28 found
Sort by:
  1. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2012). Moralnost Uporabe Kontracepcije I Otvorenost Prokreaciji. Filozofija I Društvo 4:4-18.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2012). The Moral Status of Contraception and Openness to Procreation. Filozofija I Društvo 23 (4):4-18.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija & Iris Vidmar (2012). Fikcijsko svjedočanstvo. Prolegomena 11 (1):65-82.
    U suvremene rasprave o svjedočanstvu C. A. J. Coady uveo je pojam patologije. Radi se o stanovitim otklonima od normalnih slučajeva svjedočenja zbog kojih epistemička vrijednost takvih iskaza postaje dvojbena. Temeljem Coadyjeve analize komunikacijskih akata pokušale smo identificirati uvjete ne-patološkog svjedočanstva kako bismo propitale može li se fikcija smatrati svjedočanstvom. U članku argumentiramo u prilog stava da je moguće govoriti o fikcijskom svjedočanstvu jer praksa fikcije ne krši postavljene uvjete epistemičke odgovornosti govornika/autora; proizvodi epistemičku korist za čitatelja koja predstavlja legitimni (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Snjezana Prijic-Samarzija & Iris Vidmar (2012). Fictional Testimony. Prolegomena 11 (1):65-82.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2011). Contraception: Natural, Artificial, Moral. Filozofska Istrazivanja 31 (2):277-290.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2011). Kontracepcija: prirodno, umjetno, moralno. Filozofska Istrazivanja 31 (2):277-290.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2009). Bioethical Issues and Sorites Paradox. Synthesis Philosophica 23 (2):203-213.
    The main purpose of this article is an analysis of the Continuity Argument, one of the most influential arguments upon which the moral condemnation of scientific and medical practices such as embryo research and experimentation, assisted reproduction, abortion, therapeutic cloning, etc. are based. I have firstly given a very brief account of the approach that attributes the status of marker event to fertilization, identifying the Continuity Argument between other argumentation. Further, I have tried to distinguish the three possible interpretations of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2009). Bioetički predmeti i paradoks sorita. Synthesis Philosophica 23 (2):203-213.
    Glavna je svrha ovoga članka analizati Argument kontinuiteta, jedan od najutjecajnijih argumenata na kojemu su utemeljeni moralna osuda znanstvenih i medicinskih praksi poput istraživanja i eksperimenata s embrijem, potpomognuta reprodukcije, pobačaja, terapeutskog kloniranja, itd. Prvo se daje vrlo kratko objašnjenje pristupa koji pripisuje status markirajućeg događaja fertilizaciji, identificirajući Argument kontinuiteta među drugim argumentacijama. Nadalje, pokušava se razdvojiti tri moguće interpretacije pojma kontinuiteta pretpostavljenog u Argumentu kontinuiteta, te izdvojiti najuvjerljiviju filozofsku i znanstvenu interpretaciju postfertilizacijskog kontinuiteta. Naposljetku, tvrdim da iz filozofski i (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2009). Bioethische Themen und das Sorites-Paradoxon. Synthesis Philosophica 23 (2):203-213.
    Das Hauptanliegen dieses Artikels ist, dem Argument der Kontinuität nachzugehen, weil es eines der einflussreichsten Argumente ist, auf denen die moralische Verwerfung von wissenschaftlichen und methodischen Praxen beruht. Zu diesen werden z.B. die Embryonenforschung, Experimente an Embryonen, die assistierte Reproduktion, die Abtreibung, das Klonen zu therapeutischen Zwecken u.a. gezählt. Zunächst wird eine sehr kurze Erklärung des Ansatzes gegeben, der der Fertilisation den Status eines einschneidenden Ereignisses einräumt, indem das Argument der Kontinuität als eines unter vielen identifiziert wird. Weiterhin wird versucht, (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2009). Les questions bioéthiques et le paradoxe des sorites. Synthesis Philosophica 23 (2):203-213.
    Le présent article a pour objectif d’analyser l’Argument de la continuité, qui est l’un des arguments les plus influents sur lequel repose la condamnation morale des pratiques scientifiques et médicales, telles que les recherches et les expérimentations sur les embryons, la reproduction assistée, l’avortement, le clonage thérapeutique, etc. D’abord sera donnée une brève explication de l’approche qui attribue le statut d’un événement marquant à la fertilisation, en identifiant l’Argument de la continuité parmi d’autres argumentations. En second lieu, je vais essayer (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2008). Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa (Eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 22:161-166.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Snježana Prijic-Samaržija (2008). The Epistemology of Testimony. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):161-166.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2007). Evidentialism and Trust. Filozofska Istrazivanja 27 (3):671-683.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2007). Evidencijalizam i povjerenje. Filozofska Istrazivanja 27 (3):671-683.
    Temeljni je cilj ovog rada primjena općenite ideje evidencijalizma na poseban slučaj svjedočanstva i povjerenja koje određujem kao postupak prihvaćanja iskaza drugih ljudi. U prvom dijelu, zagovaram poziciju evidencijalizma u pogledu povjerenja, odnosno stav da je epistemički odgovorno povjerenje stvar posjedovanja odgovarajuće evidencije ili epistemičkih razloga. U drugom dijelu, razmatram primjedbe koje mogu biti upućene ovoj poziciji od strane anti redukcionista i nihilista. Konačno, u trećem dijelu nastojim braniti evidencijalizam protiv upućenih kritika, te predlažem kriterij primjerene evidencije za epistemički odgovorno (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2007). Iris Marion Young, Pravednost I Politika Razlike. Prolegomena 6 (1):126-131.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Snjezana Prijic-Samarzija (2007). Trust and Contextualism. Acta Analytica 22 (2):125-138.
    The objective of this paper is to apply the general idea of contextualism, as a theory of knowledge attribution, to the very specific case of testimony and trust characterized as being the procedure of the attribution of knowledge (and sincerity) to the informant. In the first part, I argue in favor of evidentialism, a viewpoint that takes epistemically responsible trust as a matter of evidence. In the second part, I consider the question of how strong an evidential basis has to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2005). Preface. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):387-387.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2004). Preface. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2004). Pierre Jacob and Marc Jannerod, Ways of Seeing: The Scope and Limits of Visual Cognition. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11:305-309.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Snjezana Prijic-Samarzija (2004). Some Epistemological Consequences of the Dual-Aspect Theory of Visual Perception. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (11):273-290.
    Seeking whether our perception produces knowledge which is not only relative or subjective perspective on things, is to be engaged in the realist/anti-realist debate regarding perception. In this article I pursue the naturalistic approach according to which the question whether perception delivers objective knowledge about the external world is inseparable from empirical investigation into mechanisms of perception. More precisely, I have focused on the dual aspect theory of perception, one of the most influential recent theories of perception which unifies two (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2004). Some Epistemological Consequences of The Dual-Aspect Theory of Visual Perception. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):273-290.
    Seeking whether our perception produces knowledge which is not only relative or subjective perspective on things, is to be engaged in the realist/anti-realist debate regarding perception. In this article I pursue the naturalistic approach according to which the question whether perception delivers objective knowledge about the external world is inseparable from empirical investigation into mechanisms of perception. More precisely, I have focused on the dual aspect theory of perception, one of the most influential recent theories of perception which unifies two (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2004). Ways of Seeing. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):305-309.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2003). Bioetica: Analisi Filosofiche Liberali. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):99-102.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2003). Elvio Baccarini, Bioetica: Analisi Filosofiche Liberali (Bioethics: The Liberal Philosophical Analysis). Croatian Journal of Philosophy 7:99-102.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2003). Trust-Between the Disposition to Cooperation and Evidence. Logic and Philosophy of Science 1:1.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Snjezana Prijic-Samarzija (2002). Fiducia e cooperazione. Filosofia Oggi 7 (2):31.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (2001). Trust and Epistemic Cooperation. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):147-157.
    In this paper, I defend a certain moderate version of Humean evidentialism against a Reidian non-evidentialist’s position. My proposal of cooperative viewpoint of trust is based on the following theses: (i) epistemic cooperation is a necessary condition for us to attain knowledge (because of the scope and complexity of the task, capacity inequalities and background information, etc.), (ii) any form of cooperative activity, including division of labor, requires that cooperators trust one another, (iii) in contrast to Reidian non-evidentialism, justified trust (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (1997). Abortion and Responsibility. Acta Analytica 18:161-174.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation