PhilPapers is currently in read-only mode while we are performing some maintenance. You can use the site normally except that you cannot sign in. This shouldn't last long.

Search results for 'Self-refutation' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. William Ramsey (1990). Where Does the Self-Refutation Objection Take Us? Inquiry 33 (December):453-65.score: 90.0
    Eliminative materialism is the position that common?sense psychology is false and that beliefs and desires, like witches and demons, do not exist. One of the most popular criticisms of this view is that it is self?refuting or, in some sense, incoherent. Hence, it is often claimed that eliminativism is not only implausible, but necessarily false. Below, I assess the merits of this objection and find it seriously wanting. I argue that the self?refutation objection is (at best) a misleading reformulation of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Victor Reppert (1991). Ramsey on Eliminativism and Self-Refutation. Inquiry 34 (4):499-508.score: 75.0
  3. Barbara Herrnstein Smith (1996). Unloading the Self-Refutation Charge. In Roger T. Ames & Wimal Dissanayake (eds.), Self and Deception: A Cross-Cultural Philosophical Enquiry. Albany: SUNY Press.score: 72.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Luca Castagnoli (2010). Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge University Press.score: 66.0
    Machine generated contents note: Introduction; Part I. Truth, Falsehood and Self-Refutation: 1. Preliminaries; 2. A modern approach: Mackie on the absolute self-refutation of 'nothing is true'; 3. Setting the ancient stage: Dissoi Logoi 4.6; 4. Self-refutation and dialectic: Plato; 5. Speaking to Antiphasis: Aristotle; 6. Introducing peritroph: Sextus Empiricus; 7. Augustine's turn; 8. Interim conclusions; Part II. Pragmatic, Ad Hominem and Operational Self-Refutation: 9. Epicurus against the determinist: blame and reversal; 10. Anti-sceptical dilemmas: pragmatic or (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Nick Trakakis (2006). Nietzsche's Perspectivism and Problems of Self-Refutation. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):91-110.score: 52.0
    Nietzsche’s perspectivism has aroused the perplexity of many a recent commentator, not least because of the doctrine’s apparent self-refuting character. If, as Nietzsche holds, there are no facts but only interpretations, then how are we to understand this claim itself? Nietzsche’s perspectivism must be construed either as a fact or as one further interpretation—but in the former case the doctrine is clearly self-refuting, while in the latter case any reasons or arguments one may have in support of one’s perspective are (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Joseph Wayne Smith (1985). Meiland and the Self-Refutation of Protagorean Relativism. Grazer Philosophische Studien 23:119-128.score: 48.0
    In this paper I shall attempt to perform two tasks; first, to defend James Jordan's recent self-referential arguments for the inconsistency of Protagorean relativism from the criticisms of Jack Meiland, and second, to contribute towards the cause of undermining Protagorean and conceptual relativism by criticizing Meiland's own explication of the notion of relative truth.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. M. F. Burnyeat (1976). Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Plato's Theaetetus. Philosophical Review 85 (2):172-195.score: 45.0
  8. Uwe Steinhoff (2013). Rodin on Self-Defense and the “Myth” of National Self-Defense: A Refutation. Philosophia 41 (4):1017-1036.score: 45.0
    David Rodin denies that defensive wars against unjust aggression can be justified if the unjust aggression limits itself, for example, to the annexation of territory, the robbery of resources or the restriction of political freedom, but would endanger the lives, bodily integrity or freedom from slavery of the citizens only if the unjustly attacked state (or someone else) actually resisted the aggression. I will argue that Rodin’s position is not correct. First, Rodin’s comments on the necessity condition and its relation (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. M. F. Burnyeat (1976). Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Later Greek Philosophy. Philosophical Review 85 (1):44-69.score: 45.0
  10. J. L. Mackie (1964). Self-Refutation--A Formal Analysis. Philosophical Quarterly 14 (56):193-203.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Robert Lockie (2003). Relativism and Reflexivity. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (3):319 – 339.score: 45.0
    This paper develops a version of the self-refutation argument against relativism in the teeth of the prevailing response by relativists: that this argument begs the question against them. It is maintained that although weaker varieties of relativism are not self-refuting, strong varieties are faced by this argument with a choice between making themselves absolute (one thing is absolutely true - relativism); or reflexive (relativism is 'true for' the relativist). These positions are in direct conflict. The commonest response, Reflexive Relativism, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Scott F. Aikin & J. Aaron Simmons (2009). Levinasian Otherism, Skepticism, and the Problem of Self-Refutation. Philosophical Forum 40 (1):29-54.score: 45.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. M. F. Burnyeat (1976). Erratum: "Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Later Greek Philosophy". Philosophical Review 85 (3):436 -.score: 45.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Katie Terezakis, J.G. Hamann and the Self-Refutation of Radical Orthodoxy.score: 45.0
  15. Alan Bailey (1990). Pyrrhonean Scepticism and the Self-Refutation Argument. Philosophical Quarterly 40 (158):27-44.score: 45.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Mark L. Mcpherran (1987). Skeptical Homeopathy and Self-Refutation. Phronesis 32 (1):290-328.score: 45.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. J. Barnes (2012). Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine, by Luca Castagnoli. Mind 121 (482):478-485.score: 45.0
  18. Eyjólfur Kjalar Emilsson (1994). Plato's Self-Refutation Argument in "Theaetetus" 171A-C Revisited. Phronesis 39 (2):136 - 149.score: 45.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Eyjólfur Kjalar Emilsson (1994). Plato's Self‐Refutation Argument in Theaetetus 171A‐C Revisited. Phronesis 39 (2):136-149.score: 45.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. A. Quale (2010). Objections to Radical Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):12-18.score: 45.0
    Context: A number of objections that are frequently raised in the literature against radical constructivism, including: the charge of solipsism, allegations of self-refutation, social and moral reservations, and the accusation that RC cannot explain the success of science. Problem: These four objections are sought to be refuted. Results: 1. Solipsism is only troublesome against the background of a realist ontological perspective. 2. The truth-value of any proposition is only defined relative to some ontological context, thus self-refutation, as constituting (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Vasilis Politis (2012). Self-Refutation (L.) Castagnoli Ancient Self-Refutation. The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine. Pp. Xx + 394, Ills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Cased, £60. ISBN: 978-0-521-89631-3. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (1):86-88.score: 45.0
  22. W. L. Bonney (1966). Operational Self-Refutation. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (65):348-351.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Roy W. Perrett (1984). Self-Refutation in Indian Philosophy. Journal of Indian Philosophy 12 (3):237-263.score: 45.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. F. C. S. Schiller (1914). Prof. Ross on Aristotle's Self-Refutation. Mind 23 (92):558-563.score: 45.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Allan Silverman (2012). Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine. By Luca Castagnoli. Ancient Philosophy 32 (2):458-461.score: 45.0
  26. Carl Page (1992). On Being False by Self-Refutation. Metaphilosophy 23 (4):410-426.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Mary Katrina Krizan (2011). Luca Castagnoli. Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine. Augustinian Studies 42 (2):316-319.score: 45.0
  28. James Marshall, Michael Peters & Miles Shepheard (1981). Self Refutation Arguments Against Young's Epistemology. Educational Philosophy and Theory 13 (2):43–50.score: 45.0
  29. Mark Ressler (2012). Thoroughly Relativistic Perspectives. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (1):89-112.score: 45.0
    This article formulates five relative systems to evaluate the charge of self-refutation with regard to global relativism. It is demonstrated that all five of these systems support models with at least one thoroughly relativistic perspective. However, when these systems are extended to include an operator expressing the valuation of statements in a perspective, only one relative system, based on a nonnormal modal logic, supports a thoroughly relativistic perspective.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. M. Baur (2005). Incommensurable Goods, Alternative Possibilities, and the Self-Refutation of the Self-Refutation of Determinism. American Journal of Jurisprudence 50 (1):165-171.score: 45.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Andrew Beards (1995). Self-Refutation and Self-Knowledge. Gregorianum 76 (3):555-573.score: 45.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jonathan Bennett (1965). Review: J. L. Mackie, Self-Refutation--A Formal Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (3):365-366.score: 45.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. J. Boyle (2005). Free Choice, Incommensurable Goods and the Self-Refutation of Determinism. American Journal of Jurisprudence 50 (1):139-163.score: 45.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. P. Davson-Galle (1991). Can Relativism About Truth Avoid Self-Refutation?'. Metaphilosophy 22:175-178.score: 45.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Mehmet M. Erginel (2009). Relativism and Self-Refutation in the 'Theaetetus'. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 37:1-45.score: 45.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Gail Fine (1998). Relativism and Self-Refutation: Plato, Protagoras, and Burnyeat. In J. Gentzler (ed.), Method in Ancient Greek Philosophy. The Clarendon Press.score: 45.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Hallvard Fossheim (2012). Dialectic as Inter-Personal Activity: Self-Refutation and Dialectic in Plato and Aristotle / Luca Castagnoli ; The Role of the Respondent in Plato and Aristotle / Marja-Liisa Kakkuri-Knuuttila ; Division as a Method in Plato. In Jakob L. Fink (ed.), The Development of Dialectic From Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.score: 45.0
  38. R. J. Hankinson (2007). Self-Refutation and the Sorites. In Myles Burnyeat & Dominic Scott (eds.), Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford University Press. 351.score: 45.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Henry W. Johnstone Jr (1964). Self-Refutation and Validity. The Monist 48 (4):467-485.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Henry W. Johnstone Jr (1964). Self-Refutation and Validity. The Monist 48 (4):467 - 485.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Tim McGrew (1994). Scientific Progress, Relativism, and Self-Refutation. Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 2 (1).score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Jim Slagle (2013). Self-Refutation and Self-Defeat. Logique Et Analyse 222:157-164.score: 45.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Renata Zieminska (2011). Self-Refutation and Ancient Skepticism. Filozofia Nauki 19 (3):151.score: 45.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Renata Ziemińska (2012). Sextan Skepticism and Self-Refutation. Polish Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):89-99.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Audun Øfsti & Dag Østerberg (1982). Self-Defeating Predictions and the Fixed-Point Theorem: A Refutation. Inquiry 25 (3):331 – 352.score: 39.0
    Anti-naturalistic critics of Unity of Science have often tried to establish a fundamental difference between social and physical science on the grounds that research in the social field (unlike physical research) seems to interfere with the original situations so as to make accurate predictions impossible. A 'social' prediction may, e.g., itself influence the course of events so that the prediction proves false. H. A. Simon has dealt with such effects of predictions in a well-known article. Drawing on a mathematical theorem, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Alex Rajczi (2011). The Argument From Self-Creation: A Refutation of Act-Consequentialism and a Defense of Moral Options. American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (4):315.score: 36.0
    The standard form of act-consequentialism requires us to perform the action with the best consequences; it allows choice between moral options only on those rare occasions when several actions produce equally good results. This paper argues for moral options and thus against act-consequentialism. The argument turns on the insight that some valuable things cannot exist unless our moral system allows options. One such thing is the opportunity for individuals to enact plans for their life from among alternatives. Because planning one’s (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Jonathan Vogel (1993). The Problem of Self-Knowledge in Kant's "Refutation of Idealism": Two Recent Views. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):875-887.score: 36.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. N. H. Samtani (2009). Indian Buddhist Theories of Persons: Vasubandhu's “Refutation of the Theory of a Self” (Review). Philosophy East and West 59 (1):pp. 108-112.score: 36.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Louise Cummings (2001). Self-Refutations and Much More: The Dialectical Thinking of Hilary Putnam. Theoria 16 (2):237-268.score: 36.0
    In the following discussion, I examine what constitutes the dialectical strain in Putnam’s thought. As part of this examination, I consider Putnam’s (1981) criticism of the fact/value dichotomy. I compare this criticism to Putnam’s analysis of the metaphysical realist’s position, a position which has occupied Putnam’s thinking more than any other philosophical stance. I describe how Putnam pursues a chargeof self-refutation against the metaphysical realist and against the proponent of a fact/value dichotomy, a charge which assumes dialectical significance. So (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. John M. DePoe (2007). In Defense of Classical Foundationalism: A Critical Evaluation of Plantinga's Argument That Classical Foundationalism is Self-Refuting. South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):245-251.score: 36.0
    In numerous works, Alvin Plantinga argues that classical foundationalism is a failed theory of knowledge because of its self-referential incoherence. Plantinga's argument, however, fails to demonstrate that classical foundationalism is self-refuting. To bring this to light, I will review the form of Plantinga's argument in comparison with other examples of self-refutation. Upon closer inspection, it will be clear that classical foundationalism is not self-refuting, as Plantinga claims. Furthermore, I will expose another flaw in Plantinga's argument against classical foundationalism, which (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000