6 found
Sort by:
  1. Violence Against Women, Stanley G. French & Wanda Teays (2002). University Press, 1996. 302 Pp. Who Goes First: The Story of Self-Experimentation in Medicine by Lawrence K. Altman. Revised Edition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. 454 Pp. $17.95. A Chosen Death: The Dying Confront Assisted Suicide by Lonny. [REVIEW] Bioethics 12 (4):1998.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Stanley G. French (1967). Kant's Constitutive-Regulative Distinction. The Monist 51 (4):623-639.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stanley G. French (1967). The Existence of God. A Reader Edited and with an Introduction by John Hick. Toronto: Collier-Macmillan, 1964. Pp. Xiv, 305. $2.25.Body, Mind, and Death. A Reader Edited and with an Introduction by Antony Flew. Toronto: Collier-Macmillan, 1964. Pp. Xi, 306. $2.25. [REVIEW] Dialogue 6 (03):452-453.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Stanley G. French (1965). Christian Philosophy. By Lawrence E. Lynch. Toronto: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 1963. 108 Pages. $1.75. (Paperback $1.00).St. Thomas and Philosophy. By Anton C. Pegis. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1964. 104 Pages. $2.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 3 (04):448-450.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stanley G. French (1965). Value and Existence: Studies in Philosophic Anthropology. By Frederick Patka. New York: Philosophical Library, 1964. Pp. Vii, 239. $4.75. [REVIEW] Dialogue 4 (03):410-412.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Stanley G. French (1963). Hume's Hurdle. Dialogue 1 (04):390-399.
    The subject of this paper is the relationship between factual beliefs and moral beliefs, between is-statements and ought-statements. Hume recognizes that a problem exists concerning this relationship. He states the problem in an oft-quoted passage from his Treatise. In their writings, moral philosophers pass imperceptibly from is-statements to ought-statements; and this change is “of the last consequence. For as this ought, or ought not, expresses some new relation or affirmation, 'tis necessary that it shou'd be observ'd and explain'd; and at (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation