9 found
Sort by:
  1. Seung-Kee Lee (2012). Self-Determination and the Categories of Freedom in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Kant-Studien 103 (3):337-350.
    Kant speaks of our capacity to be “self-determining [...] in certain [...] laws hold- ing firm a priori” (KrV, B 430). Here the “laws” refer to the categories of freedom introduced in KpV. The categories of freedom, then, are necessary for self-determination. I first explain how Kant employs the notion of determination in his theoretical philosophy. I then explain how the notion is utilized also in his practical philosophy, particularly in connection to the act of determining the forms of willing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Seung-Kee Lee (2011). Review: Buroker, Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 16 (1):156-159.
  3. Seung-Kee Lee (2011). Study of the History of Philosophy: The Active and Passive Mind in Augustine. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 103 (4):677-690.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Seung-Kee Lee (2009). The Synthetic a Priori in Kant and German Idealism. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 91 (3):288-328.
    In twentieth-century Kant scholarship, few have provided an account of the analytic-synthetic distinction and of the problem of the synthetic a priori that takes into consideration the views of Kant's idealist successors such as Maimon, Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. I first explain how Kant formulates the analytic-synthetic distinction in terms of the determinate-indeterminate distinction, which, in turn, is based on the distinction between general and transcendental logic. Kant's problem of the synthetic a priori , then, is the problem of showing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Seung-Kee Lee (2008). How Are Synthetic Judgments Possible A Priori? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:171-180.
    Kant’s analytic-synthetic distinction is often construed in terms of the question of whether or not the predicate is contained in or can be derived from the concept of the subject. Few have observed that Kant has another formulation of the distinction, a formulation that is based on the determinate-indeterminate distinction. In fact, it is this formulation that will shape the development of one of the main tasks of post-Kantian German idealism. It is my aim to explain how Kant, Maimon, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Seung-Kee Lee (2004). Freedom and Anthropology in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (4):569-574.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Seung-Kee Lee (2004). The Determinate-Indeterminate Distinction and Kants Theory of Judgment. Kant-Studien 95 (2):204-225.
  8. Seung-Kee Lee (2000). Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):444-445.