Search results for 'Shirley E. Williams' (try it on Scholar)

989 found
Sort by:
  1. Hyung S. Choi, David F. Siemens & Shirley E. Williams (eds.) (2001). Naturalism: Its Impact on Science, Religion and Literature. Canyon Institute for Advanced Studies.score: 290.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. M. E. Williams (1972). Philosophy: Volume 3. By Karl Jaspers. Translated by E. B. Ashton. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 1971. Pp. Xii, 208. $10.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 11 (02):306-309.score: 210.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Michael Williams, Frederick F. Schmitt, Erin I. Kelly & Louis E. Loeb (2004). A Symposium on Louis E. Loeb, Stability and Justification in Hume's Treatise. Hume Studies 30 (2):265-404.score: 210.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Bernard Arthur Owen Williams (1995). Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Papers, 1982-1993. Cambridge University Press.score: 150.0
    This new volume of philosophical papers by Bernard Williams is divided into three sections: the first Action, Freedom, Responsibility, the second Philosophy, Evolution and the Human Sciences; in which appears the essay which gives the collection its title; and the third Ethics, which contains essays closely related to his 1983 book Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Like the two earlier volumes of Williams's papers published by Cambridge University Press, Problems of the Self and Moral Luck, this volume (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.) (2007). Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.score: 150.0
    G. E. Moore observed that to assert, 'I went to the pictures last Tuesday but I don't believe that I did' would be 'absurd'. Over half a century later, such sayings continue to perplex philosophers. In the definitive treatment of the famous paradox, Green and Williams explain its history and relevance and present new essays by leading thinkers in the area.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. John R. Williams, Dominique Sprumont, Marie Hirtle, Clement Adebamowo, Paul Braunschweiger, Susan Bull, Christian Burri, Marek Czarkowski, Chien Te Fan, Caroline Franck, Eugenjius Gefenas, Antoine Geissbuhler, Ingrid Klingmann, Bocar Kouyaté, Jean-Pierre Kraehenbhul, Mariana Kruger, Keymanthri Moodley, Francine Ntoumi, Thomas Nyirenda, Alexander Pym, Henry Silverman & Sara Tenorio (forthcoming). Consensus Standards for Introductory E-Learning Courses in Human Participants Research Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics:2013-101572.score: 150.0
    This paper reports the results of a workshop held in January 2013 to begin the process of establishing standards for e-learning programmes in the ethics of research involving human participants that could serve as the basis of their evaluation by individuals and groups who want to use, recommend or accredit such programmes. The standards that were drafted at the workshop cover the following topics: designer/provider qualifications, learning goals, learning objectives, content, methods, assessment of participants and assessment of the course. The (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. E. Wager & P. Williams (2011). Why and How Do Journals Retract Articles? An Analysis of Medline Retractions 1988-2008. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (9):567-570.score: 140.0
    Background Journal editors are responsible for what they publish and therefore have a duty to correct the record if published work is found to be unreliable. One method for such correction is retraction of an article. Anecdotal evidence suggested a lack of consistency in journal policies and practices regarding retraction. In order to develop guidelines, we reviewed retractions in Medline to discover how and why articles were retracted. Methods We retrieved all available Medline retractions from 2005 to 2008 and a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Edwin E. Gantt & Richard N. Williams (forthcoming). Psychology and the Legacy of Newtonianism: Motivation, Intentionality, and the Ontological Gap. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology.score: 140.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. D. Rudolph, L. -L. Andersson, R. Bengtsson, J. Ekman, O. Erten, C. Fahlander, E. K. Johansson, I. Ragnarsson, C. Andreoiu, M. A. Bentley, M. P. Carpenter, R. J. Charity, R. M. Clark, P. Fallon, A. O. Macchiavelli, W. Reviol, D. G. Sarantites, D. Seweryniak, C. E. Svensson & S. J. Williams, Isospin and Deformation Studies in the Odd-Odd N = Z Nucleus Co-54.score: 140.0
    High-spin states in the odd-odd N = Z nucleus Co-54 have been investigated by the fusion-evaporation reaction Si-28(S-32,1 alpha 1p1n)Co-54. Gamma-ray information gathered with the Ge detector array Gammasphere was correlated with evaporated particles detected in the charged particle detector system Microball and a 1 pi neutron detector array. A significantly extended excitation scheme of Co-54 is presented, which includes a candidate for the isospin T = 1, 6(+) state of the 1f(7/2)(-2) multiplet. The results are compared to large-scale shell-model (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. James E. Deacon, Austin E. Williams, Cindy Deacon Williams & Jack E. Williams (2007). Fueling Population Growth in Las Vegas: How Large-Scale Groundwater Withdrawal Could Burn Regional Biodiversity. Bioscience 57 (8):688-698.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Ronael E. Eckman, Robert Williams & Craig Nagoshi (2002). Marital Assortment for Genetic Similarity. Journal of Biosocial Science 34 (4):511-523.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. James E. Faulconer & R. Williams (eds.) (1990). Reconsidering Psychology. Duquesne University Press.score: 140.0
  13. Andrew G. Fountain, John L. Campbell, Edward Ag Schuur, Sharon E. Stammerjohn, Mark W. Williams & Hugh W. Ducklow (2012). The Disappearing Cryosphere: Impacts and Ecosystem Responses to Rapid Cryosphere Loss. Bioscience 62 (4):405-415.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Kurt Marko, R. C. Elwood, Fred Seddon, John D. Windhausen, Timothy E. O'Connor & Robert C. Williams (1989). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 37 (4):227-229.score: 140.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. P. Murphy, E. Dunning & J. Williams (1988). Soccer Crowd Disorder and the Press: Processes of Amplification and De-Amplification in Historical Perspective. Theory, Culture and Society 5 (3):645-673.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. B. N. Rock, J. E. Vogelmann, D. L. Williams, A. F. Vogelmann & T. Hoshi (1986). Aki." Remote Detection of Forest Damage. Bioscience 36 (7).score: 140.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Paul J. Schafer, Nicholas V. Costantino, Walter P. Krolikowski, Clyde E. Crum, R. Williams, Christopher J. Lucas, George M. Bellack, Val D. Rust, Miller Jr & Richard R. Renner (1975). Book Review Section 3. [REVIEW] Ethics and Behavior 6 (1):75-83.score: 140.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Clifford E. Williams (1980). Free Will and Determinism: A Dialogue. Hackett.score: 120.0
    FREE WILL and DETERMINISM A Dialogue Participants: FREDERICK: Free-willist DANIEL: Determinist CAROLYN: Compatibilist INTRODUCTORY REMARKS FREDERICK: Here ..
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Neil E. Williams (2011). Putnam's Traditional Neo-Essentialism. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):151 - 170.score: 120.0
    Recently, several philosophers have defended what might be called `neo-essentialism' about natural kinds. Their views purport to improve upon the traditional essentialism of Kripke and Putnam by rejecting the claim that essences must be comprised of intrinsic properties. I argue that this so-called break from traditional essentialism is not a break at all, because the widespread interpretation of Putnam according to which he takes essences to be intrinsic is mistaken. Putnam makes no claim to the effect that essences of natural (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Andrea Borghini & Neil E. Williams (2008). A Dispositional Theory of Possibility. Dialectica 62 (1):21–41.score: 120.0
    – The paper defends a naturalistic version of modal actualism according to which what is metaphysically possible is determined by dispositions found in the actual world. We argue that there is just one world—this one—and that all genuine possibilities are anchored by the dispositions exemplified in this world. This is the case regardless of whether or not those dispositions are manifested. As long as the possibility is one that would obtain were the relevant disposition manifested, it is a genuine possibility. (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Neil E. Williams (2011). Dispositions and the Argument From Science. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):71 - 90.score: 120.0
    Central to the debate between Humean and anti-Humean metaphysics is the question of whether dispositions can exist in the absence of categorical properties that ground them (that is, where the causal burden is shifted on to categorical properties on which the dispositions would therefore supervene). Dispositional essentialists claim that they can; categoricalists reject the possibility of such ?baseless? dispositions, requiring that all dispositions must ultimately have categorical bases. One popular argument, recently dubbed the ?Argument from Science?, has appeared in one (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Neil E. Williams (2010). Puzzling Powers: The Problem of Fit. In Anna Marmodoro (ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations. Routledge. 84--105.score: 120.0
    – The conjunction of three plausible theses about the nature of causal powers—that they are intrinsic, that their effects are produced mutually, and that the manifestations they are for are essential to them—leads to a problem concerning the ability of causal powers to work together to produce manifestations. I call this problem the problem of fit. Fortunately for proponents of a power-based metaphysic, the problem of fit is not insurmountable. Fit can be engineered if powers are properties whose natures are (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. David M. Williams, Sophie E. Lind & Francesca Happé (2009). Metacognition May Be More Impaired Than Mindreading in Autism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):162-163.score: 120.0
    This commentary focuses on evidence from autism concerning the relation between metacognition and mindreading. We support Carruthers' rejection of models 1 (independent systems) and 3 (metacognition before mindreading), and provide evidence to strengthen his critique. However, we also present evidence from autism that we believe supports model 2 (one mechanism, two modes of access) over model 4 (mindreading is prior).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Neil E. Williams (2011). Arthritis and Nature's Joints. In Michael O'Rourke, Joseph Keim Campbell & Matthew H. Slater (eds.), Carving Nature at its Joints. Mit Press.score: 120.0
  25. J. T. Eberl, E. D. Kinney & M. J. Williams (2012). Foundation For A Natural Right To Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (6):537-557.score: 120.0
    Discussions concerning whether there is a natural right to health care may occur in various forms, resulting in policy recommendations for how to implement any such right in a given society. But health care policies may be judged by international standards including the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). The rights enumerated in the UDHR are grounded in traditions of moral theory, a philosophical analysis of which is necessary in order to adjudicate the value of specific policies designed (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Gerald Corey, George T. Williams & Mary E. Moline (1995). Ethical and Legal Issues in Group Counseling. Ethics and Behavior 5 (2):161 – 183.score: 120.0
    Legal and ethical issues involved in group work are reviewed and discussed. Variations in different professional ethics codes are discussed. Recommendations for consideration by group leaders are made.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Neil E. Williams, Do Zombies Hunger for Humean Brains?score: 120.0
    John Heil’s From an Ontological Point of View (Heil 2003) is a tremendous philosophical work. The neo-Lockean ontology the reader finds within its 267 pages is a sensible and refreshing alternative to the neo-Humean ontologies which presently occupy the vast majority of the metaphysical literature. What Heil offers is a much needed change in perspective. Nor are the strengths of the book limited to Heil’s willingness to approach central metaphysical problems in largely untried and unpopular way; the book is very (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Clifford E. Williams (1992). The Phenomenology of B-Time. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):123-137.score: 120.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Richard N. Williams & Edwin E. Gantt (2012). Felt Moral Obligation and the Moral Judgement–Moral Action Gap: Toward a Phenomenology of Moral Life. Journal of Moral Education 41 (4):417-435.score: 120.0
    The step-off point for this article is the problem of the ?moral judgement?moral action gap? as found in contemporary literature of moral education and moral development. We argue that this gap, and the conceptual problems encountered by attempts to bridge it, reflects the effect of a different, deeper and more problematic conceptual gap: the ?ontological? gap between meaningful moral events and the underlying natural structures or mechanical processes presumed to produce them. We contend that the very real fact that moral (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Neil E. Williams (2011). Putting Powers Back on Multi-Track. Philosophia 39 (3):581-595.score: 120.0
    Power theorists are divided on the question of whether individual powers are single-track (for a single manifestation type) or are multi-track (capable of producing distinct manifestation types for distinct stimuli). EJ Lowe has recently defended single-tracking, arguing that the multi-tracker can provide no adequate reason for treating powers as capable of having multiple manifestation types, and claiming that putative instances of multi-track powers are either single-track powers in need of unifying descriptions or are merely several single-track powers. I respond to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. D. Pimentel, N. Brown, F. Vecchio, V. La Capra, S. Hausman, O. Lee, A. Diaz, J. Williams, S. Cooper & E. Newburger (1992). Ethical Issues Concerning Potential Global Climate Change on Food Production. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (2):113-146.score: 120.0
    Burning fossil fuel in the North American continent contributes more to the CO2 global warming problem than in any other continent. The resulting climate changes are expected to alter food production. The overall changes in temperature, moisture, carbon dioxide, insect pests, plant pathogens, and weeds associated with global warming are projected to reduce food production in North America. However, in Africa, the projected slight rise in rainfall is encouraging, especially since Africa already suffers from severe shortages of rainfall. For all (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. F. Williams (1996). C. Gallavotti (Ed.): Theocritus Quique Feruntur Bucolici Graeci, 3rd Edtion. (Scriptores Graeci Et Latini Consilio Academiae Lynceorum Editi.) Rome: Istituto Poligrafico E Zecca Dello Stato, 1993. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (1):154-155.score: 120.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. C. Stephen Evans, Mark C. E. Peterson, Paul G. Muscari, Robert R. Williams, M. Jamie Ferreira, James C. Edwards & John Macquarrie (1990). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 28 (1):47-61.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Thomas Williams, History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (1997): 55-59. Review of T.J. Holopainen, Dialectic & Theology in the Eleventh Century . Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1996. [REVIEW]score: 120.0
    A venerable story in the history of medieval philosophy has it that the eleventh century saw a debate between certain 'dialecticians', who exalted the role of reason and disdained theological authority, and 'anti-dialecticians', who carefully limited—or even rejected—the application of dialectical reasoning to Christian doctrine. A number of authors have called into question certain details of this story, but in..
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. John N. Williams (2013). The Completeness of the Pragmatic Solution to Moore's Paradox in Belief: A Reply to Chan. Synthese 190 (12):2457-2476.score: 120.0
    Moore’s paradox in belief is the fact that beliefs of the form ‘ p and I do not believe that p ’ are ‘absurd’ yet possibly true. Writers on the paradox have nearly all taken the absurdity to be a form of irrationality. These include those who give what Timothy Chan calls the ‘pragmatic solution’ to the paradox. This solution turns on the fact that having the Moorean belief falsifies its content. Chan, who also takes the absurdity to be a (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Neil E. Williams (2007). Review of Peter Unger, Philosophical Papers: Volumes 1 & 2. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (2).score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Sharon E. Williams & Rebecca A. Rialon (2011). Illuminating the Complexities of Ethical Decision Making. Ethics and Behavior 21 (3):261 - 262.score: 120.0
    Ethics & Behavior, Volume 21, Issue 3, Page 261-262, May-June 2011.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. M. E. Williams (1970). On the Dissolution of the Paradox of Dives and Lazarus. Mind 79 (314):253.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Diane E. Williams, Patterns of Eye Movements During Parallel and Serial Visual Search Tasks.score: 120.0
    Abstnn Eye movements were monitored while subjects performed parallel and serial sarah tasks. In Experiment la, subjects searched for an “O' among "X"s (parallel condition) and for a 'T" among "L"s (serial condition). In the parallel condition of Eqcriment lb, “q)" was the target and “O"s were distractors; in the serial condition, time..
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Howard Shevrin, W. J. Williams, R. E. Marshall & Linda A. Brakel (1992). Event-Related Potential Indicators of the Dynamic Unconscious. Consciousness and Cognition 1 (3):340-66.score: 120.0
  41. M. E. Williams (1972). Philosophy of Existence. By Karl Jaspers. Translated and with an Introduction by Richard F. Grabau. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia. 1971. Pp. Xxvii, 99. $1.95. [REVIEW] Dialogue 11 (01):159-162.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Hiranmoy Banerjee, Fred A. Westphal, M. E. Williams, Stephen D. Crites, Don Locke, Robert S. Hartman, Warren E. Steinkraus & Donald W. Sherburne (1962). Problems and Perplexities. Review of Metaphysics 16 (1):133 - 162.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Timothy E. O'Connor, John W. Murphy, John Riser, Thomas Nemeth & Robert C. Williams (1995). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 47 (1-2):93-95.score: 120.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. C. J. F. Williams (1983). Malcolm Schofield, Martha Craven Nussbaum (Edd.): Language and Logos. Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen. Pp. Xiii + 359; Frontispiece. Cambridge University Press, 1982. £27.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 33 (02):331-332.score: 120.0
  45. M. E. Williams (1970). Time in Hegel's Philosophy. Dialogue 9 (02):154-167.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. D. C. Malloy, J. Williams, T. Hadjistavropoulos, B. Krishnan, M. Jeyaraj, E. F. McCarthy, M. Murakami, S. Paholpak, J. Mafukidze & B. Hillis (2008). Ethical Decision-Making About Older Adults and Moral Intensity: An International Study of Physicians. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):285-296.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. M. E. Williams (1968). Begging the Question? Dialogue 6 (04):567-570.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Bailey E. Williams, Andrew M. Pomerantz, Daniel J. Segrist & Jonathan C. Pettibone (2010). How Impaired is Too Impaired? Ratings of Psychologist Impairment by Psychologists in Independent Practice. Ethics and Behavior 20 (2):149 – 160.score: 120.0
    Although psychologist impairment has received attention from researchers, there is a paucity of empirical data aimed at determining the point at which such impairment necessitates action. The purpose of this study was to provide such empirical data. Members of Division 42 ( n = 285) responded to vignettes describing a psychologist whose symptoms of either depression or substance abuse varied across five levels of severity. Results identified specific levels of impairment at which psychologists were deemed too impaired to practice psychotherapy, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. M. E. Williams (1968). How is Metaphysics Possible as a Science? Dialogue 6 (04):585-595.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. M. E. Williams (1973). Review: Jones, Kant's Principle of Personality. [REVIEW] Dialogue 12 (02):342-344.score: 120.0
1 — 50 / 989