49 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Stephanie J. Bird [47]Stephanie Bird [2]
  1. Raymond E. Spier & Stephanie J. Bird (2014). Science and Engineering Ethics Enters its Third Decade. Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):1-3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Stephanie J. Bird (2013). Security and Privacy: Why Privacy Matters. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):669-671.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Henk Zandvoort, Tom Børsen, Michael Deneke & Stephanie J. Bird (2013). Editors' Overview Perspectives on Teaching Social Responsibility to Students in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4):1413-1438.
    Global society is facing formidable current and future problems that threaten the prospects for justice and peace, sustainability, and the well-being of humanity both now and in the future. Many of these problems are related to science and technology and to how they function in the world. If the social responsibility of scientists and engineers implies a duty to safeguard or promote a peaceful, just and sustainable world society, then science and engineering education should empower students to fulfil this responsibility. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Stephanie J. Bird (2012). Involving Faculty in Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research. Teaching Ethics 12 (2):65-75.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stephanie J. Bird (2012). Potential for Bias in the Context of Neuroethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):593-600.
    Neuroscience research, like all science, is vulnerable to the influence of extraneous values in the practice of research, whether in research design or the selection, analysis and interpretation of data. This is particularly problematic for research into the biological mechanisms that underlie behavior, and especially the neurobiological underpinnings of moral development and ethical reasoning, decision-making and behavior, and the other elements of what is often called the neuroscience of ethics. The problem arises because neuroscientists, like most everyone, bring to their (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Michael Kalichman, Dena Plemmons & Stephanie J. Bird (2012). Editors' Overview: Neuroethics: Many Voices and Many Stories. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):423-432.
    Advances in neuroscience continue to enhance understanding of the brain and provide new tools to take advantage of that understanding. These changes are poised to profoundly alter society. Given that the impact will be felt not only by neuroscientists, but by diverse members of society, it is imperative that conversations engage all stakeholders. Doing so will allow for the sharing of diverse views and perspectives to understand and frame the science, better educate and prepare the public for new developments, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Stephanie Bird (2010). Responsible Research: What is Expected? Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):693-696.
    Responsible research and good science are concepts with various meanings depending on one’s perspective and assumptions. Fellow researchers, research participants, policy makers and the general public also have differing expectations of the benefits of research ranging from accurate and reliable data that extend the body of knowledge, to solutions to societal concerns. Unless these differing constituencies articulate their differing views they may fail to communicate and undermine the value of research to society.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Stephanie J. Bird (2010). Responsible Research: What is Expected? Commentary On: “Statistical Power, the Belmont Report, and the Ethics of Clinical Trials”. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):693-696.
    “Responsible research” and “good science” are concepts with various meanings depending on one’s perspective and assumptions. Fellow researchers, research participants, policy makers and the general public also have differing expectations of the benefits of research ranging from accurate and reliable data that extend the body of knowledge, to solutions to societal concerns. Unless these differing constituencies articulate their differing views they may fail to communicate and undermine the value of research to society.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Joe Giffels, Sara Vollmer & Stephanie Bird (2010). Editors' Overview: Topics in the Responsible Management of Research Data. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):631-637.
    Responsible data management is a multifaceted topic involving standards within the research community regarding research design and the sharing of data as well as the collection, selection, analysis and interpretation of data. Transparency in the manipulation of images is increasingly important in order to avoid misrepresentation of research findings, and research oversight is also critical in helping to assure the integrity of the research process. Intellectual property issues both unite and divide academe and industry in their approaches to data management. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Gary E. Marchant & Stephanie J. Bird (2009). Editors' Overview: Forbidding Science? [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):263-269.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Stephanie J. Bird (2008). Ethical Challenges in Research: Another Look. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (9):15 – 17.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Stephanie J. Bird & Raymond E. Spier (2008). A Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policy for Science and Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):149-152.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ben A. Minteer, James P. Collins & Stephanie J. Bird (2008). Editors' Overview: The Emergence of Ecological Ethics. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4):473-481.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jinnie M. Garrett & Stephanie J. Bird (2007). Ethical Issues in Communicating Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):581-581.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Raymond Spier & Stephanie J. Bird (2007). Science and Engineering Ethics at Springer. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):1-3.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Stephanie J. Bird (2006). Research Ethics, Research Integrity and the Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):411-412.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Stephanie J. Bird (2005). The Complexity of Competing and Conflicting Interests. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):515-517.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Stephanie J. Bird & Joan E. Sieber (2005). Teaching Ethics in Science and Engineering: Effective Online Education. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):323-328.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Stephanie J. Bird (2004). Consulting the Community: Limits and Expectations. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):481-482.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Stephanie J. Bird (2004). Publicizing Scientific Misconduct and its Consequences. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):435-436.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Stephanie J. Bird (2003). Allocating Resources in a Global Community. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):339-339.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Stephanie J. Bird (2003). Ethics as a Core Competency in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):443-444.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Mark S. Frankel & Stephanie J. Bird (2003). The Role of Scientific Societies in Promoting Research Integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):139-140.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Raymond E. Spier & Stephanie J. Bird (2003). On the Management of Funding of Research in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):298-300.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Stephanie J. Bird (2002). Responsibilities of Scientists and Engineers: Theory and Practice. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):130-130.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Stephanie J. Bird (2002). Self-Plagiarism and Dual and Redundant Publications: What is the Problem? Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):543-544.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Stephanie J. Bird (2002). Science and Technology for the Good of Society? Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):3-4.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Stephanie J. Bird (2001). Mentors, Advisors and Supervisors: Their Role in Teaching Responsible Research Conduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):455-468.
    Although the terms mentor and thesis advisor (or research supervisor) are often used interchangeably, the responsibilities associated with these roles are distinct, even when they overlap. Neither are role models necessarily mentors, though mentors are role models: good examples are necessary but not sufficient. Mentorship is both a personal and a professional relationship. It has the potential for raising a number of ethical concerns, including issues of accuracy and reliability of the information conveyed, access, stereotyping and tracking of advisees, and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Stephanie J. Bird (2001). Where Are We? Where Are We Going? Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):163-164.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Stephanie J. Bird & Robert L. Sprague (2001). Mentoring and the Responsible Conduct of Research: Reflections and Future. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):451-453.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Stephanie J. Bird & Alicia K. Dustira (2000). New Common Federal Definition of Research Misconduct in the United States. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):123-130.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jinnie M. Garreu & Stephanie J. Bird (2000). Ethical Issues in Communicating Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):435-442.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Professor Jinnie M. Garreu & Stephanie J. Bird (2000). Ethical Issues in Communicating Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):435-442.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Raymond Spier & Stephanie J. Bird (2000). Scientific Misconduct: Ongoing Developments. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):3-4.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Stephanie J. Bird & Alicia K. Dustira (1999). Misconduct in Science: Controversy and Progress. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):131-136.
    It is clear that the concept of scientific misconduct continues to evolve. As always it is the goal of Science and Engineering Ethics to move the discussion forward, to encourage and facilitate discussion of the ethical issues and problems that practicing scientists and engineers encounter in the course of pursuing their professions. This collection of articles and commentaries provides a variety of perspectives that we expect will facilitate communication among and within the groups who must participate in this evolution.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Stephanie J. Bird (1998). Educational Forum: Stimulating a Sense of Responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):213-214.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Stephanie J. Bird (1998). The Role of Professional Societies: Codes of Conduct and Their Enforcement. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):315-320.
    In discussions of professional standards and ethical values it is reasonable to consider who will develop the codes of conduct and guidelines for behavior that will reflect the standards and values of the community. Also worthy of consideration is whether the standards or guidelines are enforceable, and how and to what extent they will be enforced. The development of guidelines or professional codes of conduct is a responsibility that has been adopted by many professional societies. Useful to this discussion is (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Stephanie J. Bird & Raymond E. Spier (1998). Communicating to the Public Via the Media: Practical and Ethical Issues. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (4):395-396.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Stephanie J. Bird (1997). Authorship Under Review. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):235-236.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Stephanie J. Bird (1997). Cloning—Another Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (4):355-356.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Stephanie J. Bird (1996). The Role of Science Professionals in Teaching Responsible Research Conduct. BioScience 46 (10):783-786.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Stephanie J. Bird & Ray Spier (1996). Science and Engineering Ethics One Year On. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):3-4.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Stephanie J. Bird (1995). Commentary on “Good to the Last Drop? Millikan Stories as 'Canned' Pedagogy”. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (3):215-216.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Stephanie J. Bird (1995). Convocation on Scientific Conduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):91-92.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Stephanie J. Bird (1995). Teaching and Learning Research Ethics. Professional Ethics 4 (3/4):155-178.
  46. Stephanie J. Bird (1995). The Educational Forum. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):81-82.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Stephanie J. Bird (1995). The Societal Dimension of Ethical Issues in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (2):99-100.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Stephanie J. Bird & David E. Housman (1995). Trust and the Collection, Selection, Analysis and Interpretation of Data: A Scientist's View. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):371-382.
    Trust is a critical component of research: trust in the work of co-workers and colleagues within the scientific community; trust in the work of research scientists by the non-research community. A wide range of factors, including internally and externally generated pressures and practical and personal limitations, affect the research process. The extent to which these factors are understood and appreciated influence the development of trust in scientific research findings.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Stephanie J. Bird & Raymond Spier (1995). Welcome to Science and Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):2-4.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation