Search results for 'Steen O. Welding' (try it on Scholar)

10 found
Sort by:
  1. S. O. Welding (2004). Die Differenz Von Meinung Und Wissen. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 35 (1):147-155.score: 240.0
    The Difference between Belief and Knowledge. The assumption that knowledge can be defined in terms of belief is considered to be mistaken. Since Gettier problems are shown to be misconstrued, the question cannot arise whether his conditions for knowledge are sufficient for claiming ``knowledge is justified true belief''. Ayers' conditions for knowledge in addition with a specific stipulation proof to be instructive for elaborating the differences between knowledge and belief.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Steen Olaf Welding (2013). Ist die ethische Disjunktion Determinismus oder Indeterminismus lösbar? Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Begriff der Handlung. Archiv Fuer Rechts- Und Sozialphilosphie 99 (4):556-563.score: 240.0
    It seems that actions are perceived from two different perspectives: on the one hand by the agent of the action and on the other hand by the observer. The latter perspective appears to be more reliable because of inter-subjective observations. Hence, determinists argue that actions can be causally explained by events, whereas the indeterminists claim that actions are acausal events. If e.g. Mary opens the door, we observe her behaviour but not her action; for it is not clear to us (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. S. O. Welding (1971). Aristotle's Theory of the Syllogism. A Logico-Philological Study of Book A of the Prior Analytics. Philosophy and History 4 (2):156-156.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Steen Olaf Welding (1984). Die Struktur der Begründung Wissenschaftlicher Prognosen. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 15 (1):72-91.score: 240.0
    Summary Influenced by the account of K. Popper and, moreover, of C. G. Hempel and P. Oppenheim, it is generally assumed, that a prediction can be logically deduced from hypotheses, i. e. lawlike propositions, and initial conditions. It is not clear, in which respect a prediction can correctly be supposed to be a proposition which is either true or false. From a logical point of view, serious difficulties arise in assuming that the deductive-nomological model consists of a valid argument. Further (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. S. O. Welding (1977). Schwierigkeiten in Freges Grundlagen der Logik. Kant-Studien 68 (1-4):420-445.score: 240.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. St O. Welding (1971). Frege's Conception of Sense and Reference Related to Russell's Theory of Definite Descriptions. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 25:389-402.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. S. O. Welding (1972). Russell's Theory of Definite Description as Opposed to Quine's Singular Terms. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 26:513-33.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Monica Meijsing (2007). Steen Olaf Welding, Die Unerkennbarkeit Des Geistes. Phänomenale Erfahrung Und Menschliche Erkenntnis. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (2):407-412.score: 140.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Mamm Meijsing (2008). Steen Olaf Welding, Die Unerkennbarkeit des Geistes. Phänomenale Erfahrung und menschliche Erkenntnis.(Review of the book Die Unerkennbarkeit des Geistes. Phänomenale Erfahrung und menschliche Erkenntnis, 2002, 10838-007-9042-9). [REVIEW] Journal for the General Philosophy of Science 38:407-412.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Andy Clark, Grand Illusion.score: 24.0
    We seem, or so it seems to some theorists, to experience a rich stream of highly detailed information concerning an extensive part of our current visual surroundings. But this appearance, it has been suggested, is in some way illusory. Our brains do not command richly detailed internal models of the current scene. Our seeings, it seems, are not all that they seem. This, then, is the Grand Illusion. We think we see much more than we actually do. In this paper (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation