145 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Robert Stalnaker [99]Robert C. Stalnaker [20]Aaron Stalnaker [14]R. Stalnaker [4]
Nan Stalnaker [3]Aaron D. Stalnaker [1]R. C. Stalnaker [1]Luther Winfield Stalnaker [1]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

  1. Robert Stalnaker, Knowing Where We Are, and What It is Like.
  2. Robert C. Stalnaker, On Knowing Where You Are and What It's Like.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Rc Stalnaker (forthcoming). I968]:'A Theory of Conditionals'. Studies in Logical Theory (American Philosophical Quarterly Supplementary Monograph Series), Oxford.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Elizabeth M. Bucar & Aaron Stalnaker (2014). On Comparative Religious Ethics as a Field of Study. Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (2):358-384.
    This essay is a critical engagement with recent assessments of comparative religious ethics by John Kelsay and Jung Lee. Contra Kelsay's proposal to return to a neo-Weberian sociology of religious norm elaboration and justification, the authors argue that comparative religious ethics is and should be practiced as a field of study in active conversation with other fields that consider human flourishing, employing a variety of methods that have their roots in multiple disciplines. Cross-pollination from a variety of disciplines is a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Robert Stalnaker (2014). Context. Oup Oxford.
    Robert Stalnaker explores the contexts in which speech takes place, the ways we represent them, and the roles they play in explaining the interpretation and dynamics of speech. His central thesis is the autonomy of pragmatics: the independence of theory about structure and function of discourse from theory about mechanisms serving those functions.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Aaron Stalnaker (2013). Confucianism, Democracy, and the Virtue of Deference. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (4):441-459.
    Some democratic theorists have argued that contemporary people should practice only a civility that recognizes others as equal persons, and eschew any form of deference to authority as a feudalistic cultural holdover that ought to be abandoned in the modern era. Against such views, this essay engages early Confucian views of ethics and society, including their analyses of different sorts of authority and status, in order to argue that, properly understood, deference is indeed a virtue of considerable importance for contemporary (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Aaron Stalnaker (2013). Comparative Religious Ethics. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Robertc Stalnaker (2013). 7. Assertion. In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. 179.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Elizabeth M. Bucar & Aaron Stalnaker (eds.) (2012). Religious Ethics in a Time of Globalism: Shaping a Third Wave of Comparative Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Aaron Stalnaker (2012). Xunzi's Moral Analysis of War and Some of its Contemporary Implications. Journal of Military Ethics 11 (2):97-113.
    Abstract The early Ru or ?Confucian? figure Xunzi (?Master Xun,? c. 310?c. 220 BCE) gives a sophisticated analysis of war, which he develops on the basis of a larger social and political vision that he works out in considerable detail. This larger vision of human society is thoroughly normative in the sense that Xunzi both argues for the value of his ideal conception of society, and relates these moral arguments for the Confucian Dao or Way to what I take to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Robert Stalnaker (2012). Appendix A. Modeling Contingently Existing Propositions. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press. 136-138.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Robert Stalnaker (2012). Appendix B. Propositional Functions and Properties. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press. 139-148.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Robert Stalnaker (2012). Appendix C. A Model for a Mighty Language. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press. 149-153.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Robert Stalnaker (2012). Appendix D. Counterpart Semantics for the Cheap Haecceitist. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press. 154-156.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Robert Stalnaker (2012). Contents. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Robert Stalnaker (2012). 4. Disentangling Semantics From Metaphysics. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press. 89-125.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Robert Stalnaker (2012). Index. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press. 161-167.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Robert Stalnaker (2012). Intellectualism and the Objects of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (3):754-761.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Robert Stalnaker (2012). 2. Merely Possible Possible Worlds. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press. 22-51.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Robert Stalnaker (2012). 5. Modal Realism, Modal Rationalism, Modal Naturalism. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press. 126-135.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Robert Stalnaker (2012). 1. On What There Isn’T. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press. 1-21.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Robert Stalnaker (2012). Preface. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Robert Stalnaker (2012). References. In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press. 157-160.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Robert Stalnaker (2012). 3. What Is Haecceitism, and Is It True? In Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press. 52-88.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Robert Stalnaker (2011). Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press.
    The book also sheds new light on the nature of metaphysical theorizing by exploring the interaction of semantic and metaphysical issues, the connections between different metaphysical issues, and the nature of ontological commitment.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Robert Stalnaker (2011). Précis. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 155 (3):433-435.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Robert Stalnaker (2011). Responses to Stoljar, Weatherson and Boghossian. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 155 (3):467-479.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Robert Stalnaker (2011). The Essential Contextual. In Jessica Brown & Herman Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press. 137--151.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Robert Stalnaker (2011). The Metaphysical Conception of Analyticity. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):507-514.
  30. Aaron Stalnaker (2010). Virtue as Mastery in Early Confucianism. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):404-428.
    This essay explores the interrelation of skills and virtues. I first trace one line of analysis from Aristotle to Alasdair MacIntyre, which argues that there is a categorical difference between skills and virtues, in their ends and intrinsic character. This familiar distinction is fine in certain respects but still importantly misleading. Virtue in general, and also some particular virtues such as ritual propriety and practical wisdom, are not just exercised in practical contexts, but are in fact partially constituted by the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. R. Stalnaker (2010). Merely Possible Propositions. In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 21--32.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Robert Stalnaker (2010). Responses to Stanley and Schlenker. Philosophical Studies 151 (1):143 - 157.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. R. C. Stalnaker (2009). On Hawthorne and Magidor on Assertion, Context, and Epistemic Accessibility. Mind 118 (470):399-409.
    Hawthorne and Magidor's criticisms of the model of presupposition and assertion that I have used and defended are all based on a rejection of some transparency or introspection of assumptions about speaker presupposition. This response to those criticisms aims first to clarify, and then to defend, the required transparency assumptions. It is argued, first, that if the assumptions are properly understood, some prima facie problems for them do not apply, second, that rejecting the assumptions has intuitively implausible consequences, and third, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Robert Stalnaker (2009). Another Attempt to Put Sleeping Beauty to Rest. Canadian Joural of Philosophy 39 (Sup1):25-39.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Robert Stalnaker (2009). Conditional Propositions and Conditional Assertions. In Andy Egan & B. Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press.
  36. Robert Stalnaker (2009). Iterated Belief Revision. Erkenntnis 70 (2):189 - 209.
    This is a discussion of the problem of extending the basic AGM belief revision theory to iterated belief revision: the problem of formulating rules, not only for revising a basic belief state in response to potential new information, but also for revising one’s revision rules in response to potential new information. The emphasis in the paper is on foundational questions about the nature of and motivation for various constraints, and about the methodology of the evaluation of putative counterexamples to proposed (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Robert Stalnaker (2009). What is De Re Belief? In Joseph Almog & Paolo Leonardi (eds.), The Philosophy of David Kaplan. Oxford University Press. 233--245.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Michael Barnes, Francis X. Clooney, Olivier Dufault, Paula Fredriksen, Franklin T. Harkins, Paul J. Lachance, Leo Lefebure, Reid Locklin, C. C. Pecknold & Aaron Stalnaker (2008). Augustine and World Religions. Lexington Books.
    Despite Augustine's reputation as the father of Christian intolerance, one finds in his thought the surprising claim that within non-Christian writings there are 'some truths in regard even to the worship of the One God.' The essays here uncover provocative points of comparison and similarity between Christianity and other religions to further such an Augustinian dialogue.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Aaron Stalnaker (2008). Judging Others: History, Ethics, and the Purposes of Comparison. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
    The most interesting and perilous issue at present in comparative religious ethics is comparative ethical judgment—when and how to judge others, if at all. There are understandable historical and conceptual reasons for the current tendency to prefer descriptive over normative work in comparative religious ethics. However, judging those we study is inescapable—it can be suppressed or marginalized but not eliminated. Therefore, the real question is how to judge others (and ourselves) well, not whether to judge. Instead of bringing supposedly universal (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Aaron Stalnaker (2008). The Mencius-Xunzi Debate in Early Confucian Ethics. In Jeffrey L. Richey (ed.), Teaching Confucianism. Oxford University Press. 85.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Robert Stalnaker (2008). A Response to Abbott on Presupposition and Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5):539-544.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Robert Stalnaker (2008). Our Knowledge of the Internal World. Oxford University Press.
    Starting in the middle -- Epistemic possibilities and the knowledge argument -- Locating ourselves in the world -- Notes on models of self-locating belief -- Phenomenal and epistemic indistinguishability -- Acquaintance and essence -- Knowing what one is thinking -- After the fall.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Thomas Stalnaker & Geoffrey Schoenbaum (2008). E Pluribus Unum? A New Take on Addiction by Redish Et Al. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):459-459.
    Neuroscientists and psychologists have proposed a variety of well-supported theories to explain addiction. Many of these theories suggest that addiction results from a single process or dysfunction across all of its forms. The authors of the current review, in contrast, have used a well-defined theoretical account of decision-making to outline the variety of dysfunctions that could account for addictive behavior.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Robert Stalnaker (2007). Critical Notice of Scott Soames's Case Against Two-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Review 116 (2):251-266.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Robert Stalnaker (2007). Responses. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 133 (3):481 - 491.
  46. Robert Stalnaker (2007). Review: Responses. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 133 (3):481 - 491.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Robert Stalnaker (2007). Stalnaker on Zombies. Philosophical Studies 133 (3):481-491.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Robert Stalnaker (2007). Ways a World Might Be. Philosophical Studies 133 (3):439 - 441.
    Robert Stalnaker is an actualist who holds that merely possible worlds are uninstantiated properties that might have been instantiated. Stalnaker also holds that there are no metaphysically impossible worlds: uninstantiated properties that couldn't have been instantiated. These views motivate Stalnaker's "two dimensional" account of the necessary a posteriori on which there is no single proposition that is both necessary and a posteriori. For a necessary proposition is true in all possible worlds. If there were necessary a posteriori propositions, that would (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Robert Stalnaker (2006). Assertion Revisited: On the Interpretation of Two-Dimensional Modal Semantics. In Garc (ed.), Philosophical Studies. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 293-309.
    This paper concerns the applications of two-dimensional modal semantics to the explanation of the contents of speech and thought. Different interpretations and applications of the apparatus are contrasted. First, it is argued that David Kaplan's two-dimensional semantics for indexical expressions is different from the use that I made of a formally similar framework to represent the role of contingent information in the determination of what is said. But the two applications are complementary rather than conflicting. Second, my interpretation of the (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Robert Stalnaker (2006). On Logics of Knowledge and Belief. Philosophical Studies 128 (1):169 - 199.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 145