Search results for 'Social sciences Methodology' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Mark J. Smith (ed.) (2005). Philosophy & Methodology of the Social Sciences. Sage.
    This is a comprehensive and authoritative reference collection in the philosophy and methodology of the social sciences. The source materials selected are drawn from debates within the natural sciences as well as social scientific practice. This four volume set covers the traditional literature on the philosophy of the social sciences, and the contemporary philosophical and methodological debates developing at the heart of the disciplinary and interdisciplinary groups in the social sciences. It (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  4
    Barry Hindess (1977). Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences. Harvester Press.
  3. S. I. Benn & G. W. Mortimore (eds.) (1976). Rationality and the Social Sciences: Contributions to the Philosophy and Methodology of the Social Sciences. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  4.  75
    Thomas Eberle (2010). The Phenomenological Life-World Analysis and the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Human Studies 33 (2):123-139.
    This Alfred Schutz Memorial Lecture discusses the relationship between the phenomenological life-world analysis and the methodology of the social sciences, which was the central motive of Schutz’s work. I have set two major goals in this lecture. The first is to scrutinize the postulate of adequacy, as this postulate is the most crucial of Schutz’s methodological postulates. Max Weber devised the postulate ‘adequacy of meaning’ in analogy to the postulate of ‘causal adequacy’ (a concept used in jurisprudence) (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  5.  8
    Rmj Oduor (2010). Research Methodology in Philosophy Within an Interdisciplinary and Commercialised African Context: Guarding Against Undue Influence From the Social Sciences. Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 2 (1):87-118.
    This paper argues that despite pressures to conform to the research methodology of the social sciences, African philosophers must diligently work for the preservation of the distinct character of philosophy as a discipline. To do this, they will have to move away from the debate on the existence and nature of African philosophy, and focus their efforts on the quest for a criterion by which to distinguish philosophical works from non-philosophical ones, regardless of where the works hail (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  4
    Jane Azevedo (1997). Mapping Reality: An Evolutionary Realist Methodology for the Natural and Social Sciences. State University of New York Press.
    Using the insights of evolutionary epistemology, the author develops a new naturalist realist methodology of science, and applies it to the conceptual, practical, and ethical problems of the social sciences.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  1
    Felix Kaufmann (1944). Methodology of the Social Sciences. Journal of Philosophy 41 (22):604-612.
  8.  6
    Robert S. Cohen & Marx W. Wartofsky (1985). Epistemology, Methodology and the Social Sciences. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 47 (1):157-157.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. J. Mouton (1988). The Methodology and Philosophy of the Social Sciences: A Selective Bibliography of Anthologies, 1950-1985. Human Sciences Research Council.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  51
    P. A. Roth (1989). A Rationalist Methodology for the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19 (1):104-108.
  11.  23
    Paul Lewis (2010). Certainly Not! A Critical Realist Recasting of Ludwig von Mises's Methodology of the Social Sciences. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (3):277-299.
    This paper focuses on Ludwig von Mises methodological apriorism. It uses Wittgenstein's private language argument as the basis for a critique of Mises's claim to have found apodictically certain foundations for economic analysis. It is argued instead that Mises's methodology is more fruitfully viewed as an exercise in social ontology, the objective of which is to outline key features of the socio-economic world that social scientific research ought to take into account if it is to be fruitful. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  1
    T. E. Huff (1982). On the Methodology of the Social Sciences: A Review Essay Part III. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12 (2):205-219.
  13.  1
    T. E. Huff (1981). On the Methodology of the Social Sciences: A Review Essay Part I. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (4):461-475.
  14.  2
    S. W. Gaukroger (1979). Book Reviews : Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences. By Barry Hndess. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1977. Pp. 258. $17.75. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (3):379-382.
  15. Stephen W. Gaukroger (1979). Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences" by Barry Hindess. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (3):379.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. T. E. Huff (1982). On the Methodology of the Social Sciences: A Review Essay Part II. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12 (1):81-94.
  17. Paul A. Roth (1989). "A Rationalist Methodology for the Social Sciences" by D. Sylvan and B. Glassner. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19 (1):104.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Herold S. Stern (1962). Implications of the Methodology of the Physical Sciences for the Social Sciences. Dialectica 16 (3):255-274.
    The attempt of modern social science to follow the methods of the physical sciences in seeking verification of its theories by statistical techniques is a result of an outmoded view of the methods of the physicist. The decisive element in verifying a theory is not the amassing of large bodies of data but insightful judgment into a relatively few cases. Because the will is primary in scientific activity, scientific statements, particularly those of social science, have the same (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  17
    Simon V. Glynn (2014). Alfred Schutz, the Epistemology and Methodology of the Human and Social Sciences, and the Subjective Foundations of Objectivity. Schutzian Research 6:61-74.
    Long debated has been whether or not the “objectivistic” epistemologies, quantitative methods and causal explanations, developed by the natural sciences for the study of physical objects, their actions and interactions, might also be applied to the study of human subjects, their experiences, actions and social interactions. Pointing out that such supposedly objective approaches would be singularly inappropriate to the study of the significance or meanings, qualitative values and freedom of choice, widely regarded as essential aspects of human subjects, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  58
    Donald Thomas Campbell (1988). Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science: Selected Papers. University of Chicago Press.
    Since the 1950s, Donald T. Campbell has been one of the most influential contributors to the methodology of the social sciences. A distinguished psychologist, he has published scores of widely cited journal articles, and two awards, in social psychology and in public policy, have been named in his honor. This book is the first to collect his most significant papers, and it demonstrates the breadth and originality of his work.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  21. Koshy Tharakan (2006). Methodology of Social Sciences: Positivism, Anti-Positivism and the Phenomenological Mediation. Indian Journal of Social Work 67 (1):16-31.
  22.  32
    Osmo Kivinen & Tero Piiroinen (2007). Sociologizing Metaphysics and Mind: A Pragmatist Point of View on the Methodology of the Social Sciences. [REVIEW] Human Studies 30 (2):97 - 114.
    There are realist philosophers and social scientists who believe in the indispensability of social ontology. However, we argue that certain pragmatist outlines for inquiry open more fruitful roads to empirical research than such ontologizing perspectives. The pragmatist conceptual tools in a Darwinian vein—concepts like action, habit, coping and community—are in a particularly stark contrast with, for instance, the Searlean and Chomskian metaphysics of human being. In particular, we bring Searle's realist philosophy of society and mind under critical survey (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  23. Felix Kaufmann (forthcoming). The Significance of Methodology for the Social Sciences (Part II). Social Research.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  13
    N. E. (1951). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):25-25.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  15
    Joseph T. Clark (1945). Methodology of the Social Sciences. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):185-188.
  26.  9
    Morton G. White (1944). Methodology of the Social Sciences. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 41 (22):604-612.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  1
    Fritz Machlup (1981). Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (1):135-137.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  28.  37
    Andrew Sayer (2007). Critical Realist Methodology: A View From Sweden. Review of Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences by Berth Danermark, Mats Engström, Liselotte Jakobsen and Jan Ch. Karlsson. Journal of Critical Realism 1 (1):168-170.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  5
    Franz H. Mueller (1945). Methodology of the Social Sciences. Modern Schoolman 23 (1):44-46.
  30.  7
    Paul Hanly Furfey (1945). Methodology of the Social Sciences. New Scholasticism 19 (3):251-253.
  31.  5
    Nenad Cekić (1993). Popper's Criticism of Methodology of Social Sciences. Theoria 36 (2):21-48.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  15
    Bjorn Wittrock & Tom R. Burns (1986). The Theory and Methodology Programme of the Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences. Sociological Theory 4 (2):205-207.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  6
    Alex C. Michalos (1985). Book Review:Epistemology, Methodology, and the Social Sciences Robert S. Cohen, Marx W. Wartofsky. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 52 (1):170-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. I. L. Horowitz (2000). Max Weber's Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences. By Fritz Ringer. The European Legacy 5 (3):454-455.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  6
    Bob Jessop (2003). Max Weber's Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences FRITZ K. RINGER. Historical Materialism 11 (2):265-272.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  3
    John G. McEvoy (1979). Book Review:Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences Barry Hindess. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 46 (3):496-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Joseph Bien (1981). Fritz Machlup's "Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences". [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (1):135.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. V. Cernik (1999). Humanistic Interpretation (Basic Methodology in Social Sciences). Filozofia 54 (9):641-650.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. M. Havelka (1986). A Critique of Neohistoricism in Contemporary West-German Bourgeois Methodology of the Social-Sciences. Filosoficky Casopis 34 (1):74-89.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. A. E. Heath (1930). Some Notes on Methodology in the Social Sciences. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 31:263 - 284.
  41. A. E. Heath (1931). XIII.—Some Notes on Methodology in the Social Sciences. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 31 (1):263-284.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Susan James (1978). Barry Hindess, "Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences". [REVIEW] History and Theory 17 (3):336.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Z. Javurek (1985). A Critique of the Neoliberal and Neoconservative Concept of Objectivity in the Methodology of the Social-Sciences. Filosoficky Casopis 33 (6):827-844.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Richard Mattessich (1978). Instrumental Reasoning and Systems Methodology an Epistemology of the Applied and Social Sciences.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Mcgill Mcgill (1945). Aufmann's Methodology of the Social Sciences. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6:632.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. S. Mesure (2003). Individuals and Ensembles in Dilthey's Methodology of Social Sciences. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 57 (226):393-406.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Ahmad A. N. Neaz (2012). Ethical Dilemma and Research Methodology of Social Sciences. Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 1 (1).
  48. P. Thomas (1978). Books in Review : Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences by Barry Hindess. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Human Ities Press, 1977 and Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press, 1977. Pp. 258. $17.75. [REVIEW] Political Theory 6 (2):253-256.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Mario Bunge (1986). Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol. 7 : Epistemology and Methodology, III : « Philosophy of Science and Technology », Part I : « Formal and Physical Sciences », Part II : « Life Science, Social Science and Technology ». Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 176 (3):389-393.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  11
    Geoffrey Hawthorn (1991). Plausible Worlds: Possibility and Understanding in History and the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
    Possibilities haunt history. The force of our explanations of events turns on the alternative possibilities those explanations suggest. It is these possible worlds that give us our understanding ; and in human affairs, we decide them by practical rather than theoretical judgment. In this widely acclaimed account of the role of counterfactuals in explanation, Geoffrey Hawthorn deploys extended examples to defend his argument. His conclusions cast doubt on existing assumptions about the nature and place of theory, and indeed of the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000