9 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Sharon Ryan (West Virginia University)
  1. Sharon Ryan (2012). Wisdom, Knowledge and Rationality. Acta Analytica 27 (2):99-112.
    After surveying the strengths and weaknesses of several well-known approaches to wisdom, I argue for a new theory of wisdom that focuses on being epistemically, practically, and morally rational. My theory of wisdom, The Deep Rationality Theory of Wisdom, claims that a wise person is a person who is rational and who is deeply committed to increasing his or her level of rationality. This theory is a departure from theories of wisdom that demand practical and/or theoretical knowledge. The Deep Rationality (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Sharon Ryan, Wisdom. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Sharon Ryan (2003). Doxastic Compatibilism and the Ethics of Belief. Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):47-79.
  4. Sharon Ryan (1999). The Logic of Rationality. Philosophia 27 (1-2):287-299.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Sharon Ryan (1999). What is Wisdom? Philosophical Studies 93 (2):119-139.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Sharon Ryan (1998). The Logic of Rationality. Philosophia 26 (3-4):287-299.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Sharon Ryan (1996). Does Warrant Entail Truth? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (1):183-192.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Sharon Ryan (1996). The Epistemic Virtues of Consistency. Synthese 109 (2):121-141.
    The lottery paradox has been discussed widely. The standard solution to the lottery paradox is that a ticket holder is justified in believing each ticket will lose but the ticket holder is also justified in believing not all of the tickets will lose. If the standard solution is true, then we get the paradoxical result that it is possible for a person to have a justified set of beliefs that she knows is inconsistent. In this paper, I argue that the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Sharon Ryan (1991). The Preface Paradox. Philosophical Studies 64 (3):293-307.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation