Search results for 'Space of reasons' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  3
    Lesbian Productions Of Space (1996). Gay (Ze) Doesn't Reciprocate'the Look', Rather a Lesbian Reading is Imposed Upon Her, More in Hope Than Anticipation. But the Voyeur Can Still Momentarily Imagine the Space as Her Own, Producing a Small Fissure in Hegemonic Hetero-Sexual Space. Lesbian Spaces Are Also Mobilized Through Linguistic Structures of Meaning. [REVIEW] In Nancy Duncan (ed.), Bodyspace: Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality. Routledge
  2. T. H. Ho (2014). Naturalism and the Space of Reasons in Mind and World. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (1):49-62.
    This paper aims to show that many criticisms of McDowell’s naturalism of second nature are based on what I call ‘the orthodox interpretation’ of McDowell’s naturalism. The orthodox interpretation is, however, a misinterpretation, which results from the fact that the phrase ‘the space of reasons’ is used equivocally by McDowell in Mind and World. Failing to distinguish two senses of ‘the space of reasons’, I argue that the orthodox interpretation renders McDowell’s naturalism inconsistent with McDowell’s (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Matthew Congdon (2015). Epistemic Injustice in the Space of Reasons. Episteme 12 (1):75-93.
    In this paper, I make explicit some implicit commitments to realism and conceptualism in recent work in social epistemology exemplified by Miranda Fricker and Charles Mills. I offer a survey of recent writings at the intersection of social epistemology, feminism, and critical race theory, showing that commitments to realism and conceptualism are at once implied yet undertheorized in the existing literature. I go on to offer an explicit defense of these commitments by drawing from the epistemological framework of John McDowell, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Susan L. Hurley (2003). Animal Action in the Space of Reasons. Mind and Language 18 (3):231-256.
    I defend the view that we should not overintellectualize the mind. Nonhuman animals can occupy islands of practical rationality: they can have contextbound reasons for action even though they lack full conceptual abilities. Holism and the possibility of mistake are required for such reasons to be the agent's reasons, but these requirements can be met in the absence of inferential promiscuity. Empirical work with animals is used to illustrate the possibility that reasons for action could be (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  5.  44
    James R. O'Shea (2011). Normativity and Scientific Naturalism in Sellars' 'Janus-Faced' Space of Reasons. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (3):459-471.
    The thought of Wilfrid Sellars has figured prominently in recent discussions of the relationship between naturalism and normativity . On the one hand, some have appealed to Sellars' philosophy in defence of the thesis that what he called the normative 'space of reasons' is in some sense sui generis and irreducible to the natural causal order described by the natural sciences. On the other hand, others have exploited equally central aspects of Sellars' philosophy in defence of the seemingly (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  62
    Bill Pollard (2005). Naturalizing the Space of Reasons. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (1):69 – 82.
    Given the Sellarsian distinction between the space of causes and the space of reasons, the naturalist seeks to articulate how these two spaces are unproblematically related. In Mind and World (1996) John McDowell suggests that such a naturalism can be achieved by pointing out that we work our way into the space of reasons by the process of upbringing he calls Bildung. 'The resulting habits of thought and action', writes McDowell, 'are second nature' (p. 84). (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  38
    Annamaria Carusi (2009). Implicit Trust in the Space of Reasons. Journal of Social Epistemology 23 (1):25-43.
    Pila (2009) has criticised the recommendations made by requirements engineers involved in the design of a grid technology for the support of distributed readings of mammograms made by Jirotka et al. (2005). The disagreement between them turns on the notion of “biographical familiarity” and whether it can be a sound basis for trust for the performances of professionals such as radiologists. In the first two sections, this paper gives an interpretation of the position of each side in this disagreement and (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  12
    Xiang Huang (2008). Situating Default Position Inside the Space of Reasons. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:85-95.
    Epistemology of testimony’s map has been charted by identifying the basic controversy between reductionism and non-reductions. John McDowell’s article “Knowledge by Hearsay” (1993/1998) has been taken as a clear example of non-reductionism. This is, however, only partially right. It is correct that, as a non-reductionist, he defends the justifying role that the default position plays in testimonial knowledge. But, his insistence on situating the default position inside the space of reasons suggests that default position should be understood as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  98
    David Simpson (2014). Wittgenstein and Stage-Setting: Being Brought Into the Space of Reasons. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (6):1-16.
    Wittgenstein constantly invokes teaching, training and learning in his later work. It is therefore interesting to consider what role these notions play for him there. I argue that their use is central to Wittgenstein’s attempt to refute cognitivist assumptions, and to show how normative practices can be understood without the threat of circularity, grounded not in a kind of seeing, but in doing, and the natural reactions of an organism. This can generate a worry that Wittgenstein’s position is quietist and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  31
    James R. O'Shea (2011). Introduction: Naturalism, Normativity, and the Space of Reasons. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (3):313-315.
    (2010). Introduction: Naturalism, Normativity, and the Space of Reasons. International Journal of Philosophical Studies: Vol. 18, Naturalism, Normativity, and the Space of Reasons, pp. 313-315. doi: 10.1080/09672559.2010.494434.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  21
    David Davies (1999). Living in the “Space of Reasons”: The “Rationality Debate” Revisited. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (3):231 – 244.
    Two questions are central to the “rationality debate” in the philosophy of social science. First, should we acknowledge differences in basic norms of epistemic and agential rationality, or in the content of perceptual experience, as the “best explanation” of radical differences in belief and practice? Second, can genuine understanding be achieved between cultures and research traditions that so differ in their beliefs and practices? I survey a number of responses to these questions, and suggest that one of these, “dialogical optimism”, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Mark Owen Webb (2007). Meeting Others in the Space of Reasons: Fallibilism for Sellarsians. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 92 (1):217-231.
    Certainty has proved to be a troublesome epistemological concept, which motivates many philosophers to be fallibilists. But fallibilism proves troublesome, too, as it is hard to state in a way that does not either imply skepticism, or deny that there are necessary truths. The Sellarsian idea of a space of reasons in which there are normative proprieties attached to epistemic positions allows for an understanding of fallibilism which allows that there is knowledge, there are necessary truths, and yet (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  31
    Ram Neta (2009). Mature Human Knowledge as a Standing in the Space of Reasons. Philosophical Topics 37 (1):115-132.
    This quoted passage makes a negative claim – a claim about what we are not doing when we characterize an episode or state as that of knowing – and it also makes a positive claim – a claim about what we are doing when we characterize an episode or state as that of knowing. Although McDowell has not endorsed the negative claim, he has repeatedly and explicitly endorsed the positive claim, i.e., that “in characterizing an episode or a state as (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14.  14
    Adrian Haddock, Extending the Space of Reasons: Comments on Chapter Four of Understanding People.
    Wilfrid Sellars employs the metaphor of the space of reasons to express a certain conception of knowledge: “in characterising an episode or state as that of knowing … one is placing it in the logical space of reasons, of justifying and being able to justify what one says”.1 A growing number of philosophers employ the same metaphor to express a conception of at least some (other) mental states: in characterising a state as that of belief, or (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  1
    Christopher W. Tindale (2011). Out of the Space of Reasons: Argumentation, Agents, and Persons. Pragmatics and Cognition 19 (3):383-398.
    The paper investigates the `logical space of reasons' as a social space in which rational agents operate and persons in an important sense come to be. Building from an investigation of argumentative agents in Aristotle's Rhetoric, I discuss both interior and exterior criteria for personhood and propose that the latter shows how argumentation, as a principal activity of the space of reasons, results in the particular kinds of persons we recognize there as rational agents. The (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  11
    Chris Hanks (2008). Indoctrination and the Space of Reasons. Educational Theory 58 (2):193-212.
    The “paradox of indoctrination” has proven to be a persistent problem in discussions of the cultivation of autonomy through education. In short, if indoctrination means instilling beliefs without reasons, and if children lack the rational capacity to evaluate reasons, how can that capacity be cultivated without indoctrination? Some educational theorists have relied on a transcendental justification of rational autonomy that avoids indoctrination, while others have accepted that some indoctrination is inevitable, focusing instead on defending acceptable forms of indoctrination. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  2
    Annamaria Carusi, Implicit Trust in the Space of Reasons and Implications for Technology Design: A Response to Justine Pila: Implicit Trust in the Space of Reasons: A Response to Justine Pila.
    In a recent paper, Pila has criticised the recommendations made by requirements engineers involved in the design of a grid technology for the support of distributed readings of mammograms made by Jirotka et al . The disagreement between them turns on the notion of ‘biographical familiarity’ and whether it can be a sound basis for trust for the performances of professionals such as radiologists. In the first two sections, the paper gives an interpretation of the position of each side in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  8
    Annamaria Carusi (2009). Implicit Trust in the Space of Reasons and Implications for Technology Design: A Response to Justine Pila. Social Epistemology 23 (1):25-43.
    In this issue, Pila (2009) has criticised the recommendations made by requirements engineers involved in the design of a grid technology for the support of distributed readings of mammograms made by Jirotka et al. (2005). The disagreement between them turns on the notion of “biographical familiarity” and whether it can be a sound basis for trust for the performances of professionals such as radiologists. In the first two sections, this paper gives an interpretation of the position of each side in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Benedict Smith (2010). Particularism and the Space of Moral Reasons. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Machine generated contents note: Introduction -- Moral Philosophy and Experience -- Moral Particularism -- Perception and The Myth of the Moral Given -- Moral Judgement -- Moral Phenomenology -- The Space of Moral Reasons -- Conclusion -- Index.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  20. Richard Heck (2000). Nonconceptual Content and the "Space of Reasons". Philosophical Review 109 (4):483-523.
    In Mind and World, John McDowell argues against the view that perceptual representation is non-conceptual. The central worry is that this view cannot offer any reasonable account of how perception bears rationally upon belief. I argue that this worry, though sensible, can be met, if we are clear that perceptual representation is, though non-conceptual, still in some sense 'assertoric': Perception, like belief, represents things as being thus and so.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   80 citations  
  21.  20
    Kim Sterelny (2003). Charting Control-Space: Comments on Susan Hurley's Animal Action in the Space of Reasons. Mind and Language 18 (3):257-265.
    Hurley is right to reject the dichotomy between intentional agents and mere stimulus/response habit machines, and she is also right in thinking that it is important to map the space of systems for the adaptive control of behaviour. So there is much in this paper with which I agree. My disagreement concerns folk psychology. Hurley thinks that control space can be charted by asking whether and to what extent animals are intentional agents. In contrast, I doubt (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  14
    Kenneth R. Westphal (2015). Conventionalism and the Impoverishment of the Space of Reasons: Carnap, Quine and Sellars. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 3 (8).
    This article examines how Quine and Sellars develop informatively contrasting responses to a fundamental tension in Carnap’s semantics ca. 1950. Quine’s philosophy could well be styled ‘Essays in Radical Empiricism’; his assay of radical empiricism is invaluable for what it reveals about the inherent limits of empiricism. Careful examination shows that Quine’s criticism of Carnap’s semantics in ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ fails, that at its core Quine’s semantics is for two key reasons incoherent and that his hallmark Thesis of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  57
    J. Campbell (1999). Schizophrenia, the Space of Reasons and Thinking as a Motor Process. The Monist 82 (4):609-625.
  24.  82
    Wilfrid Sellars (2007). In the Space of Reasons: Selected Essays of Wilfrid Sellars. Harvard University Press.
    Inference and meaning -- Some reflections on language games -- Language as thought and as communication -- Meaning as functional classification : a perspective on the relation of syntax to semantics -- Naming and saying -- Grammar and existence : a preface to ontology -- Abstract entities -- Being and being known -- The lever of Archimedes -- Some reflections on thoughts and things -- Mental events -- Phenomenalism -- The identity approach to the mind-body problem -- Philosophy and the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  25. Eva Erman (2011). Freedom as Non-Domination or How to Throw the Agent Out of the Space of Reasons. Journal of Power 3 (1).
    This paper analyzes agency in Pettit’s republican conception of freedom. By understanding freedom intersubjectively in terms of agency, Pettit makes an important contribution to the contemporary debate on negative liberty. At the same time, some of the presumptions about agency are problematic. The paper defends the thesis that Pettit is not able to provide the sufficient conditions for freedom as non-domination that he sets out to do. In order to show why this is the case and how we can address (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  7
    Svend Brinkmann (2006). Mental Life in the Space of Reasons. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 36 (1):1–16.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  27. Hamid Vahid (2008). Experience and the Space of Reasons: The Problem of Non-Doxastic Justification. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 69 (3):295 - 313.
    It is not difficult to make sense of the idea that beliefs may derive their justification from other beliefs. Difficulties surface when, as in certain epistemological theories, one appeals to sensory experiences to give an account of the structure of justification. This gives rise to the so-called problem of ‘nondoxastic justification’, namely, the problem of seeing how sensory experiences can confer justification on the beliefs they give rise to. In this paper, I begin by criticizing a number of theories that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. Johannes Roessler (2011). Perceptual Attention and the Space of Reasons. In Christopher Mole, Declan Smithies & Wayne Wu (eds.), Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford University Press 274.
  29.  36
    Peter Godfrey-Smith (2003). Folk Psychology Under Stress: Comments on Susan Hurley's Animal Action in the Space of Reasons. Mind and Language 18 (3):266-272.
    My commentary on Hurley is concerned with foundational issues. Hurley's investigation of animal cognition is cast within a particular framework—basically, a philosophically refined version of folk psychology. Her discussion has a complicated relationship to unresolved debates about the nature and status of folk psychology, especially debates about the extent to which folk psychological categories are aimed at picking out features of the causal organization of the mind.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  30.  57
    Maura Tumulty (2008). Diminished Rationality and the Space of Reasons. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):pp. 601-629.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  3
    Willem A. Devries (2008). In the Space of Reasons: Selected Essays of Wilfrid Sellars. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 61 (4):860-862.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  15
    Willem A. deVries (2008). In the Space of Reasons. Review of Metaphysics 61 (4):860-862.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  17
    Scott F. Aikin (2008). In the Space of Reasons: Selected Essays of Wilfrid Sellars (Review). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 363-367.
  34.  1
    Jesús Vega Encabo (2006). Appearances and Disjunctions: Empirical Authority in McDowell's Space of Reasons. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):63-81.
  35. Scott Aikin (2008). Kevin Scharp and Robert Brandom, Eds., In the Space of Reasons: Selected Essays of Wilfrid Sellars. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):363-366.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Jennifer Church (2006). Locating the Space of Reasons. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):85-96.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Jes Vega Encabo (2006). Appearances and Disjunctions: Empirical Authority in McDowell's Space of Reasons. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):63-81.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  59
    Robert Brandom (1995). Review: Knowledge and the Social Articulation of the Space of Reasons. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (4):895--908.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  39.  17
    Richard G. Heck Jr (2000). Nonconceptual Content and the "Space of Reasons". Philosophical Review 109 (4):483 - 523.
  40.  2
    Heck Jr (2000). Nonconceptua1 Content and the" Space of Reasons," RICHARD G. Philosophical Review 109 (4).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  41.  7
    Matthew Congdon (2015). Epistemic Injustice in the Space of Reasons – Erratum. Episteme 12 (3):427.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  66
    Greg Restall, Rebecca Kukla & Mark Lance, Appendix to Rebecca Kukla and Mark Lance 'Yo!' And 'Lo!': The Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  61
    Susan L. Hurley, The Space of Reasons Vs. The Space of Inference: Reply to Noe.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  21
    Peter Dews (2008). Intersubjectivity and the “Space of Reasons”: Fichte in the Post-Analytic Context. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 29 (1):133-159.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  21
    Patricia Hanna (2009). Review of Rebecca Kukla, Mark Lance, 'Yo!' And 'Lo!': The Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Fultner Barbara (2001). Intersubjectivity in the Space of Reasons. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (1).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Robert B. Brandom (2001). Intersubjectivity in the Space of Reasons. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (1):107-114.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Karim Dharamsi (2009). Review of “In the Space of Reasons: Selected Essays of Wilfrid Sellars”. [REVIEW] Essays in Philosophy 10 (1):11.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Eva Erman (2014). Legitimacy in the Global Normative Order: Moral, Political and Democratic Justificatory Practices in the Space of Reasons. In S. Gupta (ed.), Politics in the Global Age: Critical Reflections on Cosmopolitanism. Routledge
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Raffaela Giovagnoli (2005). Intentionality and the" Social" Space of Reasons. Epistemologia 28 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000