Search results for 'Scott Taylor' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. F. E. Fox, G. J. Taylor, M. F. Harris, K. J. Rodham, J. Sutton, J. Scott & B. Robinson (2009). "It's Crucial They're Treated as Patients": Ethical Guidance and Empirical Evidence Regarding Treating Doctor-Patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (1):7-11.score: 2400.0
    Ethical guidance from the British Medical Association (BMA) about treating doctor–patients is compared and contrasted with evidence from a qualitative study of general practitioners (GPs) who have been patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 GPs who had experienced a significant illness. Their experiences were discussed and issues about both being and treating doctor–patients were revealed. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to evaluate the data. In this article data extracts are used to illustrate and discuss three key points that summarise (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John Edgar, W. R. Scott, J. C. Irvine, C. D. Broad, B. B., G. A. Johnston, Arthur Robinson, T. E., H. Butler Smith, C. M. Gillespie, H. J. W. Hetherington, A. E. Taylor & D. S. Margoliouth (1914). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 23 (91):433-460.score: 2400.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Christopher J. May, Jeffrey C. Schank, Sanjay Joshi, Jonathan Tran, R. J. Taylor & I.-Esha Scott (2006). Rat Pups and Random Robots Generate Similar Self-Organized and Intentional Behavior. Complexity 12 (1):53-66.score: 2400.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. J. Scott, K. Rodham, G. Taylor & J. Turner-Cobb (2008). 'You Can't Stop Undergraduates Asking Silly Questions': Academics' Views on Submission of Undergraduate Student Projects for Ethical Review. Research Ethics 4 (4):147-151.score: 2400.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Thomas N. Taylor & Andrew C. Scott (1983). Interactions of Plants and Animals During the Carboniferous. BioScience 33 (8):488.score: 2400.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Scott Seider & Jason Taylor (2011). Broadening College Student Interest in Philosophical Education Through Community Service Learning. Teaching Philosophy 34 (3):197-217.score: 300.0
    The Pulse Program at Boston College is a community service learning program that combines academic study of philosophy and theology with a year-long community service project. An analysis of the Pulse Pro­gram during the 2008–09 academic year revealed that participating students demonstrated a significant increase in their interest in philosophy; a greater likelihood of enrolling in additional philosophy coursework; and a deeper interest in philosophy than classmates not participating in service-learning. Interviews with participating students revealed that the Pulse Program highlighted (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ann Cavoukian, Scott Taylor & Martin E. Abrams (2010). Privacy by Design: Essential for Organizational Accountability and Strong Business Practices. [REVIEW] Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):405-413.score: 240.0
    An accountability-based privacy governance model is one where organizations are charged with societal objectives, such as using personal information in a manner that maintains individual autonomy and which protects individuals from social, financial and physical harms, while leaving the actual mechanisms for achieving those objectives to the organization. This paper discusses the essential elements of accountability identified by the Galway Accountability Project, with scholarship from the Centre for Information Policy Leadership at Hunton & Williams LLP. Conceptual Privacy by Design principles (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. by Scott A. Anderson, Jeremy D. Bendik‐Keymer, Samuel Black, Chad M. Cyrenne, Bart Gruzalski, Mark P. Jenkins, John Morrow, Michael A. Neblo, Tommie Shelby & James Stacey Taylor (2002). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Ethics 112 (2):421-427.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. R. Taylor Scott (1993). William H. Poteat. Tradition and Discovery 20 (1):6-12.score: 240.0
    William H. Poteat’s thought, while indebted to Michael Polanyi, originates in Poteat’s own project of remembering all articulate significances to their pre-articulate grounding in the mindbody. He invented the term mindbody both to overstep the traditional distinction between mind and body and to name the living arche of all meaning and meaning-discernment. In focusing on the recovery of the mindbody as the bedrock ontological matrix for the aquisition of speech, the act of explicit reference par excellence, Poteat radicalizes and advances (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Richard S. Calef, Ronald A. Metz, Tamara L. Atkinson, Ruth C. Pellerzi, Kathryn S. Taylor & E. Scott Geller (1984). Acquisition of Running in the Straight Alley Following Experience with Response-Independent Food. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (1):67-69.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Scott Davidson, John E. Drabinski, Michelle Huynh, Kris Sealey, Amina Taylor, Vanessa Gabler & Kari Johnston (2010). MS Collection# 118-1940-1988. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 3 (3).score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Scott Davidson, John E. Drabinski, Michelle Huynh, Kris Sealey, Amina Taylor, Vanessa Gabler & Kari Johnston (2010). Supplement to the Paul Ricoeur Collection. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 3 (3).score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. David McPherson & Charles Taylor (2012). Re-Enchanting the World: An Interview with Charles Taylor. Philosophy and Theology 24 (2):275-294.score: 210.0
    This interview with Charles Taylor explores a central concern throughout his work, viz., his concern to confront the challenges presented by the process of ‘disenchantment’ in the modern world. It focuses especially on what is involved in seeking a kind of ‘re-enchantment.' A key issue that is discussed is the relationship of Taylor’s theism to his effort of seeking re-enchantment. Some other related issues that are explored pertain to questions surrounding Taylor’s argument against the standard secularization thesis (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Dominic Scott (1999). Aristotle on Well-Being and Intellectual Contemplation: Dominic Scott. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):225–242.score: 210.0
    [David Charles] Aristotle, it appears, sometimes identifies well-being (eudaimonia) with one activity (intellectual contemplation), sometimes with several, including ethical virtue. I argue that this appearance is misleading. In the Nicomachean Ethics, intellectual contemplation is the central case of human well-being, but is not identical with it. Ethically virtuous activity is included in human well-being because it is an analogue of intellectual contemplation. This structure allows Aristotle to hold that while ethically virtuous activity is valuable in its own right, the best (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Charles Taylor (2004). Charles Taylor. Ethics 112 (1).score: 210.0
    Charles Taylor is one of the most distinctive figures in the landscape of contemporary philosophy. His ability to contribute to philosophical conversations across a wide spectrum of ideas is especially impressive in a time of increasing specialization. These areas include moral theory, theories of subjectivity, political theory, epistemology, hermeneutics, philosophy of mind, philosophy of language and aesthetics. Most recently, Taylor has branched into the study of religion. Written by a team of international authorities, this collection will be read (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Charles Taylor, James Tully & Daniel M. Weinstock (eds.) (1994). Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question. Cambridge University Press.score: 210.0
    This is the first comprehensive evaluation of Charles Taylor's work and a major contribution to leading questions in philosophy and the human sciences as they face an increasingly pluralistic age. Charles Taylor is one of the most influential contemporary moral and political philosophers: in an era of specialisation he is one of the few thinkers who has developed a comprehensive philosophy which speaks to the conditions of the modern world in a way that is compelling to specialists in (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Thomas Taylor (1969). Thomas Taylor the Platonist: Selected Writings. London, Routledge & K. Paul.score: 210.0
    Thomas Taylor in England, by K. Raine.--Thomas Taylor in America, by G. M. Harper.--Biographical accounts of Thomas Taylor.--Concerning the beautiful.--The hymns of Orpheus.--Concerning the cave of the nymphs.--A dissertation on the Eleusinian and Bacchic mysteries.--Introduction to The fable of Cupid and Psyche.--The Platonic philosopher's creed.--An apology for the fables of Homer.--Bibliography (p. [521]-538).
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Alex Klaushofer & Charles Taylor (2000). Taylor-Made Selves. The Philosophers' Magazine 12 (12):37-40.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. C. Taylor, F. A. Carnevale & D. M. Weinstock (2011). Toward a Hermeneutical Conception of Medicine: A Conversation with Charles Taylor. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):436-445.score: 180.0
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. A. E. Taylor (1929). Professor Taylor's Reply. Philosophy 4 (15):433-.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. C. S. Taylor (1980). Reviews : Charles S. Taylor -- Paulo Freire's Pedagogu in Guinea-Bissau. Philosophy and Social Criticism 7 (2):216-225.score: 180.0
  22. Kathryn P. Scott & Deborah Martin Floyd (1991). Floyd and Scott, From Page 13. Inquiry 8 (4):26-26.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. William T. Scott (1981). Report From Bill Scott On Polanyi Biography. Tradition and Discovery 8 (2):2-3.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Mary Scott (1996). Scott Adams. Business Ethics 10 (4):26-29.score: 180.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Drusilla Scott (1986). Scott Replies to Harker Letter. Tradition and Discovery 14 (2):25-26.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. C. B. Cohen, S. E. Wheeler & D. A. Scott (2000). Prayer is Therapy-Cynthia B. Cohen, Sondra E. Wheeler, and David A. Scott Reply. Hastings Center Report 30 (6):5-5.score: 180.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Joan Wallach Scott (1995). A Response to Joan Wallach Scott. In Jeffrey Williams (ed.), Pc Wars: Politics and Theory in the Academy. Routledge.score: 180.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. L. J. Taylor & S. Lev Ari (2009). Action in Cognition: The Case of Language. Language and Cognition, 1, 45-58. Taylor, LJ & Zwaan, RA (2008). Motor Resonance and Linguistic. [REVIEW] Cognition 115:39-45.score: 180.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Gwen Taylor, Ismay Barwell & R. G. Durrant (eds.) (1982). Essays in Honour of Gwen Taylor ; [Contributors, Ismay Barwell ... Et Al.]. Philosophy Dept., University of Otago.score: 180.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Richard Taylor (1989). Reflective Wisdom: Richard Taylor on Issues That Matter. Prometheus Books.score: 180.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Charles Taylor (1985). Self-Interpreting Animals. 45-76 In: TAYLOR, Charles: Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers 1.score: 180.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Charles Taylor (1980). Taylor's Comments. Rorty, Taylor, and Dreyfus: A Discussion. Review of Metaphysics 34 (1):47-55.score: 180.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. L. R. Taylor (1971). The Doomsday Book. By Gordon Rattray Taylor. Pp. 335. (Thames & Hudson, 1970.) Price £2·10. [REVIEW] Journal of Biosocial Science 3 (2):239-241.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Gerard McGill (2008). Prophetic & Public: The Social Witness of U.S. Catholicism. By Kristin E. Heyerhandbook of Bioethics and Religion. By David E. Guinn, Ed.Future Perfect? God, Medicine and Human Dignity. By Celia Deane-Drummond and Peter Manley Scott, Eds.Health and Human Flourishing: Religion, Medicine, and Moral Anthropology. By Carol R. Taylor and Roberto Dell'Oro, Eds. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 49 (3):501–507.score: 120.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Scott Schaffer (2012). Cosmopolitan Claims Making, Interculturalism, and the Bouchard-Taylor Report. In Will Kymlicka & Kathryn Walker (eds.), Rooted Cosmopolitanism: Canada and the World. University of British Columbia Press. 129.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Matthew Walhout (2010). Looking to Charles Taylor and Joseph Rouse for Best Practices in Science and Religion. Zygon 45 (3):558-574.score: 24.0
    People discussing science and religion usually frame their conversations in terms of essentialist assumptions about science, assumptions requiring the existence (but not the specification) of criteria according to which science can be distinguished from other forms of inquiry. However, criteria functioning at a level of generality appropriate to such discussions may not exist at all. Essentialist assumptions may be avoided if science is understood within a broader context of human practices. In a philosophy of practices, to label a practice as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Ruth Abbey (2002). Pluralism in Practice: The Political Thought of Charles Taylor. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):98-123.score: 24.0
    This review article outlines some of the major contributions made to political theory by Charles Taylor. It focuses on his relationship to liberalism, his contribution to the understanding of democracy and his analysis of the politics of recognition. Several lines of critique of Taylor's thought on these issues are also explored. Some reflections on Taylor's style of theorising about politics are offered, and the question of whether he is a conservative or critical theorist is examined.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jukka Varelius (2010). On Taylor's Justification of Medical Informed Consent. Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.score: 24.0
    In contemporary Western biomedical ethics, informed consent practices are commonly justified in terms of the intrinsic value of patient autonomy. James Stacey Taylor maintains that this conception of the moral grounding of medical informed consent is mistaken. On the basis of his reasoning to that effect, Taylor argues that medical informed consent is justified by the instrumental value of personal autonomy. In this article, I examine whether Taylor's justification of medical informed consent is plausible.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Peter Woodford (2012). Specters of the Nineteenth Century: Charles Taylor and the Problem of Historicism. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (1):171-192.score: 24.0
    This paper identifies and analyzes the problem of historicism in Charles Taylor's work overall, but with particular emphasis on his most recent publication, A Secular Age. I circumscribe the problem of historicism through reference to the nineteenth-century German philosophical tradition in which it developed, in particular in the thought of Wilhelm Dilthey. I then trace the structural similarities between the notions of history to be found in the thought of Taylor and Dilthey and how these structural similarities raise (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Alexander C. Karolis (2013). Sense in Competing Narratives of Secularization: Charles Taylor and Jean-Luc Nancy. Sophia 52 (4):673-694.score: 24.0
    In this article, using the recent work by Charles Taylor in A Secular Age as my point of departure, I will argue that Jean-Luc Nancy enables us to think past the competing binary of atheistic and religious experience and allows us to surpass the present narratives of secularism. In A Secular Age, Taylor himself seeks a middle ground between atheism and religion, arguing that it is possible to open ourselves to the cross-pressures of modern existence that find us (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Lucie White (2013). Understanding the Relationship Between Autonomy and Informed Consent: A Response to Taylor. Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (4):483-491.score: 24.0
    Medical ethicists conventionally assume that the requirement to employ informed consent procedures is grounded in autonomy. It seems intuitively plausible that providing information to an agent promotes his autonomy by better allowing him to steer his life. However, James Taylor questions this view, arguing that any notion of autonomy that grounds a requirement to inform agents turns out to be unrealistic and self-defeating. Taylor thus contends that we are mistaken about the real theoretical grounds for informed consent procedures. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Gillman Payette & Peter K. Schotch (forthcoming). Remarks on the Scott–Lindenbaum Theorem. Studia Logica:1-18.score: 24.0
    In the late 1960s and early 1970s, Dana Scott introduced a kind of generalization (or perhaps simplification would be a better description) of the notion of inference, familiar from Gentzen, in which one may consider multiple conclusions rather than single formulas. Scott used this idea to good effect in a number of projects including the axiomatization of many-valued logics (of various kinds) and a reconsideration of the motivation of C.I. Lewis. Since he left the subject it has been (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Charles Blattberg (2006). Modern Social Imaginaries Charles Taylor Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004, 215 Pp., $18.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 45 (01):183-.score: 24.0
    Review of Charles Taylor's book, Modern Social Imaginaries.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Richard Double (1979). Taylor's Refutation of Epiphenomenalism. Journal of Critical Analysis 8 (1):23-28.score: 24.0
    In "metaphysics" richard taylor argues that epiphenomenalism is implausible because it leaves open the possibility that human behavior occurs without the presence of mental events. in my paper i examine the sort of possibility involved and conclude that the logical possibility of "mind-less behavior" which epiphenomenalism must allow is an equal possibility for all competing theories of mind. thus, epiphenomenalism is seen to be no worse off in this respect than other theories and taylor's objection fails.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John Lysaker (2012). Finding My Way Through Moral Space. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):143-154.score: 24.0
    The ongoing task of self-discovery, which I figure as self-finding, following Emerson, is integral to the human condition. While its results are always fragmentary, self-finding also conducts the currents of life in ways that establish conditions for our lives and those of others. This activity is mistakenly constrained by Charles Taylor, who argues that it remains tied to moral space. Charles Scott’s work shows how moral space can be found in a manner that suspends the necessity of moral (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Heike Mildenberger (2010). On Milliken-Taylor Ultrafilters. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (4):381-394.score: 24.0
    We show that there may be a Milliken-Taylor ultrafilter with infinitely many near coherence classes of ultrafilters in its projection to ω, answering a question by López-Abad. We show that k -colored Milliken-Taylor ultrafilters have at least k +1 near coherence classes of ultrafilters in its projection to ω. We show that the Mathias forcing with a Milliken-Taylor ultrafilter destroys all Milliken-Taylor ultrafilters from the ground model.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Anna Wojciechowska (2005). Współpracownicy, współautorzy czy niezależni myśliciele? John Stuart Mill i Harriet Taylor Mill. Filo-Sofija 5 (1(5)):139-158.score: 24.0
    Author: Wojciechowska Anna Title: COLLABORATORS, CO-AUTHORS OR INDEPENDENT THINKERS? JOHN STUART MILL AND HARRIET TAYLOR MILL (Współpracownicy, współmyśliciele czy niezależni myśliciele? John Stuart Mill i Harriet Taylor Mill) Source: Filo-Sofija year: 2005, vol:.5, number: 2005/1, pages: 139-158 Keywords: J.S. MILL, HARRIET TAYLOR (MILL), SOCRATIC DIALOG, COLLABORATORS Discipline: PHILOSOPHY Language: POLISH Document type: ARTICLE Publication order reference (Primary author’s office address): E-mail: www:This article raise almost unnoticed in the literature problem of a creative relation between J.S. Mill and (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Ruth Abbey (2011). Another Philosopher-Citizen : The Political Philosophy of Charles Taylor. In Catherine H. Zuckert (ed.), Political Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: Authors and Arguments. Cambridge University Press.score: 24.0
    This chapter briefly reviews the link between Charles Taylor's life and work. It then discusses his position on the role of science in understanding human behavior. It concludes by considering the relationship between theory and practice in Taylor's thought.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Albrecht Classen (ed.) (2010). Laughter in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times: Epistemology of a Fundamental Human Behavior, its Meaning, and Consequences. Walter de Gruyter.score: 24.0
    Introduction: Laughter as an expression of human nature in the Middle Ages and the early modern period: literary, historical, theological, philosophical, and psychological reflections -- Judith Hagen. Laughter in Procopius's wars -- Livnat Holtzman. "Does God really laugh?": appropriate and inappropriate descriptions of God in Islamic traditionalist theology -- Daniel F. Pigg. Laughter in Beowulf: ambiguity, ambivalence, and group identity formation -- Mark Burde. The parodia sacra problem and medieval comic studies -- Olga V. Trokhimenko. Women's laughter and gender politics (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Javier Gracia Calandin (2009). Legado filosófico en Charles Taylor: ¿Aristóteles, Hegel o Nietzsche? Daimon 46:171-187.score: 24.0
    En este ensayo voy a explorar el legado de Aristóteles, Hegel y Nietzsche en Taylor en relación con su enfoque moderno. Creo que rastrear las huellas de los planteamientos de aquellos filósofos ayuda a entender mejor el enfoque de Taylor y la apropiación moderna que hace de ellos. Una pregunta surge de la búsqueda tras las fuentes filosóficas del enfoque de Taylor: ¿Aristóteles, Hegel o Nietzsche? ¿O quizá ninguno? ¿O tal vez todos un poco? Vamos a ver (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000