Throughout time, people have made distinction between the material or physical world and mental or psychical world, the former may be perceived by any observer; the later remains a private experience. Philosophy of mind, today dealing with four issues: the nature of mind and body, mental content, mental causation and consciousness. The nature (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. F. Hindriks (2001). British Classical Economists and Their Methodological Heritage A Review of Deborah A. Redman's The Rise of Political Economy as a Science. Methodology and the Classical Economists. [REVIEW] Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1):145-152.
  25.  20
    Roger Backhouse (ed.) (1998). Explorations in Economic Methodology: From Lakatos to Empirical Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
    Is methodology fruitless? Intense controversy has resulted from attempts to understand economics through philosophy of science. This collection clarifies and responds to the issues raised, arguing that methodology is an essential activity.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  9
    Clark L. Hull (1944). Value, Valuation, and Natural-Science Methodology. Philosophy of Science 11 (3):125-141.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  6
    Dimíter Ginev (1986). The “ScienceMethodology” Iterative Cycle. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):143-153.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. C. Andreou (1998). James R. Wible, The Economics of Science: Methodology and Epistemology as If Economics Really Mattered. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):281.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Robert E. Butts, Jaakko Hintikka & Methodology Philosophy of Science International Congress of Logic (1977). Basic Problems in Methodology and Linguistics Part Three of the Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, London, Ontario, Canada, 1975.
  30. Ch'en Ch'ang-shu (1974). The Significance of Natural Science Methodology Research. Contemporary Chinese Thought 5 (3):69-90.
    Investigating the methods of natural science research is one of the important topics of the dialectics of nature.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Methodology and Philosophy of Science International Congress for Logic, B. van Rootselaar & J. F. Staal (1968). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Iii Proceedings of the Third International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam 1967; Edited by B. Van Rootselaar and J.F. Staal. [REVIEW] North-Holland Pub. Co.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  5
    Ruth Barcan Marcus, Georg Dorn & Paul Weingartner (eds.) (1986). Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Vii: Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Salzburg, 1983. Sole Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
    Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VII.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. C. Pühringer, Paul Weingartner & Methodology and Philosophy of Science International Congress of Logic (1984). Philosophy of Science, History of Science a Selection of Contributed Papers of the 7th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Salzburg, 1983. A. Hain.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  12
    Dag Prawitz, Brian Skyrms & Dag Westerståhl (eds.) (1994). Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science Ix: Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Uppsala, Sweden, August 7-14, 1991. [REVIEW] Elsevier.
    This volume is the product of the Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science and contains the text of most of ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Till Düppe (2011). How Economic Methodology Became a Separate Science. Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (2):163-176.
    Ever since the formation of the field of economic methodology in the 1990s, doubts have been raised about its discursive closure from both inside and outside the field. Rather than embarking on a programmatic discussion, I present a historical narrative regarding the conditions of the formation of the field, which may have necessitated this closure. These conditions are found in the role methodological reflections played in the formalist revolution of the 1950s and in its critique in the 1970s. Both (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  2
    Miguel Alvarado (2015). Literature, epistemology and social science methodology. Cinta de Moebio 54:250-265.
    This article discusses the cultural understanding of the fantastic from Julio Cortazar’s work, expressed particularly in their metalinguistic texts, as a Latin American way of assuming "the real", which can project the fundamentals of Cortazar's work to the humanities and especially to ethnology. En este artículo se reflexiona sobre la comprensión transcultural y el tema de lo fantástico, ello desde el examen de la obra de Julio Cortázar, expresada particularmente en sus textos metalingüísticos, como un modo latinoamericano y de la (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. J. Earman (1993). Carnap, Kuhn, and the Philosophy of Science Methodology. In Paul Horwich (ed.), World Changes. MIT Press 9--36.
  38.  8
    Harold W. Baillie (1999). Redman, Deborah A. The Rise of Political Economy as a Science: Methodology and the Classical Economists. Review of Metaphysics 53 (1):195-196.
  39.  24
    Giambattista Formica (2010). Von Neumann's Methodology of Science: From Incompleteness Theorems to Later Foundational Reflections. Perspectives on Science 18 (4):480-499.
    Describing the methodology of a prominent mathematician can be an over-ambitious task, especially if the mathematician in question has made crucial contributions to almost the whole of mathematical science. John von Neumann’s case study falls within this category. Nonetheless, we can still provide a clear picture of von Neumann’s methodology of science. Recent literature has clarified its key feature—the opportunistic approach to axiomatics—and has laid out its main principles. To be honest, this work can hardly be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  17
    Elvio Baccarini (1992). Reflective Equilibrium and Methodology of Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):175 – 180.
    Abstract In The Rational and the Social James Brown argues against the use of the method of reflective equilibrium in attempting to justify methodological norms. For, according to Brown, this would involve a circularity for that method presupposes an account of good scientific practice. In this paper it is argued that the method can be sustained without such a presupposition using either conherentism, reliabilism or defeasible foundationalism. That being so there is no circularity in applying it within normative methodology (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  8
    Ivan A. Boldyrev (2012). Philosophy of Science or Science and Technology Studies? Economic Methodology and Auction Theory. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (3):289-307.
    This article addresses some recent tendencies in economic methodology defined as a philosophy of science for economics. I review the problem of normative/positive distinction in methodology and argue that normativity in its past forms is intolerable today but is, at the same time, indispensable for methodological inquiry. Using recent texts by Mirowski and Nik-Khah and by Alexandrova and Northcott on the applications of auction theory as a case study, I compare in more detail various approaches to economic (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  4
    Noretta Koertge (1980). Methodology, Ideology and Feminist Critiques of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:346 - 359.
    This paper deals with two questions. First, if all scientists were perfect Popperians, how much influence could their background values and experiences have? It is argued that background can play a role in problem choice and in the constructing and testing of hypotheses. Second, do the ideals of feminism suggest the need for a new methodology and epistemology for science? In answering this question, Harding's paper in this volume is discussed.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. William E. Carlo (1967). Metaphysics, Problematic or Science: Methodology Vs. Method. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 41:134.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. David N. Gibbs (2013). Researching Parapolitics: Replication, Qualitative Research, and Social Science Methodology. In Eric Michael Wilson (ed.), The Dual State: Parapolitics, Carl Schmitt and the National Security Complex. Ashgate
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Joseph Mayer (1936). Social Science Methodology. Journal of Social Philosophy 1 (4):364.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. John Vickers (2002). Reflection Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 93:350-350.
    This fine book is a comprehensive and careful survey of the current situation in the methodology of economics. It is directed primarily at economists and students of economics. Indeed, the economist who reads it with the care it deserves will have a better grip on matters of methodology in economics than most philosophers of science, but philosophers and historians of science will also find the work rewarding and interesting. Though a few examples may be beyond the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  9
    Nader Chokr (1986). Prescription Versus Description in Philosophy of Science, or Methodology Versus History: A Critical Assessment. Metaphilosophy 17 (4):289-299.
    This paper examines critically the current state of affairs in philosophy of science. It focuses on the well-Known puzzle about the relationship between the normative prescriptive methodology of science and positive descriptive history of science. This puzzle has dogged philosophers of science for over a generation and is still controversial. My conclusion is that there is really no escape from it. The best way to characterize it is as follows: "philosophy of science without history (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48.  3
    J. M. Gvishiani (1989). Impact of Global Modelling on Modern Methodology of Science. In Jens Erik Fenstad, Ivan Timofeevich Frolov & Risto Hilpinen (eds.), Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science Viii: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Moscow, 1987. Sole Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Elsevier Science
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  1
    Adolfo Eslava (2014). Qualitative and quantitative analysis for political studies: Trilateral science, experimental methodology and grounded theory. Cinta de Moebio 51:111-126.
    The paper discuss the application of qualitative and quantitative techniques in political studies. It describes the classical proposal of Johan Galtung, known as trilateral science, which invites to the permanent contrast to confirm, validate and accept facts and ideas; then it explores Grounded Theory as a mechanism to achieve and explore data in order to identify a possible dialogue with experimental methodology. Finally, it shows social capital as a case study to demonstrate the relevance of multi-methodological applications. El (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  2
    Jerzy Kmita (1974). The Methodology of Science As A Theoretical Discipline. Russian Studies in Philosophy 12 (4):38-51.
    By now many formulations have been proposed to provide a definition of the realm of research topics in the methodology of science, which is sometimes also called, in the tradition of Anglo-Saxon terminology, the philosophy of science. There are various situations in which fundamental discrepancies exist among some of these formulations. Without resorting in this article to citation and detailed analysis of such definitions, let us emphasize from the outset that one of the principal sources of significant (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000