24 found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Paul Bou-Habib & Serena Olsaretti, Autonomy and Children's Well-Being.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paul Bou‐Habib & Serena Olsaretti (2013). Equality, Autonomy, and the Price of Parenting. Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (4):420-438.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Serena Olsaretti (2013). Children as Public Goods? Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (3):226-258.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Serena Olsaretti (2013). Rescuing Justice and Equality From Libertarianism. Economics and Philosophy 29 (1):43-63.
    One of the central motifs of G. A. Cohen's work was his opposition to capitalism in the name of justice. This motif was fully in view in Cohen's work on Robert Nozick's libertarianism: Cohen carefully reconstructed and relentlessly criticized Nozick's apologetics of the free market, which, he thought, was internally coherent but unconvincing. This article suggests that Cohen's opposition to libertarianism did not, however, go far enough, and identifies two respects in which Cohen's position could and should have been more (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Serena Olsaretti (2013). Scanlon on Responsibility and the Value of Choice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):465-483.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Paul Bou-Habib & Serena Olsaretti (2012). Equality of Resources and the Demands of Authenticity. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Serena Olsaretti (2012). Measuring Justice. Social Theory and Practice 38 (1):180-186.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Serena Olsaretti (2012). Mark Stein, Distributive Justice and Disability: Utilitarianism Against Egalitarianism (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2006), Pp. X + 304. – CORRIGENDUM. [REVIEW] Utilitas 24 (02):313-.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Serena Olsaretti (2011). Mark Stein, Distributive Justice and Disability: Utilitarianism Against Egalitarianism (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2006), Pp. X + 304. Utilitas 23 (03):355-358.
  10. Serena Olsaretti (2009). Choice, Circumstance and the Costs of Children. In Stephen de Wijze, Matthew H. Kramer & Ian Carter (eds.), Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice. Routledge.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Serena Olsaretti (2009). Levelling the Playing Field: The Idea of Equal Opportunity and its Place in Egalitarian Thought. Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (1):133-136.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Serena Olsaretti (2009). Responsibility and the Consequences of Choice. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt2):165-188.
    Contemporary egalitarian theories of justice constrain the demands of equality by responsibility, and do not view as unjust inequalities that are traceable to individuals' choices. This paper argues that, in order to make non-arbitrary determinate judgements of responsibility, any theory of justice needs a principle of stakes , that is, an account of what consequences choices should have. The paper also argues that the principles of stakes seemingly presupposed by egalitarians are implausible, and that adopting alternative principles of stakes amounts (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Serena Olsaretti (2007). Review: The Limits of Hedonism: Feldman on the Value of Attitudinal Pleasure. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 136 (3):409 - 415.
  14. Serena Olsaretti (2006). Introduction. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 81 (59):1-.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Serena Olsaretti (2005). Endorsement and Freedom in Amartya Sen's Capability Approach. Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):89-108.
    A central question for assessing the merits of Amartya Sen's capability approach as a potential answer to the “distribution of what”? question concerns the exact role and nature of freedom in that approach. Sen holds that a person's capability identifies that person's effective freedom to achieve valuable states of beings and doings, or functionings, and that freedom so understood, rather than achieved functionings themselves, is the primary evaluative space. Sen's emphasis on freedom has been criticised by G. A. Cohen, according (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Paul Bou-Habib & Serena Olsaretti (2004). Land Disputes and Auctions: A Response to Steiner and Wolff. Analysis 64 (3):284–287.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Paul Bou-Habib & Serena Olsaretti (2004). Liberal Egalitarianism and Workfare. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3):257-270.
  18. Serena Olsaretti (2004). Liberty, Desert and the Market: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge University Press.
    Are inequalities of income created by the free market just? In this book Serena Olsaretti examines two main arguments that justify those inequalities: the first claims that they are just because they are deserved, and the second claims that they are just because they are what free individuals are entitled to. Both these arguments purport to show, in different ways, that giving responsible individuals their due requires that free market inequalities in incomes be allowed. Olsaretti argues, however, that neither argument (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Serena Olsaretti (ed.) (2003). Desert and Justice. Oxford University Press.
    Does justice require that individuals get what they deserve? Serena Olsaretti brings together new essays by leading moral and political philosophers examining the relation between desert and justice; they also illuminate the nature of distributive justice, and the relationship between desert and other values, such as equality and responsibility.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Serena Olsaretti (2003). Distributive Justice and Compensatory Desert. In , Desert and Justice. Clarendon Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Serena Olsaretti (2003). Eguaglianza e merito: valori in conflitto? Rivista di Filosofia 94 (2):285-304.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Serena Olsaretti (2003). Review: Making Moral Sense: Beyond Habermas and Gauthier. [REVIEW] Mind 112 (445):142-145.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Serena Olsaretti (2002). Unmasking Equality? Kagan on Equality and Desert. Utilitas 14 (03):387-.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Serena Olsaretti (1998). Freedom, Force and Choice: Against the Rights-Based Definition of Voluntariness. Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (1):53–78.