1.  10
    Stacey A. Tovino (2007). Functional Neuroimaging and the Law: Trends and Directions for Future Scholarship. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):44 – 56.
    Under the umbrella of the burgeoning neurotransdisciplines, scholars are using the principles and research methodologies of their primary and secondary fields to examine developments in neuroimaging, neuromodulation and psychopharmacology. The path for advanced scholarship at the intersection of law and neuroscience may clear if work across the disciplines is collected and reviewed and outstanding and debated issues are identified and clarified. In this article, I organize, examine and refine a narrow class of the burgeoning neurotransdiscipline scholarship; that is, scholarship at (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  2.  21
    Stacey A. Tovino (2008). The Impact of Neuroscience on Health Law. Neuroethics 1 (2):101-117.
    Advances in neuroscience have implications for criminal law as well as civil and regulatory law, including health, disability, and benefit law. The role of the behavioral and brain sciences in health insurance claims, the mental health parity debate, and disability proceedings is examined.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  1
    Stacey A. Tovino (2005). The Confidentiality and Privacy Implications of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33 (4):844-850.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   2 citations