8 found
Sort by:
  1. Scott O. Lilienfeld & Robert D. Latzman (2014). Threat Bias, Not Negativity Bias, Underpins Differences in Political Ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):318-319.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Lori Marino, Randy Malamud, Ron Broglio, Scott O. Lilienfeld & Nathan Nobis (2011). Strong Claims, Feeble Evidence: A Rejoinder to Falk Et Al. (2010). Society and Animals 19 (3):291-293.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Randy Malamud, Lori Marino, Nathan Nobis, Ron Broglio & Scott O. Lilienfeld (2010). Do Zoos and Aquariums Promote Attitude Change in Visitors? A Critical Evaluation of the American Zoo and Aquarium Study. Society and Animals 18 (2):126-138.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Lori Marino, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Randy Malamud, Nathan Nobis & Ron Broglio (2010). Do Zoos and Aquariums Promote Attitude Change in Visitors? A Critical Evaluation of the American Zoo and Aquarium Study. Society and Animals 18 (2):126-138.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Dennis E. Reidy, Amos Zeichner, Kallio Hunnicutt-Ferguson & Scott O. Lilienfeld (2008). Psychopathy Traits and the Processing of Emotion Words: Results of a Lexical Decision Task. Cognition and Emotion 22 (6):1174-1186.
  6. Scott O. Lilienfeld (2007). The Assault on Scientific Mental Health. In Paul Kurtz & David R. Koepsell (eds.), Science and Ethics: Can Science Help Us Make Wise Moral Judgments? Prometheus Books. 208.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Steven Jay Lynn, Irving Kirsch, Josh Knox, Oliver Fassler & Scott O. Lilienfeld (2007). Hypnosis and Neuroscience: Implications for the Altered State Debate. In Graham A. Jamieson (ed.), Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Oxford University Press. 145-165.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Scott O. Lilienfeld (2006). The Heuristic Value of Controversy in Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):580-581.
    Ceci et al.'s (2006) findings remind us that tenure rarely serves its intended purpose. I argue that tenure often fails in part because many faculty members possess an insufficient appreciation for the heuristic value of controversy in science and other disciplines. Using two case examples from clinical/personality psychology, I show how controversial positions can draw sharp criticism while facilitating scientific progress. (Published Online February 8 2007).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation