Search results for 'Sensation' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Superficial Pain Sensation (1969). The Exteroceptive Sensations. In P. Vinken & G. Bruyn (eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology. North Holland.score: 80.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Aaron Ben-Zeev (1984). The Passivity Assumption of the Sensation-Perception Distinction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (December):327-343.score: 24.0
    The sensation-perception distinction did not appear before the seventeenth century, but since then various formulations of it have gained wide acceptance. This is not an historical accident and the article suggests an explanation for its appearance. Section 1 describes a basic assumption underlying the sensation-perception distinction, to wit, the postulation of a pure sensory stage--viz. sensation--devoid of active influence of the agent's cognitive, emotional, and evaluative frameworks. These frameworks are passive in that stage. I call this postulation (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Andrew Chignell (2009). Descartes on Sensation: A Defense of the Semantic-Causation Model. Philosophers' Imprint 9 (5):1-22.score: 24.0
    Descartes's lack of clarity about the causal connections between brain states and mental states has led many commentators to conclude that he has no coherent account of body-mind relations in sensation, or that he was simply confused about the issue. In this paper I develop what I take to be a coherent account that was available to Descartes, and argue that there are both textual and systematic reasons to think that it was his considered view. The account has brain (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Peter Pagin (2000). Sensation Terms. Dialectica 54 (3):177-99.score: 24.0
    Are sensation ascriptions descriptive, even in the first person present tense? Do sensation terms refer to, denote, sensations, so that truth and falsity of sensation ascriptions depend on the properties of the denoted sensations? That is, do sensation terms have a denotational semantics? As I understand it, this is denied by Wittgenstein. Wittgenstein rejects the idea of a denotational semantics for public language sensation terms, such as.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Charles E. M. Dunlop (1984). Wittgenstein on Sensation and 'Seeing-As'. Synthese 60 (September):349-368.score: 24.0
    This essay begins by providing a new account of wittgenstein's private language argument. Wittgenstein's rejection of a "cartesian" account of mind is examined, And it is argued that this rejection carries no commitment to behaviorism, Or to the view that sensation terms have public meanings and private references. Part ii of the essay attempts to forge a link between the two parts of the "philosophical investigations", By arguing that wittgenstein's discussion of "seeing-As" reinforces and illuminates his account of how (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Steven M. Duncan, Could Sensation Be a Bodily Act?score: 24.0
    Hylomorphists claim that sensation is a bodily act. In this essay, I attempt to make sense of this notion but conclude that sensation is not a bodily act, but a mental one occurring in an intentional field of awareness.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Glenn D. Higginson (1935). Stimulus, Sensation, and Meaning. Journal of Philosophy 32 (24):645-650.score: 24.0
    We can find no place in psychology for the concept of stimulus as a physical agent to which an individual responds in a psychological manner. Moreover, we can find no place for sensation and image when considered as simple mental elements. We would also purge ...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Davide Panagia (2009). The Political Life of Sensation. Duke University Press.score: 24.0
    Prologue : narratocracy and the contours of political life -- From nomos to nomad : Kant, Deleuze, and Rancière on sensation -- The piazza, the edicola, and the noise of the utterance -- Machiavelli's theory of sensation and Florence's vita festiva -- The viewing subject : Caravaggio, Bacon, and the ring -- "You're eating too fast!" slow food's ethos of convivium -- Epilogue : "the photographs tell it all" : on an ethics of appearance.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Daniel D. De Haan (2010). Linguistic Apprehension as Incidental Sensation in Thomas Aquinas. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:179-196.score: 24.0
    In this paper I will delineate the psychological operations and faculties required for linguistic apprehension within a Thomistic psychology. This will require first identifying the proper object of linguistic apprehension, which will then allow me to specify the distinct operations and faculties necessary for linguistic apprehension. I will argue that the semantic value of any linguistic term is a type of incidental sensible and that its cognitive apprehension is a type of incidental sensation. Hence, the faculties necessary for the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Sandra B. Rosenthal & Patrick L. Bourgeois (1990). Sensation, Perception and Immediacy: Mead and Merleau-Ponty. Southwest Philosophy Review 6 (1):105-111.score: 24.0
    A focus on the relation between sensation and the perceptual object in the philosophies of G H Mead and Maurice Merleau-Ponty points toward their shared views of perception as non-reductionistic and holistic, as inextricably tied to the active role of the sensible body, and as involving a new understanding of the nature of immediacy within experience. This essay explores these shared views.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Walter Ott (2014). Malebranche and the Riddle of Sensation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (3):689-712.score: 21.0
  12. Jesse J. Prinz (2006). Beyond Appearances : The Content of Sensation and Perception. In Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press. 434--460.score: 21.0
    There seems to be a large gulf between percepts and concepts. In particular, con- cepts seem to be capable of representing things that percepts cannot. We can conceive of things that would be impossible to perceive. (The converse may also seem true, but I will leave that to one side.) In one respect, this is trivially right. We can conceive of things that we cannot encounter, such as unicorns. We cannot literally perceive unicorns, even if we occasionally.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Sonia Sedivy (2004). Wittgenstein's Diagnosis of Empiricism's Third Dogma: Why Perception is Not an Amalgam of Sensation and Conceptualization. Philosophical Investigations 27 (1):1-33.score: 21.0
  14. Crispin Wright (1989). Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy of Mind: Sensation, Privacy and Intention. Journal of Philosophy 86 (11):622-634.score: 21.0
  15. James T. Culbertson (1942). A Physical Theory of Sensation. Philosophy of Science 9 (April):197-226.score: 21.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. David W. Hamlyn (1994). Perception, Sensation, and Non-Conceptual Content. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (175):139-53.score: 21.0
    Some philosophers have argued recently that the content of perception is either entirely or mainly non- conceptual. Much of the motivation for that view derives from theories of information processing, which are a modern version of ancient considerations about the causal processes underlying perception. The paper argues to the contrary that perception is essentially concept- dependent. While perception must have a structure derived from what is purely sensory, and is thereby dependent on processes involving information in the technical sense which (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Walter Hopp (2008). Husserl on Sensation, Perception, and Interpretation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):pp. 219-245.score: 21.0
    Husserl's theory of perception is remarkable in several respects. For one thing, Husserl rigorously distinguishes the parts and properties of the act of consciousness - its content -from the parts and properties of the object perceived. Second, Husserl's repeated insistence that perceptual consciousness places its subject in touch with the perceived object itself, rather than some representation that does duty for it, vindicates the commonsensical and phenomenologically grounded belief that when a thing appears to us, it is precisely that thing, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Andy Clark (2000). Phenomenal Immediacy and the Doors of Sensation. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (4):21-24.score: 21.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. E. L. Mascall (1964). Perception and Sensation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64:259-272.score: 21.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. N. Jolley (1995). Sensation, Intentionality, and Animal Consciousness. Ratio 8 (2):128-42.score: 21.0
  21. William C. Kneale (1951). Sensation and the Physical World. Philosophical Quarterly 1 (January):109-126.score: 21.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Charles Hartshorne (1963). Sensation in Psychology and Philosophy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):3-14.score: 21.0
  23. George Teschner (1981). The Undifferentiated Conjunction of Sensation and Judgment in Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (September):119-122.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Thomas C. Vinci (1981). Sellars and the Adverbial Theory of Sensation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11 (June):199-217.score: 21.0
  25. Patrick Mckee (1976). An Explanation-Model of Visual Sensation. Philosophical Studies 29 (June):457-464.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Douglas Odegard (1972). Anscombe, Sensation and Intentional Objects. Dialogue 11 (March):69-77.score: 21.0
  27. Richard W. Momeyer (1975). Is Pleasure a Sensation? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36 (September):113-21.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. S. Dumpleton (1988). Sensation and Function. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66 (September):376-89.score: 21.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Frederik Kaufman (1990). Conceptual Necessity, Causality and Self-Ascriptions of Sensation. International Studies in Philosophy 22 (3):3-11.score: 21.0
  30. Brian Massumi (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Duke University Press.score: 21.0
    Replacing the traditional opposition of literal and figural with new distinctions between stasis and motion and between actual and virtual,Parables for the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Norman M. Swartz (1974). Can the Theory of Contingent Identity Between Sensation-States and Brain-States Be Made Empirical? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (March):405-17.score: 21.0
  32. Alon Confino (2009). 1. Narrative Form and Historical Sensation: On Saul Friedländer's the Years of Extermination1. History and Theory 48 (3):199-219.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. J. Donald Harris & Cecil K. Myers (1949). The Emergence of a Tonal Sensation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (2):228.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. G. K. Yacorzynski & M. Brown (1941). Studies of the Sensation of Vibration: 1. Variability of the Vibratory Threshold as a Function of Amplitude and Frequency of Mechanical Vibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (6):509.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. R. T. Holland (1920). On the 'After-Sensation' of Pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology 3 (4):302.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. C. E. Lauterbach & R. E. Crouser (1933). Sensation Cues to Moisture. Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (2):328.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. K. C. Mukherjee (1933). The Duration of Cutaneous Sensation (I) and the Improvement of its Sensible Discrimination by Practice (II). Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (2):339.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Joseph C. Stevens, Joel D. Mack & S. S. Stevens (1960). Growth of Sensation on Seven Continua as Measured by Force of Handgrip. Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (1):60.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. A. Sweetland (1945). Fluctuation of Sensation of Liminal Visual Stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology 35 (6):459.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. G. E. M. Anscombe (1974). The Subjectivity of Sensation. Ajatus 36:3-18.score: 21.0
  41. Jaakko Blomberg (1971). Psychophysics, Sensation and Information. Ajatus 33:106-137.score: 21.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. J. Dokic (2003). The Sense of Ownership: An Analogy Between Sensation and Action. In Johannes Roessler (ed.), Agency and Self-Awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 321–344.score: 21.0
  43. Fred Dretske (2003). Sensation and Perception (1981). In Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge MA: Bradford Book/MIT Press.score: 21.0
  44. Daniel Heller-Roazen (2007). The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation. Distributed by the Mit Press.score: 21.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. J. Michael Hinton (1974). This is Visual Sensation. In Wisdom: Twelve Essays. Blackwell.score: 21.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Ramon M. Lemos (1964). Sensation, Perception, and the Given. Ratio 6 (June):63-80.score: 21.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. H. H. Price (1944). Touch and Organic Sensation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 44:I.score: 21.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Theodore S. Voelkel (1973). Sellars' Treatment of Sensation. Personalist 54:130-148.score: 21.0
  49. Marvin Zuckerman (1984). Sensation Seeking: A Comparative Approach to a Human Trait. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (3):413.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Benj Hellie (2007). That Which Makes the Sensation of Blue a Mental Fact: Moore on Phenomenal Relationism. European Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):334-66.score: 18.0
    I interpret the anti-idealist manoeuverings of the second half of Moore's 'The refutation of idealism', material as widely cited for its discussion of 'transparency' and 'diaphanousness' as it is deeply obscure. The centerpiece of these manoeuverings is a phenomenological argument for a relational view of perceptual phenomenal character, on which, roughly, 'that which makes the sensation of blue a mental fact' is a non-intentional relation of conscious awareness, a view close to the opposite of the most characteristic contemporary view (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000