25 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Shelley Tremain (University of Toronto)
  1. Shelley Tremain (forthcoming). Disabling Philosophy. Philosophers' Magazine (63).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Shelley Tremain (forthcoming). Foucault and (A) Feminist Philosophy of Disability. University of Michigan Press.
  3. Shelley Tremain (ed.) (forthcoming). Foucault and the Government of Disability, Second Edition. 2014.
  4. Shelley Tremain (2013). Educating Jouy. Hypatia 28 (2):801-817.
    The feminist charge that Michel Foucault's work in general and his history of sexuality in particular are masculinist, sexist, and reflect male biases vexes feminist philosophers of disability who believe his claims about (for instance) the constitution of subjects, genealogy, governmentality, discipline, and regimes of truths imbue their feminist analyses of disability and ableism with complexity and richness, as well as inspire theoretical sophistication and intellectual rigor in the fields of philosophy of disability and disability studies more generally. No aspect (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Shelley Tremain, Introducing Feminist Philosophy of Disability. Disability Studies Quarterly.
  6. Shelley Tremain (2013). Review of Christine Overall`s Why Have Children? The Ethical Debate. [REVIEW] APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 12 (2).
  7. Shelley Tremain (2012). Review Essay of Racism and Sexual Oppression in Anglo-America: A Genealogy by Ladelle McWhorter and The Faces of Intellectual Disability: Philosophical Reflections by Licia Carlson. [REVIEW] Hypatia 27 (2):440-445.
  8. Shelley Tremain (2011). The Faces of Intellectual Disability: Philosophical Reflections. By Licia Carlson. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009.Racism and Sexual Oppression in Anglo-America: A Genealogy. By Ladelle McWhorter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009. [REVIEW] Hypatia 27 (2):440-445.
  9. Shelley Tremain (2010). Biopower, Styles of Reasoning, and What's Still Missing From the Stem Cell Debates. Hypatia 25 (3):577 - 609.
    Until now, philosophical debate about human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research has forgely been limited to its ethical dimensions and implications. Although the importance and urgency of these ethical debates should not be underestimated, the almost undivided attention that mainstream and feminist philosophers have paid to the ethical dimensions of hESC research suggests that the only philosophically interesting questions and concerns about it are by and hrge ethical in nature. My argument goes some distance to challenge the assumption that ethical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Shelley Tremain (2009). Alice Domurat Dreger,One of Us: Conjoined Twins and the Future of Normal(Harvard University Press, 2004). International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):181-184.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Shelley Tremain (2009). One of Us: Conjoined Twins and the Future of Normal (Review). International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):181-184.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Shelley Tremain (2009). Review of One of Us: Conjoined Twins and the Future of Normal by Alice Domurat Dreger. [REVIEW] International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):181-184.
  13. Shelley Tremain (2008). The Biopolitics of Bioethics and Disability. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2/3):101-106.
  14. Shelley Tremain (2006). Foucault, Power, and the Subject of Impairment. In Lennard J. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader. Psychology Press. 185.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Shelley Tremain (2006). On the Government of Disability: Foucault, Power, and the Subject of Impairment. In Lennard J. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader.
  16. Shelley Tremain (2006). Reproductive Freedom, Self-Regulation, and the Government of Impairment in Utero. Hypatia 21 (1):35-53.
    : This article critically examines the constitution of impairment in prenatal testing and screening practices and various discourses that surround these technologies. While technologies to test and screen (for impairment) prenatally are claimed to enhance women's capacity to be self-determining, make informed reproductive choices, and, in effect, wrest control of their bodies from a patriarchal medical establishment, I contend that this emerging relation between pregnant women and reproductive technologies is a new strategy of a form of power that began to (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Shelley Tremain (2006). Stemming the Tide of Normalisation: An Expanded Feminist Analysis of the Ethics and Social Impact of Embryonic Stem Cell Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):33-42.
    Feminists have indicated the inadequacies of bioethical debates about human embryonic stem cell research, which have for the most part revolved around concerns about the moral status of the human embryo. Feminists have argued, for instance, that inquiry concerning the ethics and politics of human embryonic stem cell research should consider the relations of social power in which the research is embedded. My argument is that this feminist work on stem cells is itself inadequate, however, insofar as it has not (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Shelley Tremain (ed.) (2005). Foucault and the Government of Disability. University of Michigan Press.
    The provocative essays in this volume respond to Foucault's call to question what is regarded as natural, inevitable, ethical, and liberating, while they ...
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Shelley Tremain (2005). Foucault, Governmentality, and Critical Disability Theory: An Introduction. In , Foucault and the Government of Disability. University of Michigan Press. 1--24.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Shelley Tremain (2003). Theoretical Perspectives on the Construction of the Gendered Body and Disability. In Penny Van Esterik (ed.), Head, Heart, and Hand: Partnerships for Women's Health in Canadian Environments.
  21. Shelley Tremain (2002). On the Subject of Impairment. In Corker And Shakespeare (ed.), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. 32.
  22. Shelley Tremain (2001). On the Government of Disability. Social Theory and Practice 27 (4):617-636.
  23. Shelley Tremain (2000). Queering Disabled Sexuality Studies. Sexuality and Disability 18 (4):291-299.
  24. Shelley Tremain (1997). Book Review: The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability by Susan Wendell. New York: Routledge, 1996. [REVIEW] Hypatia 12 (2):219-223.
  25. Shelley Tremain (1996). Dworkin on Disablement and Resources. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 9 (2):343-359.