1. Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Han L. J. van der Maas & Simon Farrell (2012). Abstract Concepts Require Concrete Models: Why Cognitive Scientists Have Not Yet Embraced Nonlinearly Coupled, Dynamical, Self-Organized Critical, Synergistic, Scale-Free, Exquisitely Context-Sensitive, Interaction-Dominant, Multifractal, Interdependent Brain-Body-Niche Systems. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):87-93.
    After more than 15 years of study, the 1/f noise or complex-systems approach to cognitive science has delivered promises of progress, colorful verbiage, and statistical analyses of phenomena whose relevance for cognition remains unclear. What the complex-systems approach has arguably failed to deliver are concrete insights about how people perceive, think, decide, and act. Without formal models that implement the proposed abstract concepts, the complex-systems approach to cognitive science runs the danger of becoming a philosophical exercise in futility. The complex-systems (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Stephan Lewandowsky & Simon Farrell (2003). Working Memory, Computational Models Of. In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Simon Farrell & Stephan Lewandowsky (2000). The Case Against Distributed Representations: Lack of Evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):476-477.
    We focus on two components of Page's argument in favour of localist representations in connectionist networks: First, we take issue with the claim that localist representations can give rise to generalisation and show that whenever generalisation occurs, distributed representations are involved. Second, we counter the alleged shortcomings of distributed representations and show that their properties are preferable to those of localist approaches.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation